Beyond the guidelines for the treatment of severely malnourished children with complications—assessment from Cambodia

Abstract

Background

From 2005 to 2010, the percentage of children dangerously thin (also called wasted) crossed the International Phase Classification Emergency Threshold, increasing from 8.4 to 10.9 %. As a result, Cambodia is now among the 20 worst countries globally for child wasting—with malnutrition implicated in more than 6400 child deaths annually. This study, therefore, sought to provide information on the actual treatment of severely acute malnourished children with complication in Cambodian hospitals.

Methods

Data was collected from March to June 2014, from hospital records of 1450 children admitted for treatment of severe acute malnutrition with complications as in-patient in 19 hospitals from 2011 to 2013. Recovery rates were determined using weight-for-height z-scores and the percentage of weight gain for children without oedema. Additional data on duration of stay in hospital, prevalence of follow-up visits, and rates of weight gain were also analyzed.

Results

According to weight for height z-score (WHZ), 58.6 % of the children without oedema (n = 1100) were defined as cured of severe acute malnutrition at discharge. On average, during their stay in hospital, children were gaining approximately 7 % of their bodyweight. In regards to follow-up visits, 86.7 % of children without oedema were defined as cured after three follow-up visits, with an improved WHZ of +2.28 z-score since admission. When looking at the progress and achievements in regards to follow-up visits, the rate of children participating in three follow-up visits increased from 25.7 to 42.8 % between 2011 and 2013.

Conclusions

A major finding from this research was that the children who completed three follow-up visits were not only cured (>−3 standard deviation (SD)) but were no longer moderately malnourished, as most of them ended up with a z-score >−2SD.

Background

Acute malnutrition continues to be a major public health concern worldwide, and in Southeast Asia alone, over two million children under the age of five are suffering from severe acute malnutrition (SAM) [1].

Cambodia is among the 20 worst countries globally when it comes to child malnutrition [2]. The Cambodian burden of undernutrition among children is enormous with 40 % of children under the age of five stunted in 2010, 11 % wasted, and 28 % underweight [3]. Although stunting has decreased over the last decade, from 43 % in 2005 and 50 % in 2000, wasting has slightly increased since 2005. Malnutrition is implicated in more than 6400 child deaths annually, and child malnutrition has health and economic consequences that will affect Cambodia for generations to come [4]. Improving the nutritional status of children is therefore a development priority. Systematic poverty and poor child health continue to remain key issues in Cambodia [3], and an immediate reason for the persistence of child malnutrition is that over half of the children aged 6–23 months do not receive a minimum acceptable diet (United Nations children’s fund (UNICEF) personal communication).

Despite the relatively high prevalence of nutritional problems, there has been a lack of published data on the treatment of children with acute malnutrition in Southeast Asia [1]. With a prevalence of 2.5 % of severely acute malnourished children in Cambodia [3], 60,000 to 80,000 cases could need specialized medical treatment, including therapeutic feeding, every year. Therefore, in Cambodia, UNICEF focused its intervention on treating cases of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) at the hospital level for those who have complications. Cambodia Hospital-based management of severe acute malnutrition started in the early 2000s with support from the Health Sector Support Project and UNICEF. Between 2008 and 2014, the hospitals implementing these services further doubled and in 2012, 35 out of 73 hospitals were able to provide SAM treatment of which 19 had more than 3 years of experiences. Guidelines for SAM management were revised in 2006 and later in 2012 with support from the Millennium Development Goal Funds (MDGF) program [5]. The treatment for malnutrition was normally carried out by one of the doctors or nurses at the hospital, as there was no staff position regarding nutrition at the referral hospital. Once discharged, the in-patient treatment of SAM cases with complications was followed up through out-patient visits to the hospital. This out-patient treatment was based on take-home rations with three follow-up visits.

Although programs have been in place to treat malnutrition since 2000, it is thought that program success is weakened by a high proportion of children not completely recovering before dropping out. These children are then likely to become severely malnourished again and are at a great risk of irreversible stunting because they would not return to a normal growth pattern [6]. All children, regardless of ethnicity, have the same potential for growth in the first 5 years of life. Until the age of five, height and weight are not greatly dependent on genetics [7]. It is estimated that proper identification and management of acute malnutrition could prevent over 400,000 child deaths in the world annually [8]. The actual paper is not evaluating the management of acute malnutrition and any preventing measures. The current study aimed to evaluate the treatment of severely acute malnourished children referred to hospital facilities as in-patient in Cambodia. The study will estimate the number of children cured at the end of the national protocol and will potentially also identify bottlenecks and way forward to improve national policies and guidelines to make it more efficient.

Methods

Study design and inclusion criteria

In addition to on-going monitoring data collected on a monthly basis by the National Nutrition Programme at the 35 hospitals, clinical records of children up to 6 years of age, admitted for treatment of acute malnutrition from 2011 to 2013, were collected from March to June 2014 in 19 hospitals from 13 provinces in Cambodia (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Children were admitted as in-patient treatment at the hospital if (i) there was bilateral pitting oedema, (ii) weight for height was less than −3 standard deviation, (iii) infants were <6 months with bilateral pitting oedema or visible wasting , or (iv) infants were >6 months but weigh less than 4 kg.

The hospitals were selected according to the number of years of intervention. Hospital selected should have been implementing SAM treatment for more than 3 years. The study profile and the information collected are presented in Fig. 1. Recovery rates were determined using weight-for-height z-scores and the percentage of weight gain for children without oedema. Children with oedema were not included in our study, only the length of treatment at the hospital was observed. Additional data on duration of stay in hospital, prevalence of follow-up visits, and rates of weight gain were also analyzed. Data entering and staff interviews were conducted by UNICEF staff and a representative from the National Nutrition Programme (NNP). According to the Cambodian Ministry of Health, the study did not require a formal ethics approval as no name and no personal information have been collected.

Fig. 1

Study profile

Data and statistical analysis

The article was quality assessed using the STROBE combined checklist for case–control studies. Data was entered in Microsoft Excel 2013. For children from 6 months to 6 years, anthropometric z-scores were calculated using the National Center for Health Statistics/WHO growth reference data of 2006 [9], using the WHO Anthro software for standard population. Anthropometric status was assessed by the following indicators: weight-for-age <−2 z-scores (WAZ) for underweight and weight-for-height <−2 z-scores (WHZ) for wasting. Data management and analysis were performed with SPSS software version 20™ (SPSS, V20; IBM SPSS, USA). Comparisons between groups (boys and girls) of data were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results

According to the on-going government monitoring, between 2011 and 2013, 4350 children were treated as in-patients for severe acute malnutrition. In the same period, the dropout and mortality rates decreased from 11.0 to 4.9 % and 1.2 to 1.0 %, respectively (2011 as compared to 2013). In addition, when looking at the progress and achievements in regard to the out-patient treatment, the rate of children participating in three follow-up visits increased from 25.7 to 42.8 % between 2011 and 2013 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Prevalence of follow-up visits among discharged children from 2011, 2012, and 2013 respectively

Among the cases collected (n = 1450), 50.9 % were male and 49.1 % female. The average age of the children treated was 17.1 months. The average duration of stay of children without oedema in hospital was 8.7 ± 5.8 days compared to 11.9 ± 9.8 days for children with oedema.

For children without oedema (n = 1100), overall bodyweight increased throughout the treatment period (from approximately 7.1 to 8.6 kg) from admission to discharge and through follow-up 1, 2, and 3, respectively (Fig. 3). In average, the time between discharge and the first follow-up visit is 9.7 days, 15.2 days between the 1st follow-up visit and the second one and finally 19.9 days between the second and the third follow-up visit. When looking at the percentage of weight gain, the greatest increase was seen during in-patient treatment (IPD), with 7.6 % for girls and 8.0 % for boys (p > 0.05). In regard to both in-patient and out-patient treatment (three follow-up visits), the overall average weight gain was approximately 20 % for both genders. In general, 58.6 % of the children without oedema were defined as cured of severe acute malnutrition at discharge.

Fig. 3

Weight trends in kilograms (left axis) and percentage of weight gain (right axis) from admission to discharge and through follow-up 1, 2, and 3

In regard to the follow-up visits, 75.6, 77.9, and 86.7 % of children without oedema were defined as cured after one, two, and three follow-up visits, respectively, with an improved WHZ of approximately +1.3 z-score since admission after one follow-up visit, +1.8 z-score after two follow-up visits, and +2.3 z-score after three follow-up visits (Fig. 4). On average, the total duration of the treatment (IPD and three follow-up visits) lasted for a total of 53.5 days. All WAZ z-scores improved as well over the entire treatment period from −3.67 z-score to −2.57 z-score.

Fig. 4

Increase in WHZ (z-score in right axis) from admission to follow-up 3 (n = 542)

Discussion

This study showed that most of the children admitted to the hospital with SAM <−3SD, were actually discharged as cured when using WHZ as an indicator (>−3SD). The latest report from the on-going monitoring from the government (personal communication) stated that >65 % of SAM children were not cured if the threshold of 15 % weight gain was used; however, our results indicate that the proportion is substantially lower, with 41.4 % not defined as cured at discharge. According to the current guidelines [5], the period of in-patient treatment is meant to last until the child has gained 15 % of their own bodyweight; however, we found that the average duration of stay in the hospital was 8.7 days (±5.8), with an average weight increase of only 7.4 %. This finding indicates that there is a need to revise the current guidelines, which would make the management and treatment of SAM more efficient and cost-effective for the government as well as the caretakers. As highlighted by the 2013 WHO update on the treatment of severe acute malnutrition, 15 % weight gain is not an appropriate discharge criterion [10]. This report emphasizes that the anthropometric indicator that is used to confirm severe acute malnutrition should also be used to assess whether a child has reached nutritional recovery [10].

One of the major findings from this research was that the children who completed three follow-up visits were not only cured based on the above −3SD but were also no longer moderately malnourished, as most of them ended up >−2SD.

Mothers staying in average of 8.7 days in the hospital are already an achievement in Cambodia, as most mothers and caretakers proved unwilling to stay at the hospital for much longer, due to reasons like responsibility for other children at home and the need to tend to farm and livestock. Additionally, research on dropping out by Noij & Un (UNICEF personal communication) found that after the complementary disease was treated, mothers were unwilling to stay for malnutrition only, as her child could walk and play again and “did no longer look ill”. However, mothers are increasingly bringing back their children to follow-up visits. There has been an increase in follow-up visits over the last years, and compliance for the third follow-up has increased by 40 % from 2011 to 2013. To ensure that this compliance continues to increase, we need to ensure that mothers or caregivers are motivated. It appears from the study of Noij & Un that compliance in Cambodia depend much on the motivation of the mother/caretaker which was in many cases not very high. With a limited motivation of mothers and caretakers, there does not need to be much of a reason to discontinue treatment and many small reasons were provided to justify default. The reasons to stop treatment included the taste of the therapeutic food but also the limited time to devote to the treatment as they needed to focus on other household and economic activities.

The substantial weight gain of most children using BP100 can be considered to provide a stimulus for caretakers to come for follow-up visits, as they see that the treatment does provide beneficial results for the child concerned. The mothers and caretakers that do come for three follow-up visits are often characterized as those that are “eager to see their child gain weight”, i.e., they recognize the importance of weight gain given the condition of the child (UNICEF personal communication).

This finding clearly shows that IPD and follow-up visits work as a program for treatment of SAM with complications. Our study emphasizes the importance of follow-up visits to further lower the WHZ and decrease the risk of relapse.

When looking at the progress and achievements in regard to IPD, treatment in hospitals has gone from a few days of hospitalization and low compliance regarding follow-up visits to an extended stay in hospital with a take-home ration of ready-to-use therapeutic foods (RUTFs) and improved compliance regarding follow-up visits. The increase found in the duration of stay in hospital might be explained by incentives provided to the caretakers, such as Health Equity Funds (HEF) [11]. The provision of HEF in regard to treatment of malnutrition was started in 2012 and are a pro-poor third party health financing mechanism providing health services for the identified poor (UNICEF personal communication). This means that the child is treated for free, including therapeutic foods, antibiotics, and any other drugs or supply needed. There is no charge for overnight stay, and they are provided with a food allowance per day. Additionally, the caretaker is reimbursed for transport fees, based on the distance and quality of the road. Transport support was also provided for follow-up visits; financial support and the introduction of a take-home ration are likely contributors to increased compliance [11].

In addition, the actual Cambodian guidelines and intervention emphasize the need to have a follow-up visit 5 weeks after discharge to avoid a relapse. In the context of Cambodia with a prevalence of wasting around 10 %, this final visit is essential to screen any tendency to prevent another episode of SAM (it seems not be the case for children having three follow-up visits). It is not yet well understood how much wasting contributes to conditions such as stunting. Evidence does suggest [12], however, that episodes of wasting negatively affect linear growth and, therefore, undermine child growth and development. It is, therefore, urgent to find a sustainable way to screen those children 5 weeks after; as of today only less than half of the children are coming back to these third visits.

Limitations

Nineteen hospitals over the 35 existing were assessed. The authors decided to assess the hospitals that have been implementing SAM for at least 3 years (since the national guideline was approved). The newly open hospitals have learned from those hospitals, and therefore, we used the hypothesis that they will perform better than the one trained previously. Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is a nationwide issue with a national prevalence of 2.5 % in 2010 [1]. The 13 provinces are homogeneous mixed of provinces with prevalence above and below the national prevalence for SAM.

The quality of the recording of patient files was poor in several hospitals. This might be due to a lack of training of staff or a lack of a proper system for recording. Therefore, we could not further analyze the use of the treatment (antibiotics, F75, F100, vitamin A, BP100) in the management of children with severe acute malnutrition in out-patient care. Even though there was limited recording of types of antibiotics received, one concern that has been aired is that antibiotics are given to all children, whether the child has SAM with complications or not thus increasing the risk of antibiotic resistance. There is a need to reeducate health care staff on proper use of antibiotics, and specify that if antibiotics are given it needs to be given consistently, the same type taken over a minimum of 10 days [13].

The collection of data on the treatment of SAM at the level of Hospitals did not appear to be standardized. Nutrition and treatment for SAM indicators have not yet been included in the Health Monitoring Information System. It is therefore urgent to develop a web-based monitoring system at hospital and health center level to ensure that the correct protocols are used and children are well-treated.

Next steps

Take-home rations are an important aspect of the treatment to ensure that the children will reach a WHZ > −2 z-scores. In order to be sustainable, the Government of Cambodia will have to include RUTF in their essential medical drug list to be able to purchase it and be less dependent on the funds of developing partners.

Capacities have been built in particular at the hospital, and attention has been paid to policy and guidelines, in particular the protocol for treatment of acute malnutrition. The limitation in terms of capacity development has been that much that the attention was focused at the individual level. Much less attention was paid to the institutional capacities, one of which concerns staffing structures, which leaves hospitals as well as health centers without staff with nutrition pre-service training. The establishment of an MSc course on Nutrition is an important step towards a more institutional approach to develop the capacities of health staffs and other individuals and can be expected to bear fruit only a few years from now.

With only 1600 cases annually referred to hospital and treated with F75, F100, and BP100 among an estimated 6000 cases of severe acute malnutrition with complications, mass screening is still a bottleneck as almost no routine screening is performed at the health center level or community level. In addition, unfortunately, the methodology used (mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC)) had a very small sensitivity and specificity to find the severely malnourished children [14]. It is essential to revise the guidelines for mass screening to ensure that children are well-screened.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the programs for treatment of malnutrition are working well, in regard to a higher proportion of children being cured than anticipated, despite the need for revision of the current guidelines to not use the gain weight as a discharge criteria. Those results should be used for advocacy purpose to ensure that the government invests more for the treatment of SAM as it seems to be well-implemented and getting positive results. In Cambodia, a short hospitalization with a prolonged follow-up may be a solution to improve nutritional status of severely malnourished children. That said, there is a need for an improved system; so by revising the current guidelines and providing refresher courses on the management including screening and treatment of SAM to the hospitals and health centers, further improvements might be seen on wasting prevalence and also on long term on stunting prevalence.