A valid and reliable nutrition knowledge questionnaire for track and field athletes
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 17 August 2016
Accepted: 5 April 2017
Published: 12 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jacqueline McCormack|
|9 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Truls Raastad|
|10 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Matthew Furber|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Truls Raastad|
|3 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Matthew Furber|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Apr 2017||Editorially accepted|
|12 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s40795-017-0156-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.