Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Weight of Evidence Awarded to Each Study

From: A systematic review of complementary feeding practices in South Asian infants and young children: the Bangladesh perspective

Studies Weight of Evidence A Weight of Evidence B Weight of Evidence C Weight of Evidence D
Quality of Methodology: The accuracy, coherency and transparency of evidence. Relevance of Methodology: The appropriateness of the methodology for answering the review question. Relevance of evidence to the review question: The relevance of the focus of the evidence for answering the review question. Overall weight of evidence: Overall assessment of the extent to which the study provides evidence to answer the review question
Akhtar et al. 2012 [22] Low Medium Medium Medium
Ara et al. 2012 [23] Low High Medium Medium
Begum et al. 2013 [21] Low Medium Medium Medium
BurhanUddin et al. 2011 [20] Medium Medium High Medium
Das et al. 2008 [45] Medium Medium Low Medium
Faruque et al. 2008 [2] Medium Low Medium Medium
Goudet et al. 2011 [25] Medium Medium Low Medium
Goudet et al. 2011 [24] Medium Medium Medium Medium
Hackett et al. 2015 [26] High Medium Medium Medium
Hajeebhoy et al. 2013 [44] Low Medium Low Low
Hanif et al. 2013 [19] High Medium High High
Haque et al. 2016 [27] Medium Medium Medium Medium
Helen Keller International 2009 [18] High Medium Medium Medium
Kabir et al. 2012 [6] High High High High
Kamruzzaman et al. 2009 [28] Low Medium Medium Medium
Karim et al. 2012 [29] Low Low Medium Low
Khan et al. 2011 [30] Medium Medium Medium Medium
Khatoon et al. 2011 [17] Medium Medium High Medium
Khatun et al. 2012 [46] Medium Medium Medium Medium
Kimmons et al. 2005 [31] High Medium Medium Medium
Mahejabin et al. 2013 [32] Medium Medium Medium Medium
Mihrshahi et al. 2010 [41] Medium High High High
Moore et al. 2006 [33] Medium Medium Medium Medium
Islam et al. 2008 [34] Medium Medium Low Medium
Nguyen et al. 2013 [16] High High High High
Owais et al. 2016 [15] High High High High
Paul et al. 2014 [35] Medium Medium Medium Medium
Rahman et al. 2016 [36] High High High High
Rasheed et al. 2011 [14] Medium High High High
Rawat et al. 2014 [13] High Medium Medium Medium
Saha et al. 2008 [37] Medium High High High
Saleh et al. 2014 [40] Medium Medium Medium Medium
Salim et al. 2012 [38] Low Medium Medium Medium
Sarkar et al. 2003 [42] Low Medium Medium Medium
Sultana et al. 2014 [39] Medium Medium High Medium
Zongrone et al. 2012 [8] Medium Medium Medium Medium