Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of two forms of daily preventive zinc supplementation versus therapeutic zinc supplementation for diarrhea on young children’s physical growth and risk of infection: study design and rationale for a randomized controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shinjini Bhatnagar
17 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Allen
29 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - K. Ryan Wessells
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Allen
28 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Schlussel
3 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - K. Ryan Wessells
Resubmission - Version 3
3 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Schlussel
8 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - K. Ryan Wessells
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
13 Aug 2018 Editorially accepted
29 Nov 2018 Article published 10.1186/s40795-018-0247-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement