Skip to main content

Table 4 Sample size calculations to assess intervention impact on primary and secondary outcomes

From: Comparison of two forms of daily preventive zinc supplementation versus therapeutic zinc supplementation for diarrhea on young children’s physical growth and risk of infection: study design and rationale for a randomized controlled trial

Variable

Detectable difference

βa

Unadjusted sample size per treatment group

Attrition

Adjusted sample size per treatment groupb

Total sample size, four treatment groups

Primary outcomes

Length and length-for-age-Z-score

0.20 SD

0.10

710

15%

850

3400

Weight and weight-for-age-Z-score

0.20 SD

0.10

710

15%

850

3400

Incidence of diarrhea

0.20 SD

0.10

710

15%

850

3400

Biochemical indicators of micronutrient statusc

0.40 SD

0.20

133

30%

190

760

Indicators of innate and adaptive immune response

0.50 SD

0.20

88

30%

125

500

Secondary outcomes

Intestinal parasite burden

0.30 SD

0.20

244

20%

305

1220

Indicators of environmental enteric dysfunction

0.35 SD

0.20

179

20%

225

900

Hair cortisol

0.40 SD

0.20

133

30%

190

760

  1. aPower used for sample size calculation with a significance of α = 0.05
  2. bAdjusted for attrition and rounded up
  3. cHemoglobin concentration was used as a screening criteria for study enrollment; thus the hemoglobin concentration of all children enrolled in the study was assessed and sample size calculations were not completed for this primary outcome