Skip to main content

Table 2 Association between stunting and residence, region, mother’s education and socio-economic status

From: Trends and inequalities in stunting in Nepal: a secondary data analysis of four Nepal demographic health surveys from 2001 to 2016

Characteristics

2001

2006

2011

2016

COR (95%CI)

AOR (95%CI)

COR (95%CI)

AOR (95%CI)

COR (95%CI)

AOR (95%CI)

COR (95%CI)

AOR (95%CI)

Type of place of residence

P < 0.001

P = 0.219

P < 0.001

P = 0.384

P < 0.001

P = 0.183

P = 0.001

P = 0.572

Rural

1.87 (1.58,2.2)

1.13 (0.93,1.36)

1.83 (1.52,2.2)

1.1 (0.89,1.37)

1.97 (1.53,2.55)

1.24 (0.9,1.69)

1.43 (1.16,1.77)

1.06 (0.86,1.32)

Urban

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Mother’s education

P < 0.001

P < 0.001

P < 0.001

P < 0.001

P < 0.001

P = 0.116

P < 0.001

P < 0.001

No education

2.99 (2.26,3.95)

2.27 (1.7,3.05)

7.18 (3.75,13.73)

5.22 (2.54,10.74)

3.08 (1.74,5.43)

1.81 (0.92,3.55)

3.15 (2.22,4.46)

1.92 (1.28,2.89)

Primary

1.91 (1.37,2.67)

1.54 (1.09,2.17)

4.53 (2.35,8.74)

3.54 (1.73,7.23)

2.31 (1.25,4.27)

1.55 (0.77,3.12)

2.17 (1.51,3.12)

1.34 (0.91,1.98)

Secondary

1.34 (0.97,1.86)

1.23 (0.88,1.72)

2.22 (1.15,4.28)

1.99 (0.97,4.07)

1.49 (0.81,2.73)

1.27 (0.66,2.42)

1.6 (1.13,2.26)

1.25 (0.86,1.81)

Higher

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Wealth Quintiles

P < 0.001

P < 0.001

P < 0.001

P < 0.001

P < 0.001

P < 0.001

P < 0.001

P = 0.083

Poorest

2.87 (2.37,3.48)

1.9 (1.55,2.33)

3.57 (2.84,4.49)

1.87 (1.36,2.58)

3.65 (2.58,5.18)

2.47 (1.51,4.02)

4.91 (3.39,7.12)

4.18 (2.6,6.71)

Poorer

2.17 (1.83,2.58)

1.43 (1.18,1.74)

2.7 (2.22,3.3)

1.67 (1.3,2.13)

2.42 (1.68,3.5)

1.7 (1.04,2.78)

3.2 (2.19,4.67)

2.6 (1.66,4.07)

Middle

1.63 (1.38,1.94)

1.14 (0.95,1.36)

2.26 (1.76,2.89)

1.54 (1.17,2.02)

1.52 (1,2.31)

1.15 (0.71,1.88)

2.81 (1.9,4.17)

1.99 (1.28,3.1)

Richer

1.55 (1.31,1.84)

1.16 (0.97,1.39)

1.47 (1.19,1.82)

1.15 (0.9,1.46)

1.26 (0.85,1.88)

1.05 (0.69,1.6)

2.43 (1.64,3.6)

1.82 (1.14,2.89)

Richest

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Development regions

P < 0.001

P = 0.011

P < 0.001

P < 0.001

P = 0.009

P = 0.630

P = 0.214

P = 0.014

Central

1.36 (1.12,1.66)

1.33 (1.11,1.59)

1.49 (1.14,1.94)

1.51 (1.2,1.89)

1.05 (0.75,1.48)

0.99 (0.68,1.45)

1.1 (0.85,1.42)

1.11 (0.84,1.45)

Western

1.31 (1.03,1.67)

1.45 (1.14,1.83)

1.51 (1.17,1.95)

1.76 (1.38,2.25)

1.02 (0.7,1.47)

1.04 (0.7,1.54)

1.24 (0.87,1.77)

1.5 (1.06,2.11)

Mid-western

1.58 (1.28,1.94)

1.26 (1,1.57)

2.04 (1.59,2.63)

1.71 (1.33,2.19)

1.73 (1.18,2.54)

1.28 (0.87,1.87)

1.49 (1.06,2.1)

1.3 (0.91,1.85)

Far-western

1.45 (1.14,1.84)

1.13 (0.86,1.49)

1.64 (1.28,2.11)

1.26 (1.01,1.56)

1.48 (1.02,2.14)

1.11 (0.74,1.66)

1.16 (0.83,1.62)

0.91 (0.64,1.29)

Eastern

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Ecological zones

P < 0.001

P < 0.001

P < 0.001

P = 0.012

P < 0.001

P = 0.167

P = 0.005

P = 0.003

Mountain

1.7 (1.42,2.03)

1.47 (1.22,1.76)

1.92 (1.5,2.47)

1.55 (1.16,2.08)

1.88 (1.4,2.52)

1.2 (0.87,1.66)

1.51 (1.07,2.15)

0.98 (0.65,1.47)

Hill

1.28 (1.08,1.51)

1.18 (1,1.38)

1.18 (0.96,1.44)

1.2 (0.98,1.45)

1.22 (0.96,1.55)

0.91 (0.7,1.2)

0.82 (0.66,1.03)

0.67 (0.5,0.89)

Terai

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

  1. Children who slept in the household the night before the survey and who have complete information on date of birth were selected for analysis for the year 2001, 2006 and 2011. For 2016, children who slept in the household the night before the survey only were selected. Data weighted according to DHS recommendations [13]