Impact of fruits and vegetables vouchers on food insecurity in disadvantaged families from a Paris suburb

BMC Nutrition

Table 3 Comparison of food insecurity status between baseline and one-year follow-up, using Food Sufficiency Indicator (FSI) (N = 64)

	Baseline		One year follow-up		p value*
	n	%	n	%	p value*
All (n = 64)^†
Food sufficiency	14	21.9	22	34.4	0.10
Food insufficiency	50	78.1	42	65.6	0.10
Intervention group (N = 34)
Food sufficiency	5	14.7	13	38.2	0.03
Food insufficiency	29	85.3	21	61.8	0.03
Control group (N = 30)
Food sufficiency	9	30	9	30	1.00
Food insufficiency	21	70	21	70	1.00
Participation in workshops (N = 42)
Food sufficiency	7	16.7	13	30.9	0.11
Food insufficiency	35	83.3	29	69.1	0.11
No participation (N = 22)
Food sufficiency	7	31.8	9	40.9	0.44
Food insufficiency	15	68.2	13	52.1	0.44

*Proportion of families with food insufficiency between inclusion and follow-up were compared within each group using McNemar tests
† Comparison of FSI between intervention and control groups at inclusion (Fisher exact test): p value = 0.23
Difference-in-difference test p value = 0.12

ISSN: 2055-0928