Table 2 Data collected with the different tools for evaluation of the implementation process
From: Nutrition education and cooking workshops for families of children with cancer: a feasibility study
Tools | Data collected | Responsible for completing the tool |
|---|---|---|
Participant questionnaire | 1. Participant’s relationship with patient | Workshop participants |
2. Perception of knowledge acquisition | ||
3. Perceived utility of the recipes and advices | ||
4. Recommendations | ||
5. Additional comments | ||
Activity report | 1. Identification of the facilitators | Registered dietician facilitator |
2. Identification of the theme presented | ||
3. Time and duration of the workshop | ||
4. Number of participants | ||
5. Divulgation of the nutritional messages as planned | ||
6. Challenges and facilitators | ||
7. Facilitator’s perception of participants’ interest | ||
8. Questions from participants | ||
9. Proposed modifications to workshop delivery and content | ||
10. Obstacles related to language | ||
11. Number of participant questionnaires completed and flyers distributed | ||
12. Time required by participant(s) to complete the questionnaire and questions related its completion | ||
Field notes | 1. Notes from the facilitator during activity promotion | Registered dietician facilitator |
Appreciation survey | 1. Participant’s relationship with patient | Families enrolled in the VIE study |
2. Awareness of the workshops and how they learned about it | ||
3. Best time for attending to workshop | ||
4. Food tasting as an incentive for participation | ||
5. Reason for not attending a workshop | ||
6. Preferred approach to disseminate nutritional information | ||
7. Perceived utility of the workshop content | ||
8. Other comments |