Skip to main content

Table 4 Convergence and Divergence in feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and context

From: End-user perceptions of a patient- and family-centred intervention to improve nutrition intake among oncology patients: a descriptive qualitative analysis

Redundant concepts

Australia Patient

Australia Family

Australia Health Care Provider

Hong Kong Patient

Hong Kong Family

Hong Kong Health Care Provider

Reason for divergence

The intervention works in outpatient settings

C

C

C

C

C

C

N/A

The food diary is easy but needs to be tailored

C

C

D

C

C

D

The food diary is burdensome and does not support context-specific food choice

The information booklet is a good resource

C

C

D

C

C

D

HCPs were impartial to the value of the booklet.

The intervention should be delivered by a dietitiana, but could be delivered by a nurse

N/A

N/A

C

N/A

N/A

C

N/A

  1. aInterview questions related to who should deliver the intervention were only asked of HCPs
  2. C convergence, D divergence
Back to article page

BMC Nutrition

ISSN: 2055-0928

Contact us