Skip to main content

Table 2 Evaluation of measured and estimated REE in patients with type 2 diabetes

From: Predictive equations for evaluation for resting energy expenditure in Brazilian patients with type 2 diabetes: what can we use?

 

All

(n = 62)

Men

(n = 31)

Women

(n = 31)

Mean

SD

95% limits of agreement1

p value*

Mean

SD

95% limits of agreement1

p value*

Mean

SD

95% limits of agreement1

p value*

Measured REE by IC (kcal/day)

1644.6

310.6

  

1815.7

262.3

  

1473.4

258.5

  

Estimated REE (kcal/day)

            

Harris-Benedict [4]

1546.9

262.5

 

0.001

1734.4

231.8

 

0.065

1359.3

117.1

 

0.004

 Bias2 (kcal/day)

−97.7

 

(− 153.4;-41.94)

 

−81.3

 

(− 167.8; 5.3)

 

−114.1

 

(− 189.0; −39.2)

 

 Percent deviation3

−3.5

   

−1.9

   

−3.1

   

Bernstei n[5]

1660.1

498.9

 

0.799

2045.1

438.2

 

0.031

1275.0

88.1

 

< 0.001

 Bias2 (kcal/day)

15.5

 

(−105.3; 136.3)

 

229.4

 

(22.1; 436.6)

 

−198.4

 

(− 277.5;-119.3)

 

 Percent deviation3

0.2

   

2.2

   

−5.1

   

Schofield [6]

1478.5

296.7

 

< 0.001

1700.1

225.9

 

0.011

1256.8

162.6

 

< 0.001

 Bias2 (kcal/day)

− 166.1

 

(−223.6;-108.5)

 

−115.6

 

(− 203.2; −27.9)

 

− 216.6

 

(− 291.7; 141.5)

 

 Percent deviation3

−5.7

   

−2.6

   

−5.8

   

FAO/WHO/UNO [7]

1603.2

257.3

 

0.016

1745.6

227.7

 

0.108

1407.8

119.3

 

0.074

 Bias2 (kcal/day)

−41.4

 

(− 122.6; −13.0)

 

−70.1

 

(− 156.6; 16.3)

 

−65.6

 

(−137.9; 6.7)

 

 Percent deviation3

−2.4

   

−1.6

   

−1.8

   

Mifflin–St.Jeor [8]

1454.9

264.4

 

< 0.001

1663.5

181.7

 

0.001

1246.3

138.7

 

< 0.001

 Bias2 (kcal/day)

−189.7

 

(− 243.7;-135.6)

 

−152.2

 

(−235.3; −69.0)

 

−227.1

 

(− 298.5;155.7)

 

 Percent deviation3

−7.0

   

−3.7

   

−6.4

   

Gougeon et al. [9]

1547.1

248.0

 

0.002

1715.4

196.5

 

0.028

1378.8

167.2

 

0.028

 Bias2 (kcal/day)

−97.5

 

(−156.5; − 38.3)

 

−100.3

 

(− 188.8; − 11.7)

 

−94.6

 

(− 178.1; −

 

 Percent deviation3

−3.2

   

−2.3

   

−2.3

 

11.1)

 

Huang et al. [10]

2052.6

369.8

 

< 0.001

2248.5

345.0

 

< 0.001

1856.7

282.4

 

< 0.001

 Bias2 (kcal/day)

408

 

(337.6; 478.4)

 

432.8

 

(324.6;

 

383.3

 

(287.5; 478.9)

 

 Percent deviation3

11.5

   

8.1

 

541.0)

 

8.1

   

Martin et al. [11]

1330.6

236.7

 

< 0.001

1428.2

228.0

 

< 0.001

1233

205.6

 

< 0.001

 Bias2 (kcal/day)

− 314

 

(−382.6; − 245.2)

 

−387.5

 

(− 491.9; − 283.0)

 

−240.4

 

(−327.4;-153.3)

 

 Percent deviation3

−9.1

   

−7.5

   

−5.6

   

Dietary Reference Intakes [12]

2086.8

372.5

 

< 0.001

2395.4

228.0

 

< 0.001

1778.1

186.7

 

< 0.001

 Bias2 (kcal/day)

442.2

 

(375.9; 508.4)

 

579.7

 

(495.3; 664.0)

 

304.7

 

(− 225.6; 383.7)

 

 Percent deviation3

13.3

   

14.0

   

7.8

   

Oxford [13]

1556.1

271.6

 

0.002

1761.7

218.9

 

0.201

1350.4

121.3

 

0.002

 Bias2 (kcal/day)

−88.5

 

(− 143.3; −33.6)

 

−54

 

(− 138.4; 30.3)

 

− 123

 

(− 195.8;-50.1)

 

 Percent deviation3

−3.2

   

−1.3

   

−3.4

   

Ikeda et al. [14]

1381.7

151.8

 

< 0.001

1458.6

147.6

 

< 0.001

1304.8

113.4

 

< 0.001

 Bias2 (kcal/day)

−262.9

 

(−321.9; −203.7)

 

− 357.1

 

(−436.1; − 278.0)

 

− 168.6

 

(− 246.7;-90.5)

 

 Percent deviation3

−8.8

   

−9.2

   

−4.4

   
  1. REE Resting energy expenditure; IC Indirect calorimetry; SD Standard deviation
  2. * Paired Student’s t-test to compare estimated and measured REE
  3. 1 (mean difference ± 1.96 SD of the difference)
  4. 2 (estimated − measured) (kcal in 24 h)
  5. 3 (difference/measured) × 100 (%)
Back to article page

BMC Nutrition

ISSN: 2055-0928

Contact us