Skip to main content

Table 5 Association of Vitamin D status with MetS in logistic regression analysis

From: Association of vitamin D status and cardio-metabolic risk factors in children and adolescents: the CASPIAN-V study

  Vitamin D status
Deficient1 Insufficient1 
OR CI95% P-value OR CI95% P-value
MetS Model 1 4.88 2.708.77 < 0.001 1.21 0.70–2.08 0.48
Model 2 4.76 2.648.60 < 0.001 1.19 0.69–2.05 0.51
Model 3 4.25 2.26–7.98 < 0.001 1.17 0.67–2.05 0.56
Abdominal Obesity Model 1 2.23 1.65–3.03 < 0.001 1.02 0.82–1.28 0.79
Model 2 2.20 1.62–2.99 < 0.001 1.01 0.81–1.26 1.01
Model 3 2.24 1.61–3.12 < 0.001 1.03 0.81–1.30 0.79
High SBP Model 1 .0.67 0.22–2.03 0.48 1.38 0.77–2.46 0.26
Model 2 0.66 0.22–2.01 0.47 1.35 0.76–2.41 0.30
Model 3 1.05 0.33–3.34 0.93 1.84 0.94–3.62 0.07
High DBP Model 1 0.93 0.59–1.46 0.76 0.77 0.58–1.03 0.08
Model 2 0.93 0.59–1.47 0.77 0.77 0.58–1.04 0.09
Model 3 1.11 0.68–1.80 0.66 0.83 0.60–1.14 0.26
High BP Model 1 0.93 0.59–1.45 0.75 0.86 0.65–1.14 0.30
Model 2 0.93 0.59–1.45 0.76 0.86 0.65–1.14 0.31
Model 3 1.10 0.68–1.77 0.67 0.92 0.68–1.25 0.60
Low HDL-C Model 1 1.70 1.26–2.31 < 0.001 1.39 1.13–1.70 < 0.001
Model 2 1.72 1.26–2.33 < 0.001 1.40 1.14–1.72 < 0.001
Model 3 1.65 1.18–2.30 < 0.001 1.40 1.12–1.74 < 0.001
High TG Model 1 1.36 1.01–1.84 0.04 0.90 0.74–1.11 0.34
Model 2 1.35 1.00–1.82 0.05 0.91 0.74–1.11 0.38
Model 3 1.28 0.92–1.77 0.13 0.88 0.71–1.09 0.27
High FBS Model 1 2.53 1.41–4.51 < 0.001 1.06 0.66–1.71 0.78
Model 2 2.56 1.43–4.57 < 0.001 1.06 0.66–1.71 0.78
Model 3 1.89 0.96–3.70 0.06 1.10 0.66–1.81 0.70
  1. 1In all model sufficient is reference group
  2. Model 1: crude model: Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex and living area; Model 3: additionally adjusted to SES; PA and ST
  3. MetS Metabolic syndrome, SBP Systolic blood pressure, DBP Diastolic blood pressure, FBS Fasting blood sugar, TG Triglycerides, HDL High density cholesterol, WC Waist circumference