Skip to main content

Table 8 Perceived satiety over different time points (n = 30)

From: Acute effect of Melon Manis Terengganu peel powder on glycemic response, perceived satiety, and food intake: a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes

Time (min)

0

30

60

90

120

Hunger (cm)

 Placebo

5.4 (4.8, 6.7)

0.0 (0.0, 1.5)

1.0 (0.0, 2.6)

2.9 (0.0, 4.5)

4.3 (1.9, 6.0)

 Intervention

6.0 (5.0, 7.4)

0.0 (0.0, 0.8)

0.0 (0.0, 2.1)

1.0 (0.0, 2.6)

2.3 (0.0, 4.3)

 p-value1

0.162

0.004

0.015

< 0.001

< 0.001

Fullness (cm)

 Placebo

2.9 (1.2, 5.0)

10.0 (6.9, 10.0)

8.3 (6.1, 9.4)

7.1 (5.0, 8.6)

6.1 (5.0, 7.5)

 Intervention

2.9 (1.2, 5.0)

10.0 (8.3, 10.0)

9.2 (8.0, 10.0)

8.4 (6.6, 9.4)

8.0 (6.3, 8.9)

 p-value1

0.889

0.004

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

Desire to eat (cm)

 Placebo

5.2 (5.0, 7.1)

0.0 (0.0, 3.1)

2.0 (0.0, 3.6)

3.3 (0.9, 4.6)

5.0 (2.3, 5.9)

 Intervention

6.2 (5.0, 7.2)

0.0 (0.0, 1.2)

1.1 (0.0, 2.4)

1.9 (0.0, 3.2)

2.6 (1.0, 4.1)

 p-value1

0.966

0.008

0.003

< 0.001

< 0.001

Prospective food consumption (cm)

 Placebo

5.0 (3.8, 7.1)

0.0 (0.0, 3.0)

2.0 (0.0, 3.9)

4.0 (1.7, 5.0)

4.8 (2.4, 6.4)

 Intervention

5.6 (4.8, 7.0)

0.0 (0.0, 2.1)

1.2 (0.0, 2.4)

2.0 (0.0, 2.9)

2.9 (1.0, 4.1)

 p-value1

0.110

0.182

0.003

< 0.001

< 0.001

Thirstiness (cm)

 Placebo

5.2 (3.9, 7.0)

2.1 (0.0, 4.4)

3.0 (2.0, 6.0)

4.8 (3.1, 6.5)

7.0 (4.4, 8.4)

 Intervention

5.6 (2.3, 8.9)

1.0 (0.0, 5.0)

3.0 (2.0, 6.0)

4.3 (2.1, 6.1)

5.0 (3.2, 8.0)

 p-value1

0.115

0.586

1.000

0.068

0.032

  1. The presented results are indicated as median values (interquartile range)
  2. 1Difference between intervention and placebo groups tested using Wilcoxon signed ranks test