Skip to main content

Table 2 Crude and adjusted intersectional disparities in consumption of fruits and vegetables combined, fruits, and vegetables

From: Disparities in fruit and vegetable intake at the intersection of gender and education in northern Sweden: a cross-sectional study

Disparity

Prevalence difference in inadequate intake a

Fruits and vegetables (combined)

Fruits

Vegetables

Crudeb

Adjustedc

Crudeb

Adjustedc

Crudeb

Adjustedc

pp. [CI]

p-value

pp. [CI]

p-value

pp. [CI]

p-value

pp. [CI]

p-value

pp. [CI]

p-value

pp. [CI]

p-value

Jointd

33.7 [32.1 to 35.4]

< 0.001

34.6 [32.9 to 36.3]

< 0.001

23.2 [21.6 to 24.8]

< 0.001

25.2 [23.5 to 26.8]

< 0.001

33.1 [31.5 to 34.7]

< 0.001

31.2 [29.5 to 32.9]

< 0.001

Referent gender

23.4 [21.3 to 25.5]

< 0.001

24.1 [22.0 to 26.2]

< 0.001

18.1 [16.1 to 20.1]

< 0.001

19.1 [17.1 to 21]

< 0.001

20.4 [18.3 to 22.5]

< 0.001

20 [17.9 to 22.1]

< 0.001

% of joint disparity

69

 

70

 

78

 

76

 

62

 

64

 

Referent education

15.2 [13.4 to 17.0]

< 0.001

16.1 [14.2 to 17.9]

< 0.001

7.9 [6.1 to 9.6]

< 0.001

10.2 [8.4 to 12]

< 0.001

17.3 [15.5 to 19.1]

< 0.001

15.7 [13.9 to 17.5]

< 0.001

% of joint disparity

45

 

46

 

34

 

40

 

52

 

50

 

Excess

−4.8 [-7.4 to −2.2]

< 0.001

−5.5 [-8.1 to −3.0]

< 0.001

− 2.8 [-5.2 to −0.3]

0.026

− 4.2 [-6.6 to −1.8]

0.001

−4.7 [-7.2 to − 2.2]

< 0.001

−4.6 [-7.1 to − 2.1]

< 0.001

% of joint disparity

−14

 

−16

 

−12

 

−17

 

−14

 

− 15

 
  1. a Estimates are percentage points (pp.) and 95% confidence intervals [CI] unless otherwise specified
  2. b Crude models including the cross-classified intersectional variable only
  3. c Adjusted models including the cross-classified intersectional variable adjusted for age, civil status, and region of residence
  4. d Joint disparity = Referent disparity for gender + Referent disparity for education + Excess intersectional disparity