Skip to main content

Table 4 Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis of factors affecting child feeding practices among children aged 6 − 23 months in remote Mugu district of Nepal (n = 318)

From: The factors influencing inappropriate child feeding practices among families receiving nutrition allowance in the Himalayan region of Nepal

Variables

Child feeding practices

Bivariate model cOR (95% CI)

P-value1

Multivariable model aOR (95% CI)

P-value2

Appropriate n (%)

Inappropriate n (%)

Socio-demographic characteristics

 Ethnicity

  Advantaged ethnic group

62 (71.3)

148 (64.1)

Ref

 

Ref

 

  Disadvantaged ethnic group

25 (28.7)

83 (35.9)

1.39 (0.81–2.37)

0.228

1.22 (0.65–2.29)

0.528

 Father's occupation

  Paid

27 (31.1)

41 (17.7)

Ref

 

Ref

 

  Unpaid

60 (68.9)

190 (82.3)

2.08 (1.18–3.67)

0.011*

1.18 (0.45–3.10)

0.723

 Family type

  Nuclear

34 (39.1)

72 (31.2)

Ref

 

Ref

 

  Extended

53 (60.9)

159 (68.8)

1.41 (0.84–2.36)

0.183

1.45 (0.81–2.59)

0.203

 Family monthly income

  Rs < 15 k (150 USD)

55 (63.2)

173 (74.9)

1.73 (1.02–2.94)

0.041*

1.19 (1.05–2.42)

0.045*

  Rs 15-50 k (150- 500 USD)

32 (36.8)

58 (25.1)

Ref

 

Ref

 

  Place of delivery

  Home Delivery

4 (4.6)

26 (11.3)

2.63 (0.89–7.77)

0.080

4.70 (1.03–21.31)

0.045*

  Health facility

83 (95.4)

205 (88.7)

Ref

 

Ref

 

 Distance between house and nearest health facility

  < 1 h

57 (65.5)

135 (58.4)

Ref

 

Ref

 

  > 1 h

30 (34.5)

96 (41.5)

1.35 (0.80–2.25)

0.251

1.60 (0.88–2.92)

0.119

 Place for child illness treatment

  Hospital

39 (37.9)

92 (39.8)

Ref

 

Ref

 

  Health post

39 (44.8)

96 (41.6)

0.88 (0.51–1.52)

0.654

0.75 (0.40–1.37)

0.353

  Traditional healers (Dhami, jhakri)

15 (17.3)

43 (18.6)

1.02 (0.50–2.09)

0.939

0.79 (0.36–1.72)

0.555

 Maternal factors

  Respondent’s age

   Below 25

52 (59.8)

136 (58.9)

1.06 (0.60–1.88)

0.832

1.06 (0.52–2.14)

0.860

   25 to 30

24 (27.6)

59 (25.5)

Ref

 

Ref

 

   30 and above

11 (12.6)

36 (15.6)

1.33 (0.58–3.03)

0.497

1.43 (0.60–3.40)

0.409

  Mothers’ education

   No education

32 (36.78)

111 (48.1)

1.49 (0.82–2.70)

0.284

1.31 (0.39–4.38)

0.652

   Primary

27 (31.1)

55 (23.8)

0.87 (0.46–1.66)

0.689

0.90 (0.27–3.00)

0.871

   Secondary/higher

28 (32.1)

65 (28.1)

Ref

 

Ref

 

  Mother's occupation

   Paid

25 (28.7)

29 (12.5)

Ref

 

Ref

 

   Unpaid

62 (71.3)

202 (87.5)

2.80 (1.53–5.14)

0.001*

2.56 (1.06–6.19)

0.036*

  Mother age at marriage in years

   < 20

45 (51.7)

135 (58.4)

Ref

 

Ref

 

   > 20

42 (48.3)

96 (41.5)

0.76 (0.46–1.25)

0.282

0.84 (0.34–2.05)

0.712

Age at first pregnancy

   < 20

33 (37.9)

105 (45.4)

1.36 (0.82–2.25)

0.228

1.09 (0.45–2.63)

0.841

   > 20

54 (62.1)

126 (54.6)

Ref

   

ANC visit during last pregnancy

   > 4 ANC visit

8 (9.2)

21 (9.1)

Ref

 

Ref

 

   < 4 ANC visit

79 (90.8)

210 (90.9)

0.98 (0.42–2.32)

0.977

0.31 (0.0.08–1.10)

0.070

 Child factors

  Sex of the child

   Male

48 (55.2)

105 (45.5)

Ref

 

Ref

 

   Female

39 (44.8)

126 (54.5)

1.47 (0.89–2.42)

0.123

1.61 (0.93–2.77)

0.085

  Age of child

   6–11 months

54 (62.1)

135 (58.4)

0.76 (0.39–1.47)

0.426

0.72 (0.35–1.48)

0.379

   12–17 months

18 (20.7)

47 (20.4)

0.79 (0.36–1.76)

0.580

0.77 (0.31–1.91)

0.585

   18–23 months

15 (17.2)

49 (21.2)

Ref

 

Ref

 

  Childbirth weight

   < 2.5 kg

14 (16.1)

43 (18.6)

1.19 (0.61–2.30)

0.601

1.18 (0.56–2.51)

0.651

   > 2.5 kg

73 (83.9)

188 (81.4)

Ref

 

Ref

 

  Expenditure of allowance on child nutrition

   No

16 (18.4)

38 (16.4)

0.87 (0.45–1.66)

0.681

0.88 (0.44–1.77)

0.731

   Yes

71 (81.6)

193 (83.6)

Ref

 

Ref

 
  1. cOR Crude odds ratio for unadjusted model, aOR adjusted odds ratio
  2. *denotes for statistically significant at p < 0.05
  3. 1Bivariate binary logistic regression analysis
  4. 2Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis