Skip to main content

Table 5 Nutrient adequacy from food alone by cognitive function status among males 60 + years of age

From: Higher intake of certain nutrients among older adults is associated with better cognitive function: an analysis of NHANES 2011–2014

  

Total CFT Composite Z-Score

  

Z-score Q1

 

Z-score Q2

 

Z-score Q3

Z-score Q4

  

n = 395

 

n = 301

 

n = 231

n = 198

  

% < EAR

Nutrient

EAR

% ± SE

 

% ± SE

 

% ± SE

% ± SE

 Vitamin A, RAE (μg)

625

54 ± 4.3

*

45 ± 5.4

*

30 ± 7.2

29 ± 3.9

 Vitamin E as alpha-tocopherol (mg)

12

89 ± 2.2

*

83 ± 3.7

*

70 ± 3.7

60 ± 5.6

 Vitamin D (D2 + D3) (μg)

10

94 ± 1.7

 

93 ± 2.4

 

92 ± 2.9

91 ± 2.5

 Vitamin C (mg)

75

54 ± 3.9

 

52 ± 5.3

 

54 ± 5.0

42 ± 5.3

 Thiamin (Vitamin B1) (mg)

1

11 ± 3.2

*

4 ± 1.4

 

 < 3

 < 3

 Riboflavin (Vitamin B2) (mg)

1.1

6 ± 1.7

*

 < 3

*

 < 3

 < 3

 Niacin (mg)

12

 < 3

 

 < 3

 

 < 3

 < 3

 Vitamin B6 (mg)

1.4

18 ± 4.0

*

8 ± 2.4

 

5 ± 2.0

 < 3

 Folate, DFE (μg)

320

17 ± 4.1

*

8 ± 2.2

 

4 ± 1.2

 < 3

 Vitamin B12 (μg)

2

6 ± 2.1

*

 < 3

 

 < 3

 < 3

 Calcium (mg)

800a

46 ± 2.9

*

39 ± 5.2

 

28 ± 2.5

24 ± 4.7

 Iron (mg)

6

 < 3

 

 < 3

 

 < 3

 < 3

 Magnesium (mg)

350

77 ± 2.6

*

68 ± 3.6

*

56 ± 4.7

46 ± 5.5

 Phosphorus (mg)

580

 < 3

 

 < 3

 

 < 3

 < 3

 Zinc (mg)

9.4

38 ± 4.6

*

24 ± 5.6

 

14 ± 3.8

13 ± 4.2

 Copper (mg)

0.7

4 ± 1.9

 

 < 3

 

 < 3

 < 3

 Selenium (μg)

45

 < 3

 

 < 3

 

 < 3

 < 3

 

AI

% > AI

 Vitamin K (μg)

120

27 ± 3.3

 

35 ± 3.8

*

42 ± 5.8

60 ± 9.5

 Total choline (mg)

550

 < 3

 

 < 3

 

7 ± 3.1

7 ± 2.2

 Potassium (mg)

3400

18 ± 2.6

 

27 ± 4.4

*

38 ± 6.7

46 ± 4.8

 Dietary fiber (g)

30

5 ± 1.5

 

6 ± 2.1

*

9 ± 2.7

16 ± 3.5

  1. Model 2: covariates for day of the week (weekday/weekend), sequence of the dietary recall (day 1 or 2), whether the participant reported use of any dietary supplement in the past 30 days, and age (60–69 y, 70–79 y, 80 + y), education, race/ethnicity, marital status, PIR, comorbidities (CHD, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, cancer), kidney function (GFR and albuminuria), BMI, smoking status, physical activity, and alcohol intake
  2. Estimated values of % < EAR or % > AI less than 3% or greater than 97% are expressed “ < 3” and “ > 97”, respectively, and the SE’s are not displayed, in accordance with the USDA’s practice in reporting nutrient adequacy. Statistical comparisons were conducted using the estimated values < 3% or > 97%
  3. *Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to Q4
  4. aEAR for males 51—70 y is 800 mg and the EAR for males 71 + y is 1000 mg. An EAR of 800 mg was selected to conservatively estimate the percent below the EAR