Criteria | Inclusion | Exclusion |
---|---|---|
Publication type | - Peer reviewed - Published papers and reports - Grey literature (working papers) | - Evidence/policy brief, conference - Unpublished abstract, study protocol - Meta-analysis, systematic or scoping review |
Publication year | 1980–2022 | < 1980 |
Language | English | Others |
Study type | - Qualitative, quantitative, or mix-method design - Impact evaluation | - Literature review - Feasibility study |
Intervention | Any agriculture intervention used as a livelihood strategy for food or income of the household such as: - Biofortification or harvest plus - Homestead production or vegetable garden - Irrigation or water management - Value chain/crop - Livestock and dairy - Agriculture extension or horticulture | Any agriculture intervention not used as a livelihood strategy (e.g., leisure activity not intended for food or income of the household) |
Comparator | -Studies comparing outcomes between different groups or difference before and after the intervention of the same group - Cross-sectional studies comparing beneficiaries with non-beneficiaries | - No comparator/control group |
Outcomes | - Food security - Health/disease - Diet and diet diversity - Micronutrient/macronutrient intake or status - Nutrition status/outcomes - Anthropometry | - Nutrition awareness, perception, attitudes - Food safety |
Settings | - Countries classified with a high political instability index, or - Country received an active humanitarian response from UN OCHA at the time of the intervention, and - The authors explicitly mentioned that the study was conducted in CHES, or had recently experienced episodes of violent conflict (refer to Table 1 for the full list of context-related search terms) and was still affected by the consequences of the crisis | Stable or non-humanitarian (including LMIC who did not experience conflict or humanitarian crises) |