Skip to main content
Download PDF

The association between empirical dietary inflammatory pattern and colorectal cancer risk: a case-control study

BMC Nutrition volume 9, Article number: 136 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in Iran. Inflammation plays an essential role in developing CRC. A dietary pattern called the empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP) has recently been designed based on the inflammatory potential of the diet. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the impact of EDIP on the risk of CRC.

Methods

The current case-control study was conducted on 142 controls and 71 CRC cases in three general hospitals and Hospital Cancer Organization in Tehran, Iran. We calculated EDIP by a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. The association between EDIP and CRC were evaluated by logistic regression. The level of significance was p < 0.05.

Results

The results revealed that people who were in the highest tertile of the EDIP had higher odds of CRC (in the adjusted model: odds ratio (OR) = 3.74; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38–10.14; P = 0.011).

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated the potential role of dietary-induced inflammation in developing CRC. In the current study, an increase in the intake of red meat, processed meats, and refined grains was observed in the higher EDIP tertiles compared to the lower tertiles. Consequently, to decrease the risk of CRC, it is recommended to reduce the consumption of these foods.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is slow-growing cancer that begins as a tissue growth or tumor in the inner lining of the colon or rectum [1]. CRC is a serious problem in the world’s public health and increasingly affects the population of Asian countries [2]. This is the third most common cancer in Iran [3] and the fourth and third most common in Iranian women and men, respectively [4]. In 2020, 11,942 new cases of CRC were reported in Iran [5].

Inflammation plays an essential role in developing CRC [6]. Specific nutrients and dietary components have been found to influence inflammation [7]. Studies have shown the role of sugar [8] and foods with a high concentration of saturated fat [9] in causing inflammation. On the contrary, it has been shown that tryptophan metabolites [10, 11] and fiber intake [12] can play a role in reducing inflammation. A study in the Iranian population also demonstrated that traditional dietary pattern that are associated with increased consumption of casserole, potato, legumes, hydrogenated fats, whole grains, tea, and refined grains can positively increase interleukin-6 (IL-6) [13]. There are two important indices to describe the inflammatory potential of a diet, including a dietary inflammatory index (DII) and an experimental dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP) [14, 15]. The DII is essentially a priori index that emphasizes the inflammatory potential of dietary nutrients [16], while EDIP is a posterior index that emphasizes the inflammatory potential of food groups, and this index seems to provide a new dimension of the inflammatory potential of the entire diet of people [17, 18]. In fact, EDIP has been designed based on the inflammatory potential of the diet (according to circulating concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers) [19].

The relationship of EDIP with metabolic syndrome [20], cognitive function [21], and metabolic phenotypes in overweight and obesity [15] has been investigated. However, there are limited studies on the relationship between EDIP and CRC risk [22, 23]. A cohort study aimed at investigating the association between EDIP and the risk of CRC showed a significant positive correlation [22]. Another study showed that the higher the diet’s inflammatory potential, the higher the risk of CRC [24].

Epidemiological studies have not consistently shown an association between the levels of inflammatory markers and the risk of CRC [25]. To the best of our knowledge, there is no study on the effect of EDIP on the risk of CRC among Iranian population. So, the present study aimed to investigate the impact of EDIP on the risk of CRC.

Methods

The present case-control study was conducted on three hospitals that included Shariati, Imam Hossein, and Ayatollah Taleghani and 19 CRC surgery departments of Imam Khomeini Hospital Cancer Organization in Tehran. The study sample size was calculated based on the odds ratio (OR) = 0.45, α = 0.05, and β = 0.20 based on Terry and et al. study [26].

The newly diagnosis cases with CRC were those who were 40 to 75 years old at the time of study, their diseases were confirmed pathologically. Characteristics of the control group included random selection from the same hospitals and hospitalization for acute and non-neoplastic conditions at the same time, without diet-related chronic diseases. The most common reasons for hospitalization included fractures and sprains, bone and joint disorders, and disc disorders. Each patient with CRC was matched in age and gender with two patients in the control group.

At first, 267 patients (89 cases and 178 controls) were assessed, and 24 participants were excluded by inclusion and exclusion criteria (8 cases and 16 controls). In addition, 10 cases and 20 controls were excluded for incomplete food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), unwillingness, and total energy intake (out of mean ± 3 standard deviations (SDs)). Finally, 71 participants in the case and 142 participants in the control group were included for statistical analyses. This study was approved by the Medical Research and Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Science (IR.SUMS.SCHEANUT.REC.1401.011). Details of the current study have been previously published [8, 27].

Dietary assessment

To evaluate dietary intake, we used a semi-quantitative FFQ that included 168 foods and drinks (with standard portion sizes). Based on previous studies, it has been determined that this FFQ has good reliability and reproducibility [28, 29].

The participants stated the frequency of consumption of one meal of each food item daily, weekly, monthly and yearly before CRC diagnosis. Then, the data obtained from their answers were converted into daily consumption frequency. After the portion size of each food item consumed was converted to grams, the consumption amount of each food item in grams was obtained by multiplying the portion size by the number of daily consumption. The edible portion of foods was determined using household measurement guidelines [30]. The nutrient composition of Iranian food data [31] and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) food composition data were applied to determine the energy value of food [32]. Total energy intake was estimated by adding the energy value of each food to the FFQ. The Nutritionist IV was applied to calculate energy and intake of nutrient [33].

Tabung et al.‘s study was used to calculate the EDIP score [34]. This study included 18 food items. Diagnostic biomarkers interleukin-6 (IL-6), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were used to make this dietary index. Each item was assigned a specific weight based on its relationship with biomarker levels. We did not include alcoholic beverages such as wine and beer in the calculation of scores because their consumption is not common and may have been underreported due to religious considerations in our study population. Because we did not have any food item as a low-energy drink in our FFQ, this item was also removed from the questionnaire. So, we calculated the EDIP score based on 15 instead of 18, including red meat (lamb or beef), processed meat (sausage), organ meat (calf, beef, or chicken liver), fish (fish or canned tuna), refined grains (white rice, biscuits, white bread, vermicelli or pasta), vegetables (cooked mushrooms, green peppers, mixed vegetables, zucchini, eggplant, cucumber), dark yellow vegetables (squash or carrots), green leafy vegetables (spinach, lettuce or cabbage), tomatoes as a pro-inflammatory group, tea, coffee, high-energy and low-energy drinks (carbonated drinks with sugar, cola with sugar, fruit drinks, fruit juice (apple juice, cantaloupe juice, orange juice or other fruit juices)), snacks (potato chips or crackers), and the anti-inflammatory group of pizza. The proposed weights and inflammatory score of each food groups were multiplied by the average daily intake of each food item, and then all the weight values were added up. Finally, to avoid the large scores, they were all summed up and divided by 1000. A higher score indicates a pro-inflammatory diet in EDIP and vice versa [35].

Covariates

The case and control groups were interviewed by skilled interviewers. Information obtained from this interview included socio-demographic characteristics, physical activity, family history of CRC, medication information (taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), vitamin/mineral supplements), smoking habits, cooking methods, and dietary intake.

To accurately measure the participants’ weight, they were asked to wear minimal clothing and without shoes, and they were weighed with an accuracy of 0.1 kg. SECA scale (Germany) body measuring device with 0.1 cm accuracy was used for height measurement. Their height was measured while standing without shoes. Recumbent length was acquired for hospitalized patients.

The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (in kg) divided by the square of height (in meters) and classified according to the World Health Organization standard for adults [36]. A valid self-report questionnaire was utilized to measure the level of physical activity of the individuals. This questionnaire contains the level of physical activity of the participant’s metabolic equivalent of task (MET)-hours/day [37]. Physical activity was done based on the activities performed in the year before the CRC diagnosis of the cases or the year before the interview of the controls.

Statistical analysis

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was utilized to evaluate the normality of variables. The chi-square test was used to assess the relationship between classified variables. Mann-Whitney or independent samples T-test was used to determine the association between continuous variables. Also, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to evaluate food group intake across the tertiles of EDIP. The association between EDIP and CRC were evaluated by logistic regression and adjusted for energy and fiber intake, smoking, physical activity, BMI, family history of CRC, household income, education level, the common way of cooking meat, and taking ibuprofen, aspirin, acetaminophen and mineral supplement use. SPSS software (version 26.0) was used for statistical analysis. The level of significance was p < 0.05.

Results

The baseline characteristics of study population are shown in Table 1. As can be seen, the mean of EDPI score, BMI, and age in the case group was higher than in the control group but it was not statistically significant. Also, the energy intake and physical activity were not significantly different between the case and control groups. However, fiber intake (P < 0.001), family history of CRC (P = 0.0017) and taking aspirin (P = 0.016), acetaminophen (P = 0.004) and mineral supplement (P = 0.015) illustrated a significant differences between the case and control groups.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study population
Full size table

Based on Table 2, among the variables, tomatoes (P = 0.021), red meat (P = 0.011), processed meat (P = 0.021), refined grains (P < 0.001), and pizza (P < 0.001) had significant differences across the tertiles of EDIP.

Table 2 Food group intake across the tertiles of EDIP
Full size table

Table 3 displays the association between EDPI and CRC. The second logistic regression model was adjusted for energy and fiber intake, smoking, physical activity, BMI, family history of CRC, the common way of cooking meat, and taking ibuprofen, aspirin, acetaminophen and mineral supplement use. According to this model, the chance of developing CRC in the last tertile of EDIP was significantly higher than in the first tertile (OR = 3.74; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38–10.14; P = 0.011).

Table 3 Association between EDIP and colorectal cancer
Full size table

Discussion

In the current case-control study, we examined the association between the inflammatory potential of the diet, as measured by EDIP, and developing CRC odds. The findings showed that greater adherence to EDIP was associated with a higher odds of CRC. Also, the results indicated that more adherence to this dietary pattern was associated with more intake of red meat, processed meats, and refined grains. Therefore, limiting the consumption of the mentioned foods may play a role in reducing the odds of CRC.

EDIP was recently developed, and its validity was evaluated in two independent cohorts of men and women [34]. It has been shown that EDIP could remarkably anticipate the levels of inflammatory markers [34]. This inflammation-related dietary pattern reveals the inflammatory impacts of foods in a total diet. Also, the development of an inflammatory index based on food groups make possible the provision of nutritional recommendations to alleviate diet-induced inflammation compared to using a single nutrient or food [15].

As previously mentioned, the findings showed a positive association between EDIP and CRC odds. Our findings are in line with previous research. Tabung et al. demonstrated that the higher EDIP was positively related to the CRC risk [22]. Also, another study by Tabung et al. revealed that higher dietary inflammatory index (DII) scores were associated with an increased risk of CRC [38]. Moreover, a case-control study by Shivappa et al. indicated a positive relationship between the inflammatory potential of the diet and the risk of CRC [39]. A meta-analysis study on case-control studies also demonstrated that greater adherence to DII was associated with an increased risk of CRC (relative risk = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.16–1.38) [40].

The precise mechanisms by which inflammation leads to CRC are gradually becoming elucidated [41]. The transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), which is involved in many inflammatory pathways, is one of the well-known mechanisms by which chronic inflammation causes cancer [42]. TNF-α also plays a role in developing CRC. TNF-α, a pro-inflammatory cytokine, has a positive role in activating NF-κB [43]. Also, the role of pro-inflammatory mediators such as cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) has been shown in cancer progression. Moreover, COX-2-derived PGE2 increases the growth of colonic tumor by silencing DNA repair genes and specific tumor suppressors by DNA methylation in colonic epithelial tumor cells [44].

As shown in the current study, higher EDIP scores were related to more intake of red meat and processed meats. Processed meats and various components of red have been proposed to contribute to chronic inflammation and the risk of disease, such as nitrosamines, heme iron, and advanced glycation end products [45]. Also, fat intake is high in a diet rich in processed meats and red meat. Studies have indicated the role of dietary fat in developing CRC [46, 47]. High-fat intake stimulates the secretion of secondary bile acids in the intestine. The role of bile acids in tumor formation has been shown [48]. Moreover, heterocyclic amines (HCAs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are other compounds that induce carcinogenesis through mutation induction. These compounds are found in red meat and processed meats [49,50,51].

Also, more intake of refined grains was observed in people who had more adherence to EDIP. An association between increased consumption of refined grains and the risk of CRC has been shown [52]. Chatenoud et al. reported that the highest intake of refined grains compared to the lowest intake was associated with ORs of 1.3 for rectal cancer and 1.5 for colon cancer [53]. Further, a study by Levi et al. indicated a positive association between refined grains and CRC (OR = 1.32 for increasing one serving/day) [54].

The role of other dietary patterns on inflammation has also been investigated. A systematic review study on interventional and observational studies showed that there is an inverse relationship between dietary patterns such as Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diets, and the Mediterranean diets and pro-inflammatory biomarkers [55]. Also, in a prospective cohort study on the older adults, it was shown that a dietary pattern high in vegetables, fruits, fish, poultry, whole grains, and low-fat dairy products is associated with a reduction in systemic inflammation [56]. Moreover, Nettleton et al. revealed an inverse relationship between a ‘vegetables and fish’ pattern and IL-6, an inverse relationship between a ‘whole grains and fruit’ pattern and CRP and IL-6, and a positive association between a ‘fats and processed meats’ pattern and CRP and IL-6 [57]. In general, based on studies, it can be found that a “healthy” dietary pattern, high in fish, poultry, vegetables, whole grains, and fruits and low in sweetened beverages, sweets, desserts, red and processed meat, high-fat dairy products, and refined grains are associated with lower levels of systemic inflammation compared to other dietary patterns [56].

The strengths of the present study are that we controlled for several potential confounding factors for examining the relationship between EDIP and CRC risk. A valid and reliable questionnaire was also used to collect data. However, although the effect of several confounding variables was adjusted, there might be other confounding variables that we did not consider in the study. Also, like other case-control studies that examine dietary intake before diagnosis, this study may have recall bias.

Conclusion

This case-control study demonstrated the potential role of dietary-induced inflammation in developing CRC. In the present study, an increase in the intake of red meat, processed meats, and refined grains was observed in the higher EDIP tertiles compared to the lower tertiles. Consequently, to decrease the risk of CRC, it is recommended to reduce their consumption. Also, it is possible participants change their diet after diagnosis of each diseases and improve their usual diet, for this reason, dietary intake assessed after CRC diagnosis and newly CRC diagnostic cases were selected. Since this study was conducted in Iran, the results cannot be generalized to other populations. Therefore, more research is necessary to clarify the role of this dietary pattern in CRC risk.

Data Availability

To protect study participant privacy, data cannot be shared openly, but data are available through a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Marley AR, Nan H. Epidemiology of Colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet. 2016;7(3):105.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wong MC, Ding H, Wang J, Chan PS, Huang J. Prevalence and risk factors of Colorectal cancer in Asia. Intestinal Res. 2019;17(3):317–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maajani K, Khodadost M, Fattahi A, Shahrestanaki E, Pirouzi A, Khalili F, Fattahi H. Survival rate of Colorectal cancer in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Pac J cancer Prevention: APJCP. 2019;20(1):13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rafiemanesh H, Pakzad R, Abedi M, Kor Y, Moludi J, Towhidi F, Makhsosi BR, Salehiniya H. Colorectal cancer in Iran: epidemiology and morphology trends. EXCLI J. 2016;15:738.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/364-iran-islamic-republic-of-fact-sheets.pdf.

  6. Tomasello G, Tralongo P, Damiani P, Sinagra E, Di Trapani B, Zeenny MN, Hussein IH, Jurjus A, Leone A. Dismicrobism in inflammatory bowel Disease and Colorectal cancer: changes in response of colocytes. World J Gastroenterology: WJG. 2014;20(48):18121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang Y, Zeng M, Zhang L, Shi J, Yang Y, Liu F, Sun L, Xiao L. Dietary inflammatory potential is associated with sarcopenia among chronic Kidney Disease population. Front Nutr. 2022;9:420.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bentyaghoob S, Dehghani F, Alimohammadi A, Shateri Z, Kahrizsangi MA, Nejad ET, Nouri M, Rashidkhani B. Oxidative balance score and dietary phytochemical index can reduce the risk of Colorectal cancer in Iranian population. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023;23(1):183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Shen W, Gaskins HR, McIntosh MK. Influence of dietary fat on intestinal microbes, inflammation, barrier function and metabolic outcomes. J Nutr Biochem. 2014;25(3):270–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zelante T, Iannitti RG, Cunha C, De Luca A, Giovannini G, Pieraccini G, Zecchi R, D’Angelo C, Massi-Benedetti C, Fallarino F. Tryptophan catabolites from microbiota engage aryl hydrocarbon receptor and balance mucosal reactivity via interleukin-22. Immunity. 2013;39(2):372–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Puccetti P, Grohmann U. IDO and regulatory T cells: a role for reverse signalling and non-canonical NF-κB activation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(10):817–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Koh A, De Vadder F, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Bäckhed F. From dietary fiber to host physiology: short-chain fatty acids as key bacterial metabolites. Cell. 2016;165(6):1332–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Esmaillzadeh A, Kimiagar M, Mehrabi Y, Azadbakht L, Hu FB, Willett WC. Dietary patterns and markers of systemic inflammation among Iranian women. J Nutr. 2007;137(4):992–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shivappa N, Hébert JR, Steck SE, Safari A, Sedaghat F, Rashidkhani B. Dietary inflammatory index and odds of Colorectal cancer in a case-control study from Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prevention: APJCP. 2018;19(7):1999.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Soltani S, Moslehi N, Hosseini-Esfahani F, Vafa M. The association between empirical dietary inflammatory pattern and metabolic phenotypes in overweight/obese adults. Int J Endocrinol Metabolism 2018, 16(2).

  16. Wirth MD, Burch J, Shivappa N, Violanti JM, Burchfiel CM, Fekedulegn D, Andrew ME, Hartley TA, Miller DB, Mnatsakanova A. Association of a dietary inflammatory index with inflammatory indices and metabolic syndrome among police officers. J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56(9):986–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Tabung FK, Smith-Warner SA, Chavarro JE, Fung TT, Hu FB, Willett WC, Giovannucci EL. An empirical dietary inflammatory pattern score enhances prediction of circulating inflammatory biomarkers in adults. J Nutr. 2017;147(8):1567–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Shakeri Z, Mirmiran P, Khalili-Moghadam S, Hosseini-Esfahani F, Ataie-Jafari A, Azizi F. Empirical dietary inflammatory pattern and risk of metabolic syndrome and its components: Tehran lipid and glucose study. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2019;11:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tabung FK, Giovannucci EL, Giulianini F, Liang L, Chandler PD, Balasubramanian R, Manson JE, Cespedes Feliciano EM, Hayden KM, Van Horn L. An empirical dietary inflammatory pattern score is associated with circulating inflammatory biomarkers in a multi-ethnic population of postmenopausal women in the United States. J Nutr. 2018;148(5):771–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Pang T, Alman AC, Gray HL, Basu A, Shi L, Snell-Bergeon JK. Empirical dietary inflammatory pattern and metabolic syndrome: prospective association in participants with and without type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in the coronary artery calcification in type 1 Diabetes (CACTI) study. Nutr Res. 2021;94:1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. van Melo D, Samieri C, Grodstein F, Seshadri S. Empirical dietary inflammatory pattern scores are not associated with worse cognitive performance in the nurses’ Health Study. J Nutr. 2022;152(11):2526–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tabung FK, Liu L, Wang W, Fung TT, Wu K, Smith-Warner SA, Cao Y, Hu FB, Ogino S, Fuchs CS. Association of dietary inflammatory potential with Colorectal cancer risk in men and women. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(3):366–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Eckert-Dreher RG, dos Santos DC, Zibetti AW, Felipe KB, Wilhelm-Filho D, Pedrosa RC. Dietary patterns and empirical Dietary Inflammatory Index in Southern Brazil and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: a case-control study. Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2020;11(4):281–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma I, Zhu Y, Woodrow JR, Mulay S, Parfrey PS, Mclaughlin JR, Hebert JR, Shivappa N, Li Y, Zhou X. Inflammatory diet and risk for Colorectal cancer: a population-based case–control study in Newfoundland. Can Nutr. 2017;42:69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Garcia-Anguita A, Kakourou A, Tsilidis KK. Biomarkers of inflammation and immune function and risk of Colorectal cancer. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2015;11(5):250–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Terry P, Giovannucci E, Michels KB, Bergkvist L, Hansen H, Holmberg L, Wolk A. Fruit, vegetables, dietary fiber, and risk of Colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93(7):525–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kahrizsangi MA, Ebrahimi Z, Shateri Z, Mansouri F, Zangene A, Rajabzadeh-Dehkordi M, Nouri M, Rashidkhani B. Carbohydrate quality indices and Colorectal cancer risk: a case-control study. BMC Cancer. 2023;23(1):347.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Esfahani FH, Asghari G, Mirmiran P, Azizi F. Reproducibility and relative validity of food group intake in a food frequency questionnaire developed for the Tehran lipid and glucose study. J Epidemiol. 2010;20(2):150–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mirmiran P, Esfahani FH, Mehrabi Y, Hedayati M, Azizi F. Reliability and relative validity of an FFQ for nutrients in the Tehran lipid and glucose study. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(5):654–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ghaffarpour M, Houshiar-Rad A, Kianfar H. The manual for household measures, cooking yields factors and edible portion of foods. Tehran: Nashre Olume Keshavarzy. 1999;7(213):42–58.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Azar M. In: Sarkisian E, editor. Food composition table of Iran. Tehran: National Nutrition and Food Research Institute, Shaheed Beheshti University; 1980. p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bodner-Montville J, Ahuja JK, Ingwersen LA, Haggerty ES, Enns CW, Perloff BP. USDA food and nutrient database for dietary studies: released on the web. J Food Compos Anal. 2006;19:100–S107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nutritionist I. N-squared computing. Silverton: Nutritionist IV 1998.

  34. Tabung FK, Smith-Warner SA, Chavarro JE, Wu K, Fuchs CS, Hu FB, Chan AT, Willett WC, Giovannucci EL. Development and validation of an empirical dietary inflammatory index. J Nutr. 2016;146(8):1560–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Farhadnejad H, Tehrani AN, Jahromi MK, Teymoori F, Mokhtari E, Salehi-Sahlabadi A, Mirmiran P. The association between dietary inflammation scores and non-alcoholic fatty Liver Diseases in Iranian adults. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022;22(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Status WP. The use and interpretation of anthropometry. WHO technical report series 1995, 854(9).

  37. Biernat E, Stupnicki R, Lebiedziński B, Janczewska L. Assessment of physical activity by applying IPAQ questionnaire. Phys Educ Sport. 2008;52(2):83–9.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tabung FK, Steck SE, Ma Y, Liese AD, Zhang J, Caan B, Hou L, Johnson KC, Mossavar-Rahmani Y, Shivappa N. The association between dietary inflammatory index and risk of Colorectal cancer among postmenopausal women: results from the women’s Health Initiative. Cancer Causes Control. 2015;26(3):399–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shivappa N, Zucchetto A, Montella M, Serraino D, Steck SE, La Vecchia C, Hébert JR. Inflammatory potential of diet and risk of Colorectal cancer: a case–control study from Italy. Br J Nutr. 2015;114(1):152–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fan Y, Jin X, Man C, Gao Z, Wang X. Meta-analysis of the association between the inflammatory potential of diet and Colorectal cancer risk. Oncotarget. 2017;8(35):59592.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Carter AB, Misyak SA, Hontecillas R, Bassaganya-Riera J. Dietary modulation of inflammation-induced colorectal cancer through PPAR. PPAR research 2009, 2009.

  42. Naugler WE, Karin M. NF-κB and cancer—identifying targets and mechanisms. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2008;18(1):19–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Balkwill F. TNF-α in promotion and progression of cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006;25(3):409–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Dubois RN. Role of inflammation and inflammatory mediators in Colorectal cancer. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2014;125:358.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim Y, Keogh J, Clifton P. A review of potential metabolic etiologies of the observed association between red meat consumption and development of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Metabolism. 2015;64(7):768–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Boyle P, Zaiudze D, Smans M. Descriptive epidemiology of Colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 1985;36(1):9–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Reddy BS. Dietary fat and colon Cancer: animal model studies. Lipids. 1992;27(10):807–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Demeyer D, Mertens B, De Smet S, Ulens M. Mechanisms linking Colorectal cancer to the consumption of (processed) red meat: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016;56(16):2747–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. de Kok TM, van Maanen JM. Evaluation of fecal mutagenicity and Colorectal cancer risk. Mutat Research/Reviews Mutat Res. 2000;463(1):53–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Goldman R, Shields PG. Food mutagens. J Nutr. 2003;133(3):965S–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Cross AJ, Sinha R. Meat-related mutagens/carcinogens in the etiology of Colorectal cancer. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2004;44(1):44–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tayyem RF, Bawadi HA, Shehadah I, Agraib LM, Al-Awwad NJ, Heath DD, Bani-Hani KE. Consumption of whole grains, refined cereals, and legumes and its association with Colorectal cancer among jordanians. Integr cancer Ther. 2016;15(3):318–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Chatenoud L, La Vecchia C, Franceschi S, Tavani A, Jacobs DR Jr, Parpinel MT, Soler M, Negri E. Refined-cereal intake and risk of selected cancers in Italy. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70(6):1107–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Levi F, Pasche C, La Vecchia C, Lucchini F, Franceschi S. Food groups and Colorectal cancer risk. Br J Cancer. 1999;79(7):1283–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Hart MJ, Torres SJ, McNaughton SA, Milte CM. Dietary patterns and associations with biomarkers of inflammation in adults: a systematic review of observational studies. Nutr J. 2021;20(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Anderson AL, Harris TB, Tylavsky FA, Perry SE, Houston DK, Lee JS, Kanaya AM, Sahyoun NR. Dietary patterns, insulin sensitivity and inflammation in older adults. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66(1):18–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Nettleton JA, Steffen LM, Mayer-Davis EJ, Jenny NS, Jiang R, Herrington DM, Jacobs DR Jr. Dietary patterns are associated with biochemical markers of inflammation and endothelial activation in the multi-ethnic study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(6):1369–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank all field investigators, staff, and participants of the present study.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nutrition and Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran

    Zainab Shateri

  2. Students’ Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Maede Makhtoomi, Fatemeh Mansouri, Milad Rajabzadeh-dehkordi & Mehran Nouri

  3. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Maede Makhtoomi & Mehran Nouri

  4. Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Fatemeh Mansouri

  5. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Milad Rajabzadeh-dehkordi & Mehran Nouri

  6. Department of Community Nutrition, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Bahram Rashidkhani

Authors
  1. Zainab Shateri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maede Makhtoomi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fatemeh Mansouri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Milad Rajabzadeh-dehkordi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mehran Nouri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bahram Rashidkhani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z.S, M.M, F.M, M.R.D and M.N; Contributed to writing the first draft. M.N and B.R; Contributed to all data and statistical analysis, and interpretation of data. M.N and B.R.; Contributed to the research concept, supervised the work, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahram Rashidkhani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Medical Research and Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Science (IR.SUMS.SCHEANUT.REC.1401.011). All participants read and signed the informed consent form.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shateri, Z., Makhtoomi, M., Mansouri, F. et al. The association between empirical dietary inflammatory pattern and colorectal cancer risk: a case-control study. BMC Nutr 9, 136 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-023-00797-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-023-00797-8

Keywords

BMC Nutrition

ISSN: 2055-0928

Contact us