Skip to main content

Table 3 General characteristics of UK dietary assessment tools and their validation studies in children and adolescents

From: Measuring energy, macro and micronutrient intake in UK children and adolescents: a comparison of validated dietary assessment tools

Test Dietary Assessment Tool

Validation Studies

First author and year

Administration method

Nutrient database

First author and year

Macronutrients validated

Micronutrients validated

Food groups included (Y/N)

Life stage, age range Cohort (M/F)

Time span

Statistical Method Used

Test DAT

Reference method

Weighed food diary

Davies [19] (1994)

By adult proxy

MCW4

Davies [19] (1994)

E

0

N

Children & Infants (1.5–4.5 yr)

81 (42/39)

4d consecutive

10d (DLW)

Mean Difference (relative bias); CC (NR); LOA

Livingstone [20]

(1992)

Self (12–18 yr)); By adult proxy (7 + yr)

MCW4 inc. supplementary food composition data

Livingstone [20] (1992)

E

0

N

Children & Adolescents (7–18 yr)

58 (29/29)

7d consecutive

10 – 14d (DLW)

Mean Difference LOA

Estimated food diary

Lanigan [21] (2001)

By adult proxy

COMP-EAT v.5

Lanigan [21] (2001)

E, PRO, FAT, CHO

0

N

Infants (6–24 months)

DLW – 21

Weighed Food Diary – 72

5d

7d (DLW) & 5d (Food Diary)

Mean Difference LOA

Semi-weighed food diary

Holmes [22] (2008)

Self (12+ yr) By adult proxy (< 5 yr), adult proxy / child combined (6-11 yr) Interview

MCW5

Holmes [22] (2008)

E, PRO, FAT, CHO, DF

RET, Vit B1, B9, C, Ca, Fe

N

Children (2–10) & adolescents (11-17 yr)

124 (70/52)

4d

4d (weighed food diary)

Mean Difference; LOAc

Dietary recall

Carter [23]

(myfood24)

(2015)

Self; Interview

MCW7

Albar [24] (2016)

aAll assessed

Sodium

Y

Adolescents

75 (37/38)

2d (non-consecutive)

2d (non-consecutive 24-h recall)

Mean Difference; CC (ICC); Cross Classification LOA; Weighted Cohen’s kappa

bFoster [25] (INTAKE24)

(2013)

Self

MCW

Bradley [ [11] (2016)

E, PRO, FAT,CHO, NSP, SUG,

Vit C, calcium, iron

Y

Adolescents

4d (Results reported data on participants completing any number of days)

4d recall (Results reported data on participants completing any number of days)

Mean ratios; LOA (ratio)b

Holmes [22] (2008)

Self (12+ yr) By adult proxy (< 5 yr), adult proxy / child combined (6-11 yr) Interview

MCW5

Holmes [22] (2008)

E, PRO, FAT, CHO, DF

RET, Vit B1, B9, C, Ca, Fe

N

Children (2–10_& adolescents (11-17 yr)

124 (70/52

4d

4d (weighed food diary)

Mean Difference; LOAc

Johnson [26] (1996)

Interview

Food Intake Analysis

Reilly [27] (2001)

E

0

N

Children (3–4 yr)

41 (23/18)

3d (MPR)

7d (DLW)

Mean Difference; LOA

Montgomery [28] (2005)

E

0

N

Children (4.5–7 yr)

63 (32/31)

3d (Inc. 1 weekend d)

2d (DLW)

Mean Difference (bias); LOA

Johnson [26] (1996)

E

0

N

Children (4–7 yr)

(12/12)

3d (MPR)

14d (DLW)

Mean Difference; LOA

Food frequency questionnaire

McKeown [29] (EPIC FFQ)

(2001)

Self

MCW

Lietz [30]

(2002)

E, PRO, FAT, CHO,

Ca, K, Na

N

Adolescents (11.8–13.2 yr)

50 (32/18)

1d

7d (Food diary)

Mean Difference; CC (S); Cross Classification; LOA

bRobinson [31]

(2007)

By adult proxy

MCW5

Marriot [32]

(2008)

E, PRO, FAT, CHO, SUG

aAll assessed

N

Infants (6 months)

50 (25/25)

1d

4d (weighed food diaries)

Mean Difference (%); CC(S); LOAb

bRobinson [31]

(2007)

By adult proxy

MCW5

Marriot [33]

(2009)

E, PRO, FAT, CHO, SUG

aAll assessed

N

Infants (12 months)

50 (27/23)

1d

4d (weighed food diaries)

Mean Difference (%); CC (S); LOAb

Food checklist

Cade [34]

(CADET)

(2006)

Combination of Self and adult proxy (parent, school dinner supervisor)

DANTE

Cade [34]

(2006)

aAll assessed

Ca, Fe, B9, K, Vit C

Y

Children (3–7 yr)

180 (100/80)

1d

1d (weighed food diary)

Mean Difference; CC (S); LOA

Christian [35]

(2015)

E, PRO, CHO, FAT,SUG, DF

Na, Ca, Vit C

Y

Children (8–11 yr)

67 (33/34)

1d

1d (weighed food diary)

Mean Difference; CC (P) LOA

Holmes [22]

(2008)

Self (12+ yr) By adult proxy (< 5 yr), adult proxy / child combined (6-11 yr) Interview

MCW5

Holmes [22]

(2008)

E, PRO, FAT, CHO, DF

RET, Vit B1, B9, C, Ca, Fe

N

Children (2–10) & adolescents (11-17 yr)

124 (70/52)

4d

4d (weighed food diary)

Mean Difference; LOAb

Diet history

Livingstone [20] (1992)

Self (12–18 yr)); By adult proxy (7 + yr)

MCW4

Livingstone [20]

(1992)

E

0

N

Children & Adolescents (3–18 yr)

78 (41/37)

1d

10-14d (DLW)

Mean Difference; LOA

  1. aAll assessed = Macronutrients: E (Energy), PRO (Protein), UR (Urinary Nutrogen), CHO, (Carbohydrate) FAT, DF (Dietary Fibre / NSP),; MUFA (Monounsaturated Fatty Acids), PUFA (Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids), SFA (Saturated Fatty Acids), SUG (Sugar). Ca Calcium, Na Sodium, Fe Iron, K Potassium, RET Retinol
  2. bResults expressed as a ratio or percentage so not shown on the summary plots
  3. cLOA calculated from information reported
  4. MCW = McCance & Widdowson; DLW (Doubly Labelled Water); CC (Correlation coefficient), S (Spearman), P (Pearson); ICC(Intra-class correlation coefficient); LOA (Limits of Agreement)