Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the patients

From: Association between delivery methods for enteral nutrition and physical status among older adults

 

Nasogastric

(n = 138)

PEG

(n = 43)

P

Age (years)

82 [78, 87]

84 [76, 88]

0.78

Female

55 (39.9)

17 (39.5)

0.97

BMI < 18.5a

32 (35.2)

14 (45.2)

0.32

Diagnosis

 Stroke/neurological diseases

61 (44.2)

24 (55.8)

0.09

 Respiratory diseases

27 (19.6)

12 (27.9)

 Malignancy

21 (15.2)

4 (9.3)

 Others

29 (21.0)

3 (7.0)

Dementia

26 (18.8)

6 (14.0)

0.46

Updated Charlson Comorbidity Index

 0–2

122 (88.4)

39 (90.7)

0.44

 3–5

10 (7.3)

1 (2.3)

  ≥ 6

6 (4.4)

3 (7.0)

Serum albumin (mg/dL) b

  < 2.5

31 (22.5)

4 (9.3)

0.06

Severity (A score)c

  < 2

67 (48.6)

20 (46.5)

0.82

  ≥ 2

71 (51.5)

23 (53.5)

Physical function (B score) d

  < 7

17 (12.3)

13 (30.2)

< 0.01*

 7–9

121 (87.7)

30 (69.8)

Received physical restraints

86 (62.3)

27 (62.8)

0.96

Received physical therapy

133 (96.4)

40 (93.0)

0.40

Daily intake of enteral nutrition (kcal)

1065 [809, 1200]

900 [645, 1107]

0.03*

Estimated energy requirement (kcal)a

1536 [1320, 1714]

1284 [1135, 1699]

< 0.01*

Geriatric nutritional risk indexe

80 [71, 87]

80 [75, 85]

0.78

  1. Data are presented as number (%) except for age, daily intake of enteral nutrition, estimated energy requirement, and Geriatric nutritional risk index, which are presented as median [interquartile range]
  2. *P < 0.05
  3. a33% missing
  4. b5% missing
  5. cA score of ≥2 means severe disease
  6. dB score of 7–9 means moderately dependent, whereas B score of 0-6 means less dependent
  7. e35% missing