Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study participants

From: Effect of a nutrition education programme on the metabolic syndrome in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients at a level 5 Hospital in Kenya: “a randomized controlled trial”

Parameter

 

NEP

NE

C

P Value

Mean ± SD or n (%)

Mean ± SD or n (%)

Mean ± SD or n (%)

Age in yearsa

 

57.0 ± 10.88

55.0 ± 12.34

56.0 ± 11.97

0.76

YLWDa

 

6.0 ± 7.10

7.0 ± 6.93

7.0 ± 6.63

0.63

Genderb

Male

17(33.3)

24(47.1)

21(41.2)

0.37

Female

34(66.7)

27(52.9)

30(58.8)

 

Maritalbstatus

Married

45(88.2)

43(84.3)

41(80.4)

0.53

Divorced/separated/windowed

6(11.8)

8(15.7)

10(19.6)

 

Incomeb

< 1000

26 (51.0

21 (41.2)

25 (49.0)

0.17

 

1001–5000

13 (25.5)

7 (13.7)

12(23.5)

 
 

5001–10,000

5 (9.8)

9 (17.6)

9 (17.6)

 
 

> 10,000

7 (13.7)

14 (27.5)

5(9.8)

 

Occupationb

Formal employment

2(3.9)

1(2.0)

3(5.9)

0.75

 

Casual employment

1(2.0)

4(7.8)

5(9.8)

 
 

Farming

22(43.1)

21(41.2)

20(39.2)

 
 

Business

15(29.4)

18(35.3)

15(29.4)

 
 

Unemployed

11(21.6)

7(13.7)

8(15.7)

 

Complicationb

Foot disease

5(9.8)

7(13.7)

5(9.8)

0.77

 

Eye problem

13(25.5)

12(23.5)

11(21.6)

0.88

 

Kidney problem

0(0)

2(3.9)

0(3.9)

0.11

 

Neuropathy

1(2.0)

0(0)

3(5.9)

0.11

 

Arthritis

6 (11.8)

7(13.7)

5(9.8)

0.83

FHDb

Yes

28 (54.9)

22(43.1)

21(41.2)

0.32

No

23 (45.1)

29(56.9)

30(58.8)

 

Medicaltionb

Oral

45 (29.4)

37 (25.2)

44(28.8)

0.08

 

Insulin

9 (5.9)

6(3.9)

4(2.6)

0.32

 

Oral plus insulin

2 (1.3)

3 (2.0)

3 (2.0)

0.88

  1. a data presented as mean ± SD
  2. bData presented as proportion (n) and percentages%
  3. Statically significance at p<0.05; chi (x2) square test
  4. n for all the groups (NEP, NE and C) =51
  5. YLWD- years lived with diabetes
  6. FHD – family history of diabetes