Skip to main content

Table 1 Main peer- reviewed papers used as source for FODMAP values

From: Presence of Fermentable Oligo-, Di-, Monosaccharides, and Polyols (FODMAPs) in commonly eaten foods: extension of a database to indicate dietary FODMAP content and calculation of intake in the general population from food diary data

References

Analyzed food item/ product/ raw material

Analyzed value added in database

Food sampling/biological variation

Analytical method

[16] National Swedish Food Agency 2007–2013

One hundred and nineteen vegetables, cereal products and other food items

Fructose and lactose

Purchased in grocery chains, small food stores, and vegetable retailers and from casual trading area.

• If possible a minimum of ten samples of each food item

• Gas- chromatographic method [17].

• Result presented in fresh weight g/100 g food item

[9] Muir et al.2007

Sixty vegetables and 43 fruits

Free fructose and fructan

Approximately 500 g (edible weight) of each food item from respectively five grocery stores and five green grocers, Australia, Melbourne

• Analyses made of pooled samples

• Enzymatic analysis and spectrophotometry [18]

• Triplicate analysis

• Result presented in g/ 100 g “as eaten” in fresh weight

[10] Muir et al.2009

Forty-five vegetables and 41 fruits

Fructose, fructan

Approximately 500 g (edible weight) of each food item from each of five grocery stores and five green grocers, Australia, Melbourne

• Analyses made of pooled samples

•HPLC with ELSD

•Triplicate analysis

•Result presented in g/ 100 g “as eaten” in fresh weight

[8] Biesiekierski et al. 2011

Fifty- five grains and cereals

Fructose, FOS (nystose, kestose). Total fructan,

lactose, GOS (raffinose, stachyose) sugar polyols (sorbitol, mannitol)

Approximately 500 g (edible weight) of each food item from Supermarkets, market- places and health stores in Melbourne, Australia, One to 9 products/

brands of each food item, 500 g of each product edible weight

• Analyses made of pooled samples

• HPLC

• Total fructan via enzymatic analyses [19]

• Result presented in g/ 100 g “as eaten” in fresh weight.

[20] Whelan et al.2011

Nine categories of bread

Fructan

Five brands of each bread category and 500 g of each category of bread from Supermarkets was pooled together to 2500 g

• Analyses made of pooled samples

• Fructan via enzymatic and spectrophotometry method [18]

Triplicate bread samples were extracted and analyzed

in duplicates.

• Result presented as content g/100 g fresh weight (‘as

consumed’)

[13] Andersson et al.2009

Rye kernels and five kind of whole grain rye soft- and crispbread baked on one type of rye kernels

Fructan

Rye kernels 18 samples from an experimental field, Sweden

• Fructan via enzymatic and spectrophotometry method [18]

• Result presented in dry weight

• Duplicate analysis

[14] Haskå et al.

2008

Two cultivars of wheat grain and five milling fractions of the wheat

Fructan

Two cultivars, one sample conventionally and organically grown. One cultivar conventionally grown in Sweden

• Enzymatic [18]

• Duplicate analysis

• Result presented in dry weight

[21] Yao et al. 2014

Seventy-three food items

Sorbitol and mannitol

Five grocery stores, five green grocers, Australia Melbourne

• HPLC with ELSD

• Triplicate analyses

• Result presented in fresh weight

  1. HPLC High performance liquid chromatography, ELSD Evaporative light scattering detection