Table 1 Model Parameters Estimated through Calibration for all Subpopulations
From: Trends in adults’ energy imbalance gaps over two decades in Belgium using system dynamics modelling
BMI Effect | Time Effect | Interaction Effect | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\({\varvec{\beta }}_{1}\) | \({\varvec{\beta }}_{2}\) | \({\varvec{\beta }}_{3}\) | \({\varvec{\beta }}_{4}\) | \({\varvec{\beta }}_{5}\) | \({\varvec{\beta }}_{6}\) | \({\varvec{\beta }}_{7}\) | \({\varvec{\beta }}_{8}\) | ||
Belgium | Males | -0.363 | 0.079 | 0.306 | -1.00 | -0.014 | 0.024 | -0.009 | -0.004 |
Females | -0.192 | 0.044 | 0.174 | -0.068 | -0.062 | 0.158 | -0.101 | -0.017 | |
Flemish region | Males | 0.130 | 0.083 | -0.206 | 0.264 | 0.013 | -0.100 | 0.080 | 0.036 |
Females | -0.207 | 0.084 | 0.160 | -0.172 | -0.117 | 0.291 | -0.189 | -0.015 | |
Brussels | Males | -0.251 | 0.120 | 0.187 | -0.155 | -0.053 | 0.201 | -0.127 | -0.088 |
Females | -0.365 | 0.060 | 0.337 | -0.060 | -0.137 | 0.338 | -0.219 | -0.010 | |
Wallonia | Males | -0.355 | 0.121 | 0.266 | -0.172 | -0.018 | 0.055 | -0.037 | -0.008 |
Females | 0.137 | -0.014 | -0.117 | -0.063 | -0.009 | -0.025 | 0.031 | 0.005 | |