Table 1 Risk of bias assessment
From: Does human milk composition predict later risk of obesity? A systematic review
Included papers | Reporting | External Validity | Internal Validity—Bias | Internal Validity – Confounding | Power | Score | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brunner et al. 2015 [28] | 8 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 18 |
|
De Fluiter et al. 2021 [34] | 8 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 13 |
|
Ellsworth et al. 2020 [29] | 6 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
|
Gridneva et al. 2018 [30] | 7 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 14 |
|
Gridneva et al. 2018 [19] | 7 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 14 |
|
Gridneva et al. 2019 [31] | 7 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 14 |
|
Meyer et al. 2017 [32] | 8 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 18 |
|
Miralles et al. 2006 [33] | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
|
Olga et al. 2022 [35] | 8 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 13 |
|
Prentice et al. 2016 [18] | 7 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 17 |
|
- Results from risk of bias assessment using the modified Downs and Black checklist. Scores between 15 – 19 was considered fair (
), and scores ≤ 14 was considered low (
)
), and scores ≤ 14 was considered low (
)