Skip to main content
Help us understand how you use our websites. Take part in our 30 minute study now.

Potential impact of restricted caribou (Rangifer tarandus) consumption on anemia prevalence among Inuit adults in northern Canada



Caribou (Rangifer tarandus) is the top dietary source of iron and several micronutrients necessary for red blood cell production (erythropoiesis) in the contemporary diet of Inuit adults across Canada. Many caribou populations across the circumpolar north, however, have experienced dramatic declines in recent decades. Restricted access to caribou may negatively impact the nutrition and health of Inuit communities.


We used data from the Inuit Health Survey, a cross-sectional survey of 2550 Inuit adults in thirty-six communities across northern Canada (conducted in 2007–2008) to examine the relationship between caribou consumption, hemoglobin (Hb), and blood biomarkers of nutrient intake and contaminant exposure. Multivariable linear regression was used to investigate the potential public health impact of a theoretical restriction in caribou consumption, by estimating the response of Hb concentrations (and the attendant change in anemia prevalence), to theoretical changes in caribou consumption (with and without substitution of caribou with other country food meat).


Mean (95% CI) daily caribou meat consumption differed by an order of magnitude 4.3 (3.9–4.7), 51.1 (48.5-53.8), and 236.7 (224.7–248.7) grams/day between tertiles of caribou consumption. Mean (95% CI) hemoglobin levels increased from 129.1 (128.1–130.2) g/L to 132.5 (131.3–133.7) g/L between the highest and lowest tertiles of caribou consumption. In multivariable regression analyses, average daily caribou meat consumption was positively associated (P< 0.001) with hemoglobin levels. This relationship translated into approximately 4 g/L hemoglobin increase in participants in the third tertile of caribou consumption. The overall prevalence of anemia observed in the study population was 26.5% (24.5 – 28.3%) and a modelled restriction in caribou consumption (i.e. caribou = 0) increased the overall prevalence of anemia by approximately 6%. The maximum negative effect of caribou restrictions was related to a complete restriction on caribou consumption, coupled with the substitution of caribou with other country food meat (35.4% prevalence).


Given the importance of caribou to Inuit culture, health and wellbeing, and the high price of healthful market foods in remote northern communities, strategies to promote the sustainable harvest of country foods are urgently required to ensure the health and nutrition security of the Inuit, in the context of rapidly changing Arctic environments and ecosystems.

Peer Review reports


Anemia is a major international health issue affecting an estimated 1.62 billion people globally (95% CI: 1.50–1.74 billion), almost a quarter (24.8%) of the world’s total population [1]. Moreover, anemia is disproportionately represented in people of lower socioeconomic strata [2], and Indigenous Peoples in various global regions [3]. Among Inuit (Arctic Indigenous People) in northern Canada, the prevalence of anemia is several times higher than the average prevalence documented in many developed countries (approximately 8%) [4], and corresponds to a moderate (25–30% prevalence) to severe (40–43% prevalence) public health problem [5,6,7].

Approximately half of all cases of anemia on a global scale are assumed to be caused by dietary iron deficiency, related to inadequate iron intake, poor iron bioavailability, high iron needs, or high loss of iron [8]. However, the etiology of anemia is multifactorial and context-specific (e.g. population, region, and general environmental), with nutrient deficiencies, malaria, infections, inflammatory disorders, blood disorders, and low socioeconomic status, counted among its most frequent causes [8].

The declining consumption of country foods (i.e. wild foods harvested by Inuit using cultural knowledge, and traditional practices) may place Inuit at increased risk for both iron deficiency and anemia [9]. Country foods obtained from hunting, fishing, and trapping, remain fundamental to the Inuit food system, despite rapid sociocultural and economic changes in Inuit communities over the last several decades [10]. While Inuit harvest and consume a diversity of local species (including both plant, and animal species) for culture and subsistence, dietary studies show that caribou (Rangifer tarandus) generally represents the most frequently, and abundantly, consumed country food [11, 12]. Over 90 % of participants in the Inuit Health Survey reported consuming caribou over the previous year, with a mean annual consumption of 29.6–122.8 kg of caribou per person, according to sex, and region [12]. Caribou is also the number one source of iron (up to 36.5% of total population iron intake) and several micronutrients (including zinc, copper, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12) involved in erythropoiesis reported in contemporary Inuit diets [11, 13].

Many caribou populations across the circumpolar north, however, have experienced dramatic declines (70–97%) in recent decades [14,15,16,17], prompting restrictions on Inuit subsistence harvest in several regions of the Canadian north [11]. While Inuit have long adapted to fluctuating cycles of species abundance and migration patterns, the declining use of country foods – which may be related to, or exacerbated by, species declines – may place communities at increased risk of food insecurity and public health issues. Barriers to country food harvest and consumption, whether through species decline (i.e. availability), harvest regulations (i.e. accessibility), and/or other sociocultural, economic and environmental factors that restrict availability and access, are of concern to human health, including (but not limited to) food security and the decline of critical nutrients in the diet. Although many nutrients (e.g. protein) may be provisioned from consumption of alternate country food species [18,19,20] and/or healthful market foods, certain micronutrients may be limitedly available and/or “unaffordable” in the northern food supply [21]. For instance, when caribou is substituted for other country food species (e.g. muskox (Ovibos moschatus)), intake of zinc, and in some cases iron and vitamin D, is markedly reduced [19]. Furthermore, the high price of animal-source foods in remote northern community stores, may favour the substitution of caribou with lower-cost high-energy density but low nutrient-density foods such as starches and simple carbohydrates [21].

The human health impacts of wildlife declines and harvest restrictions among Arctic Indigenous Peoples are unknown. The goal of this research is to examine the potential human health impact of restricted caribou consumption for Inuit adults in northern Canada. As caribou is a major source of nutrients important in the prevention of anemia, the specific objectives of this research are to: (i) examine the relationship between caribou consumption, hemoglobin (Hb), and blood biomarkers of nutrient status and contaminant exposure; and (ii) examine the theoretical public health impact of restricted caribou consumption, by modelling the response of Hb to caribou intake using multivariable regression. We hypothesize that caribou consumption is positively associated with blood Hb concentrations; thus, restricting caribou intake will lead to an increased prevalence of anemia in the study population.


Survey design, study setting, and participants

Dietary data and blood biomarkers were derived from the 2007–8 International Polar Year (IPY) Inuit Health survey (IHS), a cross sectional health survey of Inuit adults (men and non-pregnant women) residing across three regions of northern Canada (Nunatsiavut, Nunavut, and the ISR; Fig. 1). Detailed methodology for the IHS, including the participatory survey design, has been reported elsewhere [22]. The survey took place between the late summer and fall of 2007 and 2008 in thirty-six communities (latitude of 54°10′N to 76°25′N) spanning the three Inuit regions. Households (n = 2796) in each community were selected to participate through a stratified random sampling design and, ultimately, 68% (1901) agreed to participate. All non-pregnant Inuit adults (18 years and older) from the households were eligible to participate in the survey. A total of 2595 self-identified Inuit adults agreed to participate in the IHS, among whom 2169 completed the individual questionnaire and provided blood samples (overall response rate = 83.6%). The sample size was consistent with the 2000 individuals needed to provide statistical power, meet international sample size requirement, and be representative of the total estimated adult population (17,726) in the 3 survey regions at the time of the survey [22]. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Ethical approval for the IHS was granted by McGill University (Faculty of Medicine Institutional Review Board) and scientific Research Licenses were obtained, where necessary, from northern research institutions (the Aurora Research Institute (Northwest Territories) and (Qaujisaqtulirijikkut (NU)). The University of Ottawa (Health Sciences and Science Research Ethics Board, file number H05–15-16), granted ethics approval for secondary analysis of the data.

Fig. 1

Map of the participating Inuit regions of the 2007–8 Inuit Health Survey. Nunavut is comprised of the Kitikmeot, Kivalliq and Qikiqtaaluk regions

Dietary assessment

Dietary assessments were conducted in-person, by trained interviewers, in English and Inuit Languages. A semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was administered to estimate the frequency (number of times per day, week, and month) and usual serving size of each country food item (species, and in some cases, distinct parts such as organs and fat) consumed during the previous year, both in and out of harvest season. The FFQ was developed with input from the IHS steering-committees, based on a revised version of the Centre for Indigenous People’s Nutrition and Environment’s Inuit traditional FFQ. Average (annual average) daily consumption (grams per day, g/d) was calculated for each participant as the product of daily intake frequency and serving size, adjusted for seasonality, according to wildlife harvest calendars. Consumption results were truncated at the 90th percentile to correct for unrealistic reporting. Average daily caribou meat consumption (g/d) was calculated for each participant as the sum of caribou (raw) meat, and caribou dry meat.

Caribou dry meat was converted to fresh weight by correcting for the moisture content differential between raw and dried caribou meat (0.73 and 0.27%, respectively [23]). Total meat from all other country food species, including meat from both terrestrial mammals (e.g. muskox meat) and marine mammals (e.g. ringed seal meat), was summed as “total other country food meat” and included as a model covariate.

Biochemical assessment

As described in greater detail elsewhere [6, 24, 25], blood biomarkers of nutrient status and contaminant exposure were quantified from fasting (8–16 h preceding the interview) venous blood samples. Blood samples were collected by certified nurses in vacutainer tubes with clot activator and polymer gel for serum separation (Becton Dickinson), or EDTA-coated vacutainers for whole blood hematology. Hb from venous blood samples (morning participants) and blood drops from a finger prick (afternoon participants) was determined using the azide methemoglobin method with a HemoCue 201+ portable photometer (HemoCue; Lake Forest, California). Serum ferritin (SF) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were quantified by automated chemiluminescence assay (Liaison Ferritin; Diasorin, Italy) and by auto-analyzer (Beckman Coulter; Brea, California), respectively [6]. Soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) levels were determined by ELISA (R&D Systems; Minneapolis, Minnesota) for a subsample of the population (n = 1039). Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) seropositivity was ascertained from detection of serum IgG antibodies against H. pylori by Immunoenzymatic methods (Calbiotech) at the Montreal General Hospital. Serum 25(OH)D was quantified using the LIAISON total 25(OH)D assay (DiaSorin) at McGill University (detection limit of 0.5 mg/L) as described elsewhere [26]. Fatty acid composition was measured from 200 mL of red blood cells (RBC) stored in 200 mL of a 1:1 solution of methanol and distilled water plus 8.4 mg BHT (Becton Dickinson) based on RBC membranes by Lipid Analytical Laboratories (University of Guelph Research Park). RBC phospholipid FA analyses were expressed as a percentage of total FAs weight. Selenium, mercury, cadmium and lead were quantified in whole blood by an inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometer (Elan DRC II (Perkin-Elmer SCIEX) for selenium, mercury and cadmium; ELAN 6000 (Perkin-Elmer SCIEX) for Pb) at the Laboratoire de Toxicologie, Institut national de santé publique, (Québec, QC) [25, 27].

Anemia classification

Anemia was classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) [2] Hb cutoff values of 130 g/L for men and 120 g/L for non-pregnant women. Cutoff values were adjusted downward (− 0.3 g/L) for current cigarette smokers [2].


Model covariates are summarized in Table 1, including demographic (age, sex, region) and socioeconomic characteristics (e.g. education (post-secondary education), income (> CAD $ 40,000), smoking (current smoker), as well as other factors known or suspected to be involved in the development of anemia among Inuit adults (e.g. consumption of country food meat (non-caribou)), food insecurity and H. pylori seropositivity [24]. Food security status was assed using a modified version of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Security Survey Module) [28]; food insecurity was classified based on two or more affirmative responses on the 10-item adult scale as recommended by Health Canada [29].

Table 1 Demographic, lifestyle, and socioeconomic characteristics according to tertiles of caribou consumption: IPY 2007–2008 Inuit Health Survey
Table 2 Average daily consumption of country food1, by tertile of caribou consumption (average daily intake - g/day) (n = 2175)

Statistical analysis

Demographic characteristics, country food consumption, and blood biomarkers were described using descriptive statistics (mean (95% CI)). Participants were stratified into tertiles based on average daily caribou consumption (g/day) and multiple comparisons, (with Bonferroni correction) were used to compare means between tertiles. Multivariable linear regression [30] was used to test the hypothesis that caribou consumption was positively associated with blood Hb concentrations. Model covariates (Table 1) were selected a priori based on known, or suspected relationships to Hb in the Inuit population. When necessary, model parameters were logarithmically (ln) transformed to improve normality of the respective distributions. Significance was set at α = 5% for all statistical tests. All statistical analyses were performed with Stata SE® (version 14; StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas).

We investigated the potential human health impact of a theoretical restriction in caribou consumption, by estimating the response of Hb levels to changes in caribou consumption using the multivariable model described above [31]. The population change in anemia prevalence was estimated by subtracting the expected impact of restricted caribou consumptions from baseline Hb concentrations observed in study population. Four scenarios were formulated to evaluate the impact of different levels of restricted caribou consumption and possible adaptation options. Scenario 1 represented a complete restriction on caribou consumption (i.e. caribou intake = 0). Scenario 2 represented a complete restriction on caribou consumption, and substituted caribou meat with the equivalent weight of other country food meat. Finally, scenarios 3 and 4 represented a fifty-percent reduction in caribou consumption, considering both no substitution of caribou meat (scenario 3), and replacing caribou with intake of other country food meat (scenario 4).


Participant characteristics

Participant characteristics are presented according to tertiles of caribou consumption in Table 1. Overall, the mean ± SD age of study participants was 42 ± 15 years. The percentage of participants who reported to be current smokers was 70%. The proportion of women decreased from 67 to 56% between tertiles one and three. Likewise, the percentage of physically inactive participants decreased between tertiles one and three (39 to 28%). Participants in higher tertiles of caribou consumption were more likely to report incomes above CAD $40, 000, and H. pylori seropositivity. A higher percentage of participants from the Kivalliq and Kitikmeot regions were in the highest tertile of caribou consumption. By contrast, fewer participants from Nunatsiavut, the Qikiqtaaluk region, and the Inuvialuit Settlement Region were represented in the highest tertile of caribou consumption (Table 2).

Blood biomarkers

Most concentrations of blood nutrients and contaminants remained stable between tertiles (Table 3). Mean (95% CI) concentrations of % eicosapentonoic acid (EPA), magnesium, selenium, and mercury were lower in the third tertile, relative to tertile 1. Mean (95% CI) Hb levels were higher in tertiles two 132.5 (131.3–133.7) g/L, and three 132.9 (131.8–134.1), relative to tertile one 129.1 (128.1-130.2) (Table 4). Similarly, mean (95% CI) serum ferritin concentrations were higher in tertiles two 58.5 (54.1–63.0) g/L, and three 57.5 (53.1–61.9) g/L, relative to tertile one 50.1 (46.3–53.9) g/L (Table 4).

Table 3 Blood biomarkers of contaminants and nutrients by tertile of caribou consumption: IPY 2007–2008 Inuit Health Survey (n = 2175)
Table 4 Blood biomarkers of anemia and iron status by tertile of caribou consumption (n = 2175)

Modelled change in hemoglobin and anemia

In multivariable regression, Hb was positively associated (P < 0.001) with caribou consumption after adjustment for covariates (Table 1), with 0.008 g/L Hb increase per daily gram of caribou consumed (Table 5). This translated into approximately 4 g/L Hb increase in participants in the third tertile of caribou consumption (i.e. who reported consuming ~ 500 g/day of caribou, on a wet weight basis). The consumption of other (i.e. non-caribou) country food meat was negatively associated (< 0.001) with Hb (Table 5). Hb decreased by 0.007 g/L per daily gram consumption of other country food meat, which translated into about 0.5 g/L of Hb decrease in participants of the higher tertile of caribou consumption (approximately 80 g).

Table 5 Multivariable linear regression1 coefficients for hemoglobin, with both dietary and non-dietary determinants as independent variables2. Inuit adults: International Polar Year Inuit Health Survey, 2007–2008

The overall prevalence of anemia in the study population was 26.5% (24.5 – 28.3%) (Fig. 2). The impact of various scenarios of restricted caribou consumption are presented in Fig. 2, based on the observed relationship between Hb and consumption of caribou meat, and other country food meat with (Table 5). A complete restriction on caribou consumption (i.e. restricting caribou to zero in the models) was associated with an overall 31.9% prevalence of anemia in the study population (18.4% in ISR to 35.2% in Nunavut). A complete restriction on caribou consumption, coupled with the substitution of caribou meat with other country food meat, represented the maximum negative effect of caribou restrictions on the population distribution of Hb levels (Fig. 2). This scenario leads to an overall increase in anemia prevalence of approximately 9% (35.4% prevalence) and was higher among females (37.5% prevalence), participants in the highest tertile of caribou consumption (46.6%), and participants with annual incomes below CAD $40,000 (36.9%) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2

Modelled change in prevalence of anemia among Inuit adults in Canada (by region) from different scenarios of theoretical caribou consumption restrictions. Description of model scenarios: Baseline: Observed prevalence of anemia in Inuit adults who participated in the 2007–8 Inuit Health Survey, according to WHO cutoff values for hemoglobin, adjusted for smoking. Scenario 1: Complete restriction on caribou consumption (caribou = 0). Scenario 2: Complete restriction on caribou consumption (caribou = 0) and substitution of caribou with other country food meat. Scenario 3: Fifty-percent restriction in caribou consumption. Scenario 4: Fifty-percent restriction in caribou consumption and substitution of caribou with other country food meat

Fig. 3

Modelled change in prevalence of anemia according to dietary and socioeconomic factors, from a theoretical restriction of caribou consumption, and the substitution of caribou with other country food meat. Food insecure combines both moderate and severe food insecurity


Inuit have witnessed climate-related changes on various aspects of their traditional food systems, including changes in the accessibility, availability, and condition, of key country food species [18, 32]. In light of emerging livelihood and public health concerns related to caribou declines across northern Canada [33, 34], we have modelled the role of caribou consumption in the maintenance of nutritional adequacy (anemia) for Inuit adults in northern Canada. Previous studies among Inuit adults have reported a positive association between country food consumption, serum ferritin [24], and Hb [6]. The positive association between average daily (annual average) caribou consumption (g/day), serum ferritin, and Hb suggests that barriers to consuming caribou (whether through species decline, associated harvest regulations, and/or other socioeconomic factors that limit subsistence harvests) may represent a concern for public health, including nutrient deficiencies (such as zinc deficiency, associated with diseases such as diabetes and immunological effects [35]) and anemia. While caribou may be substituted for other country food species (e.g. moose or geese), micronutrient levels in the alternate diet may be diminished and result in deficiencies in some individuals [18, 19]. It is important to note, however, that no empirical research has examined changes in nutrition, food security, or public health status, in relation to caribou (or other wildlife) declines and/or related wildlife conservation measures (e.g. harvest quotas) in the Arctic [11]. Given the already high prevalence (up to 68.8%) of food insecurity (i.e. the state of inadequate access to sufficient, safe/nutritious and culturally preferred foods, including country foods) among Inuit in Northern Canada [36], and its adverse association with dietary quality (e.g. higher intake of carbohydrates, and lower intakes of key nutrients such as vitamins C and D, calcium, magnesium, iron, fibre and folate) and blood biomarkers of nutritional status (e.g. lower hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels) documented among Inuit [37], wildlife declines, harvest restrictions, and other factors limiting country food access for Inuit need to be approached (i.e. monitored and responded to, through by appropriate policies and interventions) from a public health perspective.

Although country foods remain vital to the health and wellness of Arctic Indigenous Peoples [10], the public health implications of species declines and harvest restrictions in the Canadian north have not been well studied. While hunting pressures by humans can exacerbate caribou declines, they are not generally recognized as the ultimate cause of population declines [16, 33]. Yet, the health consequences of these declines would be experienced directly by Inuit and other northern Indigenous Peoples who rely on caribou for food security and nutritional adequacy. In Madagascar, wildlife consumption (“bush meat”) contributed approximately 0.7 g/dL to Hb levels in children, and a modelled restriction in bush meat access resulted in an estimated 29% increase in the number of cases of childhood anemia [31]. Nevertheless, even at the international scale, studies on the impact of wildlife depletion and harvest restrictions on food security and human health are limited.

It is important to note that the etiology of anemia among Inuit is not fully understood [5], and recent evidence recognizes non-dietary/nutritional factors (e.g. poverty, household crowding, food insecurity, lead exposure, H. pylori infection, inflammation, chronic blood loss, and impaired iron absorption and/or utilization) [6, 38]. There is also concern that exposure to heavy metals (e.g. lead and mercury) from consumption of country foods may expose individuals to unsafe levels of environmental contaminants and represent concern for anemia (e.g. lead interference with heme biosynthesis). Lead exposure among Inuit has been investigated as a potential cause of anemia and has been found to be negatively associated with Hb in men [6]. In this study, most concentrations of blood nutrients and contaminants remained stable between tertiles of caribou consumption. However, we observed that mean concentrations of %EPA, magnesium, selenium, and mercury were lower in the highest tertile of caribou consumption relative to the lowest tertile. It is noteworthy that although country foods are rich sources of heme iron [23], consumption of total other country food meat (i.e. non-caribou country food meat) was negatively associated with Hb in this study. Frequency of marine mammal consumption has been documented as an independent negative predictor of Hb concentrations in the Inuit population of Canada [6]. It is postulated that high red blood cell EPA status, corresponding to higher intake of marine mammals [39], may contribute to anemia in this population [6]. Higher intakes of n-3 fatty acids may alter platelet function and/or hemostasis and lead to increased gastrointestinal blood loss [40]. Thus, high intakes of caribou may reflect lower intakes of marine mammals, contributing to improved iron status and Hb concentrations.

Women of childbearing age, as well as pregnant and lactating women, who are at increased risk of iron deficiency and inadequacies of magnesium and zinc [41, 42] may be at increased risk of adverse health outcomes from restrictions on caribou harvests. This has significant implications for health and social equity, as maternal health and disadvantage have important consequences for intergenerational equity, including child growth and development [43]. In low- and middle-income countries, for example, maternal anemia status is one of the most significant predictors of anemia in children [44]. Although a low prevalence of iron-deficiency anemia has been documented among Inuit children in Nunavut [38], iron depletion was highly prevalent (33%) among Inuit children in Nunavik, where food insecure children also had a greater burden of nutritional deficiencies and slower linear growth [45]. As described above, the human health effects of wildlife depletion have not been well studied, accordingly the public health risks are largely unknown. Public health interventions for the treatment and prevention of iron deficiency anemia generally include iron supplementation and fortification. Nutrient supplementation strategies such as “Sprinkles” [46], for instance, have been included in strategies to prevent anemia in Indigenous children of northern Canada [47, 48]. While anemia among premenopausal Inuit women is largely attributed to low iron /depleted iron stores [6, 7], the vast majority of anemia cases among Inuit men and post-menopausal women are unexplained by iron status [6]. The clinical significance of anemia among Inuit has not, to our knowledge, been established or described in the literature, and requires further study and monitoring – particularly in light of biodiversity declines.


Several important study limitations warrant mention. First, this study is based on cross sectional data which precludes the direct inference of causality. Thus, the relationship between caribou consumption and hemoglobin levels observed in this study warrants further examination through dedicated case studies, that include both epidemiological designs, but also participatory community-engaged methods to capture the many wellbeing and psychosocial impacts of caribou declines on public health. Second, caribou consumption estimated from the FFQ reflects the average diet during the twelve months preceding the interview, while blood biomarkers reflect a single time point (in the late summer/fall). Accordingly, the relationship observed between caribou consumption and blood biomarkers may differ throughout the year. Third, data from the Inuit Health Survey is aggregated at the regional level, which precluded the possibility of linking human health measures to the status of northern caribou populations. Data for all regions was thus combined and modelled at the population level; however, this may have obscured region, age, and sex risk factors [6]. Nevertheless, this is the first study, to our knowledge, that has attempted to establish empirical links between country food consumption and human health status in the Arctic.


The prevalence of anemia is high in the Inuit adult population of Canada and restricted access to caribou has the potential to further exacerbate this issue. Inuit communities and organizations, conservation scientists, and public health practitioners must work together to implement integrated solutions that ensure the sustainability of caribou populations over the long term, while sustaining food security and public health in the interim. Preventing anemia will also necessitate support to address systemic inequalities (e.g. education, food insecurity and infection) among Inuit [6].



Body mass index


Country food


Docosahexaenoic acid


Eicosapentonoic acid




High sensitivity


Inuit Health Survey


Red blood cell


  1. 1.

    McLean E, Cogswell M, Egli I, Wojdyla D. Worldwide prevalence of anaemia, WHO vitamin and mineral nutrition information system, 1993–2005. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12:444–54.

  2. 2.

    WHO. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity. 2011 [Internet]. Geneva; 2015. Available from:

  3. 3.

    Khambalia AZ, Aimone AM, Zlotkin SH. Burden of anemia among indigenous populations. Nutr Rev. 2011;69:693–719.

  4. 4.

    DeMaeyer EM, Adiels-Tegman M. The prevalence of anaemia in the world. La prevalence de l'anémie dans le monde. World Health Stat Q. Rapport trimestriel de statistiques sanitaires mondiales. 1985;38:302–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jamieson JA, Kuhnlein HV. The paradox of anemia with high meat intake: a review of the multifactorial etiology of anemia in the Inuit of North America. Nutr Rev. 2008;66:256–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Jamieson JA, Weiler HA, Kuhnlein HV, Egeland GM. Prevalence of unexplained anaemia in Inuit men and Inuit post-menopausal women in northern Labrador: international polar year Inuit health survey. Can J Public Health. 2016;107:e81–7.

  7. 7.

    Plante CL, Blanchet C, Rochette L, O Brien HT. Prevalence of anemia among Inuit women in Nunavik, Canada. IJCH. 2011;70:154–65.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Petry N, Olofin I, Hurrell R, Boy E, Wirth J, Moursi M, et al. The Proportion of Anemia Associated with Iron Deficiency in Low, Medium, and High Human Development Index Countries: A Systematic Analysis of National Surveys. Nutrients.2016;8:693.

  9. 9.

    Jamieson JA, Kuhnlein HV, Weiler HA, Egeland GM. Higher n3-fatty acid status is associated with lower risk of iron depletion among food insecure Canadian Inuit women. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:289.

  10. 10.

    Kuhnlein HV, Receveur O. Local cultural animal food contributes high levels of nutrients for Arctic Canadian indigenous adults and children. J Nutr. 2007;137:1110–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kenny TA, Fillion M, Simpkin S, Wesche SD, Chan HM. Caribou (Rangifer tarandus) and Inuit nutrition security in Canada. EcoHealth. 2018;15:590–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kenny TA, Chan HM. Estimating wildlife harvest based on reported consumption by Inuit in the Canadian Arctic. Arctic. 2017;70(1):12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kenny TA, Hu XF, Kuhnlein HV, Wesche SD, Chan HM. Dietary sources of energy and nutrients in the contemporary diet of Inuit adults: results from the 2007–08 Inuit health survey. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21:1319–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Russell DE, Gunn A. Migratory tundra Rangifer. In: Jeffries MO, Richter-Menge JA, Overland JE, editors. Arctic report card; 2013. p. 1–136.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Russell DE, Gunn A, White RG. CircumArctic collaboration to monitor Caribou and wild reindeer. Arctic. 2015;68:6–10.

  16. 16.

    Gunn A, Russell DE, Eamer J. Northern caribou population trends in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Canadian biodiversity: ecosystem status and trends 2010. Technical thematic report no. 10. In: Canadian councils of resource ministers; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Vors LS, Boyce MS. Global declines of caribou and reindeer. Glob Chang Biol. 2009;15:2626–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wesche SD, Chan HM. Adapting to the impacts of climate change on food security among Inuit in the Western Canadian Arctic. EcoHealth. 2010;7:361–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rosol R, Powell-Hellyer S, Chan HM. Impacts of decline harvest of country food on nutrient intake among Inuit in Arctic Canada: impact of climate change and possible adaptation plan. IJCH. 2016;75:417–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Nancarrow TL, Chan HM. Observations of environmental changes and potential dietary impacts in two communities in Nunavut, Canada. Rural Remote Health. 2010;10:1370.

  21. 21.

    Kenny TA, Fillion M, MacLean J, Wesche SD, Chan HM. Calories are cheap, nutrients are expensive – the challenge of healthy living in Arctic communities. Food Policy. 2018;80:39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Saudny H, Leggee D, Egeland GM. Design and methods of the adult Inuit health survey 2007–2008. IJCH. 2012;71:19752.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Health Canada. Canadian Nutrient File (CNF), 2015 [Internet]. Ottawa, Ontario: Food Directorate, Nutrition Research Division; 2015. Available from:

  24. 24.

    Jamieson JA, Weiler HA, Kuhnlein HV, Egeland GM. Traditional food intake is correlated with Iron Stores in Canadian Inuit men. J Nutr. 2012;142:764–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Laird BD, Goncharov AB, Egeland GM, Man Chan H. Dietary advice on Inuit traditional food use needs to balance benefits and risks of mercury, selenium, and n3 fatty acids. J Nutr. 2013;143:923–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hayek El J, Egeland GM, Weiler HA. Older age and lower adiposity predict better 25-hydroxy vitamin D concentration in Inuit adults: International Polar Year Inuit Health Survey, 2007–2008. Arch Osteoporos. 2011;6:167–177.

  27. 27.

    Laird BD, Goncharov AB, Goncharov AB, Chan HM. Body burden of metals and persistent organic pollutants among Inuit in the Canadian Arctic. Environ Int. 2013;59:33–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Health Canada, Food Branch OONP, Promotion. Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) - Health and Nutrition Surveys - Health Canada. 2012. Available from:

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Health Canada, Food Branch OONP, Promotion. Determining Food Security Status - Food and Nutrition Surveillance - Health Canada. 2012. Available from:

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hidalgo B, Goodman M. Multivariate or multivariable regression? Am J Public Health. 2013;103:39–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Golden C, Fernald L, Brashares JS, Rasolofoniaina BR, Kremen C. Benefits of wildlife consumption to child nutrition in a biodiversity hotspot. PNAS. 2011;108:19653–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Nancarrow TL, Chan HM, Ing A, Kuhnlein HV. Climate change impacts on dietary nutrient status of Inuit in Nunavut, Canada. FASEB J. 2008;22:Supplement1096–7.

  33. 33.

    Parlee BL, Sandlos J, Natcher DC. Undermining subsistence: barren-ground caribou in a “tragedy of open access.”. Sci Adv. 2018;4:e1701611.

  34. 34.

    Parlee BL, Wray K. Gender and the social dimensions of changing caribou populations in the Western Arctic. Living on the Land: Indigenous Women’s Understanding of Place. 2016:169–90.

  35. 35.

    Prasad AS. Clinical Spectrum of human zinc deficiency. In: Biochemistry of zinc. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1993. p. 219–58.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Rosol R, Huet C, Wood M, Lennie C, Osborne G, Egeland GM. Prevalence of affirmative responses to questions of food insecurity: international polar year Inuit health survey, 2007-2008. IJCH. 2011;70:488–97.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Egeland GM, Johnson-Down L, Cao ZR, Sheikh N, Weiler HA. Food insecurity and nutrition transition combine to affect nutrient intakes in Canadian arctic communities. J Nutr. 2011;141:1746–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Pacey A, Weiler HA, Egeland GM. Low prevalence of iron-deficiency anaemia among Inuit preschool children: Nunavut Inuit child health survey, 2007–2008. Public Health Nutr. Cambridge University Press. 2011;14:1415–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lucas M, Proust F, Blanchet C, Ferland A, Déry S, Abdous B, et al. Is marine mammal fat or fish intake most strongly associated with omega-3 blood levels among the Nunavik Inuit? Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fat Acids. 2010;83:143–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Petersen KM, Parkinson AJ, Nobmann ED, Bulkow L, Yip R, Mokdad A. Iron deficiency anemia among Alaska natives may be due to fecal loss rather than inadequate intake. J Nutri. 1996;126:2774–2783.

  41. 41.

    Duhaime G, Chabot M, Gaudreault M. Food consumption patterns and socioeconomic factors among the inuit of Nunavik. Ecol Food Nutr. 2002;41:91–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Berti PR, Soueida R. Dietary assessment of indigenous Canadian Arctic women with a focus on pregnancy and lactation. IJCH. 2008;67:2304–11.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Aizer A, Currie J. The intergenerational transmission of inequality: maternal disadvantage and health at birth. Science. 2014;344:856–861.

  44. 44.

    Balarajan Y, Ramakrishnan U, Özaltin E, Shankar A, Subramanian S. Anaemia in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2012;78:2123–35.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Pirkle CM, Lucas M, Dallaire R, Ayotte P, Jacobson JL, Jacobson SW, et al. Food insecurity and nutritional biomarkers in relation to stature in Inuit children from Nunavik. Can J Public Health. 2014;105:233–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Zlotkin SH, Schauer C, Christofides A, Sharieff W, Tondeur MC, Hyder SMZ. Micronutrient sprinkles to control childhood Anaemia. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Christofides A, Schauer C, Sharieff W. Acceptability of micronutrient sprinkles: a new food-based approach for delivering iron to first nations and Inuit children in northern Canada. Chronic dis can. 2005:26:114–20.

  48. 48.

    Christofides A, Schauer C, Zlotkin SH. Iron deficiency and anemia prevalence and associated etiologic risk factors in first nations and Inuit communities in northern Ontario and Nunavut. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2005;96:304–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors wish to recognize and extend their appreciation to all participating community members, community and health organizations, nurses, technicians, Drs. Grace Egeland, Kue Young, Hope Weiler and the Steering Committees, of the Canadian IPY IHS. We gratefully acknowledge the National Inuit Health Survey Working Group for reviewing this manuscript and providing invaluable feedback.


The Inuit Health Survey was realized with funding (design of the study and data collection) from The Government of Canada Federal Program for International Polar Year, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Health Canada, the Northern Contaminant Program of the Government of Canada, ArcticNet, Canada Research Chair Program, and the Canadian Foundation for Innovation. Funding for the analysis and interpretation of data, as well as the writing of this manuscript was provided by the Canada Research Chair Program and the Nasivvik Centre for Inuit Health and Changing Environments.

Availability of data and materials

The data are not publicly available due to research participant privacy/consent and data ownership agreements with the participating communities. Any request of the raw data will be reviewed by the National Inuit Health Survey Working Group that represents the interests of the participating stakeholders.

Author information




TK conceived of the research question (based on research priorities expressed by communities included in this study), performed the statistical analyses, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. XH, assisted with the analysis and interpretation of the data and provided feedback on the drafted manuscript. HMC and SDW provided feedback on the drafted manuscript. JAJ, HMC and HVK were involved in the design, data collection, and/or analysis of data from the 2007–2008 Inuit Health Survey. They all, along with SDW, provided feedback on the analysis and interpretation of the data, as well as the drafted manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hing Man Chan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for the IHS was granted by McGill University (Faculty of Medicine Institutional Review Board). All participants of the IHS provided informed consent. The University of Ottawa (Health Sciences and Science Research Ethics Board, file number H05–15-16) granted ethical clearance for secondary analysis of data. Scientific Research Licenses for the IHS were obtained from northern research granting institutions (Qaujisaqtulirijikkut (Nunavut), and the Aurora Research Institute (Northwest Territories)).

Consent for publication

No individual data is presented.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kenny, T., Hu, X.F., Jamieson, J.A. et al. Potential impact of restricted caribou (Rangifer tarandus) consumption on anemia prevalence among Inuit adults in northern Canada. BMC Nutr 5, 30 (2019).

Download citation


  • Inuit
  • Indigenous
  • Anemia
  • Hemoglobin
  • Animal source food
  • Traditional food
  • Country food
  • Nutrition security
  • Food security