Skip to main content
Download PDF

Optimal complementary feeding practices among caregivers and their children aged 6–23 months in Kisoro district, Uganda

BMC Nutrition volume 8, Article number: 81 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

There are many risk factors for stunting, and studies most often corroborate complementary feeding practices as a significant risk factor. Information on the prevalence of optimal complementary feeding practices and factors that lend to caregivers meeting their requirements in Kisoro district, a district with high stunting rates, is mostly lacking.

Methodology

An analytical cross-sectional study that used secondary data from a USAID-funded project. Entries for 384 caregivers of children aged 6–23 months in Kisoro district were abstracted from the project database. The data was analysed using SPSS version 20. The association between independent factors and optimal complementary feeding practices was determined using multivariable logistic regressions at the three levels of the Socio-Ecological Model.

Findings

Although 95% of the infants were introduced to semi-solid foods promptly, their diet was nutritionally inadequate as evidenced by the low minimum dietary diversity of 4.43%. Some of the key covariates associated with these outcomes included, the type of occupation (AOR = 21.21; CI = 2.03—221.26; p = 0.011), community groups (AOR = 0. 43; CI = 0.22—0.83; p = 0.012), not being married (AOR = 13.25; CI = 1.76—100.25; p = 0.012), age of the child (AOR = 2.21; CI = 1.1—4.45; p = 0.026); among others.

Conclusion

The prevalence of MAD and MDD was very low in Kisoro district, even compared to national figures, putting these children at a very high risk of stunting. Increased advocacy is needed to support the community-level implementation of the IYCF guidelines.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Stunting, a sub-form of malnutrition responsible for 14% of global childhood deaths, also heavily debilitates cognitive growth and physical capabilities, leaving a person's future less gainful than it would otherwise have been [1, 2]. There are many risk factors for stunting, and studies most often corroborate complementary feeding practices as a significant risk factor [2, 3]. Unfortunately, in many countries across the world, few children receive nutritionally adequate and safe complementary foods. Less than a quarter of the world’s population of infants aged 6–23 months meet the Minimum Acceptable Diet (MAD) criteria appropriate for their age [4]. These reports of inappropriate and inadequate complementary feeding practices may be responsible for the world's 21.9% of stunted children [5].

Several studies have reported on the inadequacy of Infant and Young Child Feeding (IYCF) practices and, consequently, complementary feeding practices. These studies advocate for the need to support populations, especially in low- and middle-income countries such as Uganda, to adopt the recommended evidence-based guidelines when practising complementary feeding [1, 5,6,7,8,9]. These studies have revealed that proportions of children meeting requirements for optimal complementary feeding were generally low with minimum acceptable diet (MAD), minimum dietary diversity (MDD) and minimum meal frequency (MMF) in order of lowest to slightly higher across all the regions. However, other indicators such as continued breastfeeding (CBF) at one year and introduction of solid, semi-solid or soft foods (ISSSFs) showed higher proportions for children aged 6–23 months [5, 10,11,12].

In Uganda, the percentages of children between 6 – 23 months of age that got a MAD, received meals the minimum number of times and had an adequately diverse diet were low at 15%, 42% and 30%, respectively [10]. Limited data exists at the district level in Uganda, although literature revealed the prevalence of MDD in Kisoro district at 3.9% [13]. Studies have documented various factors associated with complementary feeding practices, such as the caregiver's occupation type [14,15,16,17], household size [18,19,20,21], age of the caregiver [14, 15, 22, 23] and several others. This study concentrated on factors according to the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) at three levels; settings, interpersonal and intrapersonal levels.

However, to our knowledge, none of the studies have determined the prevalence of more than three complementary feeding practices and the factors that lend to caregivers meeting the requirements for the optimal complementary feeding practices in Kisoro district. Cognizant of this empirical gap, this study sought to determine the prevalence and factors associated with the optimal complementary feeding practices (OCFPs) of caregivers and their children aged 6–23 months in Kisoro district. The findings from this study will provide evidence for use by policymakers and organisations towards strengthening existing strategies tackling the malnutrition scourge, at least in the Kigezi region.

Methods

Study design, area, and population

The study adopted a cross-sectional analytical design and employed quantitative data collection and analysis methods. The secondary data used was initially collected in Kisoro district, by the USAID-funded project Uganda's Integrated Community, Agriculture, and Nutrition (ICAN) Activity, from households with children aged 6–23 months; the primary respondents were the caregivers of the children. The researchers purposively selected Kisoro district because it is one of the districts in the Kigezi region, a region that has persisted with levels of stunting higher than the national levels [24]. Kisoro district is located in the South-Western part of Uganda, bordered in the North by Kanungu district, Kabale district to the East, the Republic of Rwanda to the South and the Democratic Republic of Congo to the West. The district has a total land area of roughly 729.2 km2 (662 km2 of open land, and the rest is open water and swamps). The district is approximately 510 km from Kampala, the capital city of Uganda [24, 25].

Sample size and sampling procedure

The study used Cochran's popular formula for sample size determination [26]. The inputs were 95% confidence level and 5% margin of error, and because of the unknown proportion of children aged 6–23 months, we used maximum variability of 50%, i.e., 0.5. The sample size calculated was 384.

Multi-stage sampling was applied to select the entries for analysis from the database obtained from the USAID/ICAN project. First, the researcher chose 12 parishes from the 22 where USAID/ICAN carried out its activities using random sampling and then randomly selected 24 villages from the 12 parishes. Finally, systematic sampling was applied, which involved picking 16 households from each village by choosing the 4th household till 384 were obtained. Ultimately, 16 households from the 24 villages made up the 384 per the calculated sample size.

Data analysis

The study’s primary outcome was the prevalence of optimal complementary feeding practices among caregivers and their children aged 6–23 months in Kisoro district, Uganda. The data was analysed using SPSS version 20. The researcher determined the prevalence of five complementary feeding indicators, ISSSFs, CBF, MMF, MDD, and MAD and the factors associated with each indicator at the settings, interpersonal and intrapersonal levels of the SEM. Univariate analysis was performed to provide descriptive statistics of the indicators and factors at each level of the SEM. For bivariate and multivariate analysis, logistic regression models were run to determine the factors significantly associated with optimal complementary feeding practices (OCFPs). The procedure involved employing a stepwise backward approach to construct the models. First, all the independent variables were run separately against the dependent variable to determine Crude Odds Ratios (CORs) at a 95% confidence interval (CI). Secondly, the independent variables with a p-value < 0.05 were retained for the final model and run together against each dependent variable to obtain Adjusted Odds Ratios (AORs) at 95% CI. Variables with a p-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant for association with OCFPs.

Results

Characteristics of the study population

Of the sample of 384 caregivers, 279 (72.7%), worked in the agricultural sector. More than half of the caregivers, 242 (63%) subscribed to the project livelihoods groups. Most of the caregivers lived in small households (HHs) 275 (71.6%). Few of the caregivers, 45 (11.7%), had more than two children under the age of 5 years in their care (1.61 ± 0.73). Most caregivers, 305 (79.4%), were married. More than half of the caregivers possessed more than 29 years of age, 231 (60.2%) on average 36.92 ± 15.54 years. Most of the caregivers were female, 327 (85.2%). About half of the caregivers, 201 (52.3%), had attended primary school. Over seventy per cent (73.2%) had not attended antenatal care (ANC). More than half of the caregivers (66.4%) resided in HHs where the HH head was male. Table 1

Table 1 Characteristics of the study population at settings, interpersonal and intrapersonal levels
Full size table

Food groups consumed by children across the different age categories

Amongst the food groups, grains, roots and tubers were consumed by the majority of the children, 359/384 (93.5%), while eggs were the least consumed at 23/384 (6%), as shown in Table 2. Across the 6–11, 12–17- and 18–23-month age categories, grains, roots, and tubers were the most consumed (86.2%, 95.3% and 98.6%). However, for the least consumed food group, the 6–11 and 12–17 age groups had consumed eggs the least at 6.2% and 5.6%, respectively, while the 18–23 age group had consumed Vitamin-A rich fruits and vegetables the least at 2.0% as shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Percentage distribution of food groups consumed by children across the different age categories (N = 384)
Full size table

Prevalence of the optimal complementary feeding practices

Table 3 shows the prevalence of each complementary feeding indicator for the caregivers of infants 6–23 months of age in Kisoro district. Of the five indicators, 95.06% (77/81) of the caregivers timely introduced solid, semi-solid, or soft foods and 84.81% (67/79) of mothers of infants 12 to 15 months of age had continued breastfeeding their children till one year. Results also showed that 76.56% (294/384) of infants 6 to 23 months met the minimum meal frequency standards (MMF). However, the Minimum Dietary Diversity (MDD) and Minimum Acceptable Diet (MAD) were too low each at 4.43% (17/384) for infants 6 to 23 months of age.

Table 3 Prevalence of each complementary feeding indicator for the caregivers of infants 6–23 months of age in Kisoro district
Full size table

Factors associated with optimal complementary feeding practices

As seen in Table 4, the type of occupation and community group were associated with MMF at the settings level. Caregivers that gained income in other ventures such as begging were 21 times more likely to meet the MMF requirements for their children than those working in the agricultural sector (AOR = 21.21; CI = 2.03—221.26; p = 0.011). Caregivers in the livelihood group were 57.4% less likely to achieve minimum meal frequency for their children than those in the MIYCAN group (AOR = 0. 43; CI = 0.22—0.83; p = 0.012).

Table 4 Factors Associated with Optimal Complementary Feeding Practices of Caregivers and their Children Aged 6–23 Months in Kisoro District, Uganda (N = 384)
Full size table

At the interpersonal level, the study found the number of HH members associated with MDD and MAD, while marital status was associated with CBF. Caregivers in large HHs (seven or more HH members) were 65.4% less likely to offer their children an acceptable and diverse diet than their counterparts in smaller HHs (6 or fewer HH members) (AOR = 0.35; CI = 0.13—0.94; p = 0.037). Caregivers who were not married were 13.25 times more likely to have continued breastfeeding their children by one year of age than their unmarried counterparts (AOR = 13.25; CI = 1.76—100.25; p = 0.012).

At the intrapersonal level, the caregiver's age was associated with ISSSFs, while the child's age was associated with MMF. Caregivers older than 29 years were 1.7 times more likely to introduce solid, semi-solid, and soft foods timely to their children than their younger counterparts (AOR = 1.73; CI = 1.04—2.88; p = 0.035). Caregivers for children aged between 12–17 months were 2.2 times more likely to meet the MMF requirements for their children than caregivers with children in the 6–11 months age bracket (AOR = 2.21; CI = 1.1—4.45; p = 0.026).

Discussion

Of the 81 caregivers with children 6–8 months of age, 95.06% introduced solid, semi-solid or soft foods in a timely fashion, relatively higher than the national prevalence, which stood at 78.8% [10]. However, a study in China amongst persons in rural settings, comparable to this study, obtained similar findings where 95. 4% of the infants aged 6–8 months received solid, semi-solid or soft foods appropriately [27].

Minimum Dietary Diversity was too low at 4.43%, a proportion significantly lower than that for Uganda at 30% [10]. The MDD was exceedingly low, similar to other studies done after the COVID-19 pandemic traversed the globe. Kundu et al.[28] and Minja et al.[29] explained that MDD was heavily associated with the earning potential of HHs and in rural areas where most HHs earned low incomes, and in the presence of the pandemic that negatively impacted income earning, MDD was, in turn, very low. Amongst the food groups, grains, roots and tubers were consumed by most children (93.5%), while eggs were the least consumed at 6%. Similarly, a study carried out in Northern Uganda also found that cereals were more consumed than foods of animal origin, which the people attributed to grains being cheaper to purchase and easier to access than foods of animal origin [3].

The study findings revealed that at the settings level, caregivers that gained income in non-formal or agricultural ventures such as begging and remittances, among others, were more likely to meet the requirements for MMF for their children compared to caregivers working in the agricultural sector. Similarly, studies carried out in Poland, Austria, and Southern Benin reported that parents or caregivers, particularly mothers who were employed or heavily involved in income-generating activities, were less likely to have their children meet the MMF requirements [18, 29]. Our study findings further indicate that caregivers who belonged to village livelihood groups were less likely to achieve minimum meal frequency for their children than those in the MIYCAN group. This is because caregivers in the livelihood group were more involved in income-generating activities, which decreased the time to care for the children and hampered meeting requirements for MMF [18, 29]. On the other hand, caregivers in the MIYCAN groups regularly received nutrition training, a factor documented to favour meeting the requirements of the optimal complementary feeding practices [15, 23].

At the interpersonal level, caregivers in large HHs were less likely to offer their children an acceptable and diverse diet than those living in small HHs. Studies in Ethiopia, Australia, and Benin also concluded that HHs with more than seven residents usually had sub-optimal complementary feeding practices because of the food insecurity brought on by income limitations; the low incomes cannot ably support the large household sizes [18,19,20]. In addition, unmarried caregivers were more likely to have continued breastfeeding their children by one year than married caregivers. This finding differed from what studies in Kenya, and Southern Benin discovered, where married caregivers were more likely to meet the requirements for OCFPs [18, 30]. However, Scott et al. [31] concluded that partners could be deterrents to continued breastfeeding, and mothers that did not have partners would breastfeed longer because they had the time to dedicate to their children and also issues such as sagging breasts and losing the interest of your partner were not a worry [32] promoting longer durations of breastfeeding.

At the intrapersonal level, caregivers older than 29 years were more likely to promptly introduce solid, semi-solid, and soft foods to their children than their younger counterparts. Other studies with similar findings concluded that a mother's age was a predictor for complementary feeding practices because older mothers were more experienced and knowledgeable in taking care of their children compared to their younger, less knowledgeable counterparts [15, 23]. Caregivers for children aged between 12–17 months were more likely to meet the MMF requirements for their children compared to caregivers with children in the 6–11 months age bracket. A study with similar findings explained that children within the former age bracket had likely settled into the pattern of the family meals, which were the prescribed number of times a child that age should be fed, lending to meeting the MMF requirements [33].

Recommendations

Increased advocacy by nutrition champions and organisations for augmented funding to the nutrition sector; to support the direct implementation of the IYCF guidelines and Multisectoral Nutrition Action Plans. The government and policymakers must strengthen existing initiatives and develop new intervention measures to increase the citizenry's socioeconomic position, education status, and occupational opportunities for better CFPs. More research in other regions of the country on factors associated with IYCF.

Conclusion

The prevalence of Minimum Acceptable Diet (MAD) and Minimum Dietary Diversity (MDD) was very low in Kisoro district, putting these children at a very high risk of becoming stunted. At all levels of the SEM, there was at least a factor associated with OCFPs intimating the need for all sectors to work together to break down barriers preventing caregivers from meeting requirements for OCFPs as we forge forward to end malnutrition for all.

Study limitations

The study utilised secondary data collected in Kisoro district, so the findings may not be ably generalised to other districts not in the Kigezi region. In addition, the dataset provided to the study was from rural communities, and the findings may not translate to urban communities.

For Operational Definitions see Additional File 3

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included as Additional File 1.

Abbreviations

ANC:

Antenatal Care

AORs:

Adjusted Odd Ratios

CBF:

Continued breastfeeding

CORs:

Crude Odd Ratios

HH:

Household

ISSSFs:

Introduction to Solid, Semi-solid, and Soft Foods

IYCF:

Infant and Young Child Feeding

MAD:

Minimum Acceptable Diet

MDD:

Minimum Dietary Diversity

MIYCAN:

Maternal, Infant, Young Child, Adolescent, and New-born

MMF:

Minimum Meal Frequency

OCFPs:

Optimal Complementary Feeding Practices

WHO:

World Health Organisation

References

  1. Black RE, Alderman H, Bhutta ZA, Gillespie S, Haddad L, Horton S, et al. Maternal and child nutrition: building momentum for impact. Lancet. 2013;382:372–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Danaei G, Andrews KG, Sudfeld CR, Fink G, McCoy DC, Peet E, et al. Risk Factors for Childhood Stunting in 137 Developing Countries: A Comparative Risk Assessment Analysis at Global, Regional, and Country Levels. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1002164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mokori A. Nutritional status, complementary feeding practices and feasible strategies to promote nutrition in returnee children aged 6–23 months in northern Uganda. South African J Clin Nutr. 2012;25:173–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organisation. Infant and Young Child Feeding. 2018. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding. Accessed 12 Dec 2019.

  5. Micha R, Mannar V, Afshin A, Allemandi L, Baker P, Battersby J, et al. 2020 Global nutrition report: action on equity to end malnutrition. 2020.

  6. Ickes SB, Hurst TE, Flax VL. Maternal Literacy, Facility Birth, and Education Are Positively Associated with Better Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices and Nutritional Status among Ugandan Children. J Nutr. 2015;145:2578–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Netting MJ, Makrides M. Complementary foods: guidelines and practices. In: Complementary feeding: building the foundations for a healthy life. Karger Publishers; 2017. p. 1–12.

  8. Ruel MT. Measuring infant and young child complementary feeding practices: Indicators, current practice, and research gaps. Complementary feeding: building the foundations for a healthy life. 2017;87:73–87.

  9. Hyvönen A. Complementary Feeding Perceptions and Practices in the Light of the Health Belief Model. 2019.

  10. Uganda Bureau of Statistics U, Uganda Demographic ICF, Survey H. Kampala, Uganda and Rockville, Maryland. USA: UBOS and ICF; 2016. p. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  11. White JM, Bégin F, Kumapley R, Murray C, Krasevec J. Complementary feeding practices: current global and regional estimates. Matern Child Nutr. 2017;13:e12505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahoya B, Kavle JA, Straubinger S, Gathi CM. Accelerating progress for complementary feeding in Kenya: Key government actions and the way forward. Matern Child Nutr. 2019;15:e12723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Agaba E, Ghosh S, Griffiths J. Understanding pathways to better nutrition at district level: lessons from Uganda. African J Food Agric Nutr Dev. 2017;17:12837-12853–12853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stewart CP, Iannotti L, Dewey KG, Michaelsen KF, Onyango AW. Contextualising complementary feeding in a broader framework for stunting prevention. Matern Child Nutr. 2013;9:27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wondu Garoma B, Yang N. Determinants of suboptimal complementary feeding practices among children aged 6–23 months in selected urban slums of Oromia zones (Ethiopia). J Nutr Food Sci. 2017;7:2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Epheson B, Birhanu Z, Tamiru D, Feyissa GT. Complementary feeding practices and associated factors in Damot Weydie District, Welayta zone. South Ethiopia BMC Public Health. 2018;18:419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumera G, Tsedal E, Ayana M. Dietary diversity and associated factors among children of Orthodox Christian mothers/caregivers during the fasting season in Dejen District, North West Ethiopia. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2018;15:16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchodigni IM, Amoussa Hounkpatin W, Ntandou-Bouzitou G, Avohou H, Termote C, Kennedy G, et al. Complementary feeding practices: determinants of dietary diversity and meal frequency among children aged 6–23 months in Southern Benin. Food Sec. 2017;9:1117–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leonard D, Aquino D, Hadgraft N, Thompson F, Marley JV. Poor nutrition from first foods: a cross-sectional study of complementary feeding of infants and young children in six remote Aboriginal communities across northern Australia. Nutr Diet. 2017;74:436–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kassa T, Meshesha B, Haji Y, Ebrahim J. Appropriate complementary feeding practices and associated factors among mothers of children age 6–23 months in Southern Ethiopia, 2015. BMC Pediatr. 2016;16:131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Na M, Aguayo VM, Arimond M, Mustaphi P, Stewart CP. Predictors of complementary feeding practices in Afghanistan: Analysis of the 2015 Demographic and Health Survey. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;14(Suppl):4.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ng CS, Dibley MJ, Agho KE. Complementary feeding indicators and determinants of poor feeding practices in Indonesia: a secondary analysis of 2007 Demographic and Health Survey data. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15:827–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nkoka O, Mhone TG, Ntenda PAM. Factors associated with complementary feeding practices among children aged 6–23 mo in Malawi: an analysis of the Demographic and Health Survey 2015–2016. Int Health. 2018;10:466–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kampire P, Mubangizi BC. Intra-household Bargaining in Rural Uganda: Implications for Child Nutrition. Management & Organizational Efficiency: Exploring Current Trends And Practices. 2017;79–100.

  25. Agaba E, Pomeroy-Stevens A, Ghosh S, Griffiths JK. Assessing progress in implementing Uganda’s Nutrition Action Plan: district-level insights. Field Exchange 54. 2017;:55.

  26. Adam AM. Sample Size Determination in Survey Research. J Sci Res Rep. 2020:90–7.

  27. Kundu S, Banna MHA, Sayeed A, Sultana MS, Brazendale K, Harris J, et al. Determinants of household food security and dietary diversity during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh. Public Health Nutr. 2021;24:1079–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Minja EG, Swai JK, Mponzi W, Ngowo H, Okumu F, Gerber M, et al. Dietary diversity among households living in Kilombero district, in Morogoro region, South-Eastern Tanzania. J Agric Food Res. 2021;5:100171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zielinska MA, Rust P, Masztalerz-Kozubek D, Bichler J, Hamułka J. Factors Influencing the Age of Complementary Feeding—A Cross-Sectional Study from Two European Countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:3799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kimani-Murage EW, Madise NJ, Fotso J-C, Kyobutungi C, Mutua MK, Gitau TM, et al. Patterns and determinants of breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices in urban informal settlements,Nairobi Kenya. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Scott J, Landers M, Hughes R, Binns C. Factors associated with breastfeeding at discharge and duration of breastfeeding. J Paediatr Child Health. 2001;37:254–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gao H, Wang Q, Hormann E, Stuetz W, Stiller C, Biesalski HK, et al. Breastfeeding practices on postnatal wards in urban and rural areas of the Deyang region, Sichuan province of China. Int Breastfeed J. 2016;11:11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mokori A, Schonfeldt H, Hendriks SL. Child factors associated with complementary feeding practices in Uganda. South African J Clin Nutr. 2017;30:7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the staff of USAID/ICAN for availing of the data used in the study and to Dr Peterson Kato Kikomeko and Nassamula Brenda for their guidance in analysing the data.

Funding

This study received no grants from any funding agency from the public, for-profit, or non-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. P.O. Box 3023, Kampala, Uganda

    Tracy Lukiya Birungi

  2. Faculty of Health Sciences, Uganda Martyrs University, Rubaga, P.O. Box 5498, Kampala, Uganda

    Tracy Lukiya Birungi & David Livingstone Ejalu

Authors
  1. Tracy Lukiya Birungi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Livingstone Ejalu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.L.B. designed the study, conducted the analysis, and wrote the manuscript. D.L.E. supervised the study design, data analysis, and manuscript development. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tracy Lukiya Birungi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was performed following the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and the principles of Good Practice in Secondary Data Analysis. The researcher received clearance to conduct the study from the Uganda Martyrs University Research Ethics Committee. Consent to use the data was also obtained from the USAID-funded ICAN project. Anonymity was ensured so that there was no re-identification of participants and the confidentiality of the information gathered was guaranteed. The researcher also worked to maintain that the data used did not harm or distress the participants' lives.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

40795_2022_581_MOESM1_ESM.xls

Additional file 1.

Additional file 2.

Results of the univariate analysis of the complementary feeding practices.

Additional file 3.

Operational definitions.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Birungi, T.L., Ejalu, D.L. Optimal complementary feeding practices among caregivers and their children aged 6–23 months in Kisoro district, Uganda. BMC Nutr 8, 81 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-022-00581-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-022-00581-0

Keywords

  • Optimal Complementary Feeding Practices
  • Caregivers
  • Children

BMC Nutrition

ISSN: 2055-0928

Contact us