Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Serum parathyroid hormone is related to genetic variation in vitamin D binding protein with respect to total, free, and bioavailable 25-hydroxyvitamin D in middle-aged Caucasians – a cross-sectional study

BMC NutritionBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted20162:46

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-016-0085-3

Received: 10 February 2016

Accepted: 13 July 2016

Published: 22 July 2016

Abstract

Background

Vitamin D binding protein (DBP) binds vitamin D and its plasma metabolites, including 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), in the circulation. Only a small fraction circulates free (free 25(OH)D). Genetic variation of the GC gene, encoding DBP, has been associated with 25(OH)D concentrations. The roles of DBP and free 25(OH)D concentrations in the biological actions of vitamin D remain unclear.

Methods

We assessed the relationship between GC gene variants rs4588, rs7041, and rs705124, and serum total 25(OH)D, free and bioavailable 25(OH)D, and serum DBP and parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations in 622 Caucasian females (421) and males (201) aged 37–47 years. Concentrations of 25(OH)D, DBP, and PTH were measured from fasting blood samples. Dietary intakes of vitamin D and Ca were evaluated using 1-month food use frequency data, which were collected by a validated Food Frequency Questionnaire on vitamin D and calcium intakes. The subjects filled in the questionnaire covering overall health, medications, use of vitamin D and calcium supplements, and holidays in sunny locations. Three SNPs in the GC gene were genotyped: rs4588, rs7041, and rs705124. The SNPs rs4588 and rs7041 combine to form six common diplotypes. Free and bioavailable 25(OH)D were calculated by using specific binding coefficients. Differences among the diplo- and haplotypes of the GC gene in measures of 25(OH)D, DBP, and PTH were tested by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) using appropriate covariates.

Results

We found significant variation among the SNPs rs4588 and rs7041 variants in DBP, total, free, and bioavailable 25(OH)D, and PTH. DBP concentration was lowest in genotype GC2/2 in both diplotypes and haplotypes (p = 0.039 and 0.039, respectively). The lowest 25(OH)D concentrations were found in diplotype variants GC1S/2, GC1S/F, and GC2/2 (p = 0.033), but free and bioavailable 25(OH)D concentrations were highest in the GC2/2 variant after corrected with a genotype-specific binding coefficient (p < 0.001 in both groups). Surprisingly, one of the lowest PTH concentrations was also present in variant GC2/2 in diplotypes (p = 0.040 of the overall ANCOVA analysis of PTH). Among SNP rs705124, there was a difference only in PTH concentrations (p = 0.013).

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that genetic variation of the DBP coding gene, and free concentrations of 25(OH)D may be relevant when vitamin D status, metabolism, and action are investigated.

Keywords

Vitamin D binding protein PTH 25(OH)D Free 25(OH)

Background

Vitamin D, obtained from the diet or produced from 7-dehydrocholesterol in the skin during UVB-exposure, is hydroxylated into prohormone 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) in the liver. Serum 25(OH)D is the biomarker most commonly used for describing vitamin D status. The active metabolite, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D3), is produced in the kidneys and probably also in several other tissues, and has an important role in regulating calcium homeostasis and skeletal mineral balance as well as having roles in many other physiological systems. Vitamin D binding protein (DBP) transports 25(OH)D from the liver to the kidneys and other tissues. DBP binds 85–90 % of the total circulating 25(OH)D and 85 % of the total circulating 1,25(OH)2D3. Albumin and lipoproteins bind the remaining 15 %, but with a lower affinity. Less than 1 % of the vitamin D metabolites are free in circulation [1]. In addition to being a transport protein, DBP is suggested to have a role in bone formation. In its deglycosylated form, DBP can act as a macrophage activating factor and produce morphological changes in osteoclasts and also activate them, which is correlated with enhanced bone resorption [24]. The DBP coding gene, GC gene, has two well-known missense variations in exon 11: a G > A substitution, which results in p.T416K, and a C > A substitution, which results in T420K, leading to a Threonine/Lysine amino acid change [5]. Haplotypes of the nucleotide changes result in the protein isoforms GC1S, GC2, and GC1F. Thus, the two gene variants, rs4588 and rs7041, in general combine to form six diplotypes: GC1S/1S, GC1S/2, GC1F/1 F, GC1F/2, GC1F/1S, and GC2/2 [6, 7].

The free hormone hypothesis states that only hormones not bound to binding protein can enter the cells and have actions there [8]. Because the affinity of albumin to 25(OH)D is very weak, the bioavailable 25(OH)D represents the sum of free and albumin bound fraction of 25(OH)D. S25(OH)D is commonly known to enter the cells in a 25(OH)D-DBP complex via a megalin-mediated receptor. However, many tissues, especially extra-renal tissues, do not express megalin, and in these cases unbound free or bioavailable 25(OH)D might be the form in which vitamin D enters the cells. Thus, these metabolites have been suggested to be better markers of vitamin D status/concentrations [911].

Several studies have reported an association between GC genetic variation and serum 25(OH)D concentrations. There is also evidence that DBP concentration and affinity to 25(OH)D varies between the GC genotypes, and this variation may be of importance when serum 25(OH)D concentrations are interpreted [6]. It is currently unclear whether the variation in DBP concentration results in a change in biologically available 25(OH)D (free 25(OH)D) [12].

PTH is a key regulator of calcium balance in the body, and it correlates inversely with 25(OH)D. Increased concentrations of PTH affect bone negatively [13]. We hypothesized that free and bioavailable 25(OH)D as well as the genetic variation in the DBP could affect these associations. The aim of this study was to examine the association between GC genotypes, DBP, serum total, free, and bioavailable 25(OH)D, and PTH concentration in an adult Caucasian population.

Methods

Study subjects and study design

The data for this study originates from the “Dietary phosphorus and health outcomes (PHOMI) study”, a cross-sectional study of 653 individuals of Caucasian background aged 37–47 years living in the Helsinki area (60°N, southern Finland) who were derived from the Population Register Center. The study design and methods are described in detail in Itkonen et al. [14]. The final number of the subjects was intended to be 800 persons in the original study (400 females and 400 males). The number is based on a power of 80 % (α = 0.05) to find a 4 % difference (standard deviation, SD-0.050 g/cm2) in distal radius bone mineral density between the highest and lowest phosphorus intake tertiles (data not shown), and taking into account the initial dropout of 40 % (based on 1200 subjects).

The initial exclusion criterion was pregnancy. Subjects visited the research unit two times during spring 2010: on the first visit (January or March), fasting blood samples and spot urine samples were collected and subjects were advised to fill in the study form, which included a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) concerning vitamin D and calcium (Ca) intake, and a background questionnaire. All forms were checked by the researchers, and additional information was requested if needed. Due to missing data (e.g. background, blood sample, or genotype), the total number of subjects was 622 (421 women and 201 men). Morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40) and chronically ill individuals were excluded from the analysis.

Dietary intake and background data collection

The dietary intakes of vitamin D and Ca during the preceding month were evaluated using a validated FFQ covering over 70 foods [15]. The subjects completed a questionnaire on medical history, medications and overall health, use of vitamin D and Ca supplements, and details about their physical activity. The average physical activity was measured in minutes per week and included all reported supervised and unsupervised exercise as well as functional exercise. Holidays spent in sunny locations during winter 2009–2010, from November 2009 to January 2010 (group 1) or from November 2009 to March 2010 (group 2), served as a measure of sunshine exposure. Sunny locations were defined as locations with a possibility for exposure to UV-irradiation. The persons who used sunbed over ten times during 2008–2010 were excluded from the analysis (N = 14).

Genotype analysis of the GC gene

SNPs covering the DBP gene region were selected from the International HapMap Project database. The data is available in International database 1000 Genomes Browser (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/variation/tools/1000genomes/). We used the function “Download tag SNP data” and selected three polymorphisms as representative of the polymorphisms in the DBP gene region. These were polymorphisms that represented the linkage disequilibrium structure of a region. Preference was given to polymorphisms with high heterozygosity levels and SNPs that are functional and have previously shown association in other studies. CEU population was used as a reference when selecting these three SNPs.

The selected SNPs were genotyped by using TaqMan chemistry on an automatic sequence-detection instrument (ABI Prism 7900HT, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Assays and reagents were supplied by Applied Biosystems. Genotypes were analyzed with SDS 2.3 and haplotypes with HaploView 4.2. The following SNPs were genotyped: rs4588 (Taqman SNP Assay ID: C___8278879_10), rs7041 (Taqman SNP Assay ID: C___3133594_30), and rs705124 (Taqman SNP Assay ID: C___8278822_10).

DBP analysis

DBP was isolated from plasma samples and protein concentrations were determined with a commercially available ELISA assay (Immundiagnostik AG, Bensheim, Germany). This method uses polyclonal DBP antibodies.

Biochemistry

Twelve-hour fasting blood samples were collected on the first visit. All samples were obtained between 7:30 and 9:15 a.m., and serum was extracted from blood by centrifugation (except for whole-blood samples for DNA isolation) and stored immediately after sampling at −20 °C to −70 °C to await analysis. Serum Ca, albumin, and creatinine were analyzed by a photometric method by using a Konelab20 automatic analyzer (Thermo Clinical Labsystems, Espoo, Finland). Inter and intra CV%s were <4.6 for the above-mentioned analyses. S-25(OH)D concentrations were analyzed by using an IDS enzyme immunoassay kit (Immunodiagnostics Systems Ltd., Boldon, UK). Inter and intra CV%s were 2.7 and 3.2, respectively. Serum PTH concentrations were analyzed by using an immunoluminescence-based method (Immulite1000, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, NY, USA). Inter CV% was 8.0 and intra CV% <5.5.

Calculation of free and bioavailable 25(OH)D

Calculation of free 25(OH)D was performed using the following equation [1, 11]:
$$ \left[F\right]=\frac{\left[\mathrm{T}\right]}{\left(1+\mathrm{KALB}\ \left[\mathrm{ALB}\right]+\mathrm{KDBP}\left[\mathrm{D}BP\right]\right)} $$

Where T and F are the total and free vitamin D concentrations, respectively, and KALB and KDBP are the affinity constants for 25(OH)D with albumin and DBP. When the diplotype- and haplotype-corrected free and bioavailable 25(OH)D values were calculated, the affinity constants of 25(OH)D with albumin and DBP were replaced with the genotype-specific affinity constants.

The affinity constant used for albumin was 6 × 105 and for DBP 7 × 108. Haplotype-corrected free 25(OH)D concentration was calculated by placing a haplotype-specific affinity constant in the formula by Arnaud et al. [6]. Diplotype-corrected free 25(OH)D concentrations were calculated based on the affinity constants for GC1S, GC1F, and GC2. The binding coefficients of the diplotypes were calculated as the mean of the corresponding two haplotypes according to Johnsen et al. [10]. The diplotype-corrected affinity constants were as follows: 1S/1S = 6 × 108, 1S/2 = 4.8 × 108, 1F1F = 11.2 × 108, 1 F/1S = 8.6 × 108, 1 F/2 = 7.4 × 108 and 2/2 = 3.6 + 108. Bioavailable 25(OH)D and the haplotype/diplotype-corrected bioavailable 25(OH)D were calculated as a sum of free 25(OH)D and albumin-bound 25(OH)D.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive data are reported as means ± SD. We used a Chi-square test to assess whether DBP genotype distributions were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Associations between variables of interest were tested with the Pearson correlation. Logarithmic transformation was applied to non-Gaussian variables. If outliers were detected, Spearman correlation was used instead. ANCOVA analysis was used to test variation among the GC genotypes in serum total, free, bioavailable, and genotype-corrected 25(OH)D concentrations. Vitamin D intake, S-PTH concentration, holidays in sunny locations, sex and BMI was used as covariates. ANCOVA analysis was also applied to test the variation between the GC genotypes and DBP as well as between the GC genotypes and PTH. In the DBP analysis, sex and BMI were used as covariates and in the PTH analysis, 25(OH)D and Ca intake were the covariates. Tests for linear trend among the genotypes in the 25(OH)D, PTH, and DBP concentrations were performed by using contrast analysis. In this analysis, the three genotypes of the SNP 4588 were coded as −1, 0, and 1.

All calculations were performed using PASW Statistics version 18.0.2 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Characteristics of participants

The background characteristics of all subjects are presented in Table 1. Background characteristics stratified by genotypes are presented in Additional file 1: Table S1. Women and men differed significantly in height, weight, BMI, history of smoking, serum albumin concentrations, and amount of physical activity (Additional file 2: Table S2).
Table 1

Characteristics of all subjects

Variable

N = 622

Men (%)

32

Women (%)

68

Age (years)

42

±

3

Height (cm)

1.70

±

0.1

Weight (kg)

76

±

14

Body mass index (kg/m2)

26.2

±

4.3

Calcium intake (mg/day)

1253

±

530

Vitamin D intake (μg)

15.1

±

13

S-25(OH)D (nmol/L)

55.7

±

19.2

Free 25(OH)D (pmol/L)

12.2

±

4.9

Bioavailable 25(OH)D (nmol/L)

4.80

±

2.0

S-PTH (ng/L)

54.6

±

25

S-DBP (mg/L)

368

±

88

S-Albumin (g/L)

43.7

±

3.0

All physical activity (min/week)

481

±

372

History of regular smokinga (%)

46

Current Smokers:

Cigarettes per day

 1–5

17 %

 6 or more

83 %

Values are presented as mean ± SD

aat least one cigarette per day for 6 months

The mean total vitamin D intake was 15.1 μg/d, and intake from supplements was 7.2 μg/d. No significant difference was present in vitamin D intake among the genotypes. The mean Ca intake was 1253 mg/d and intake from supplements 87 mg/d. The mean daily vitamin D and Ca intakes (including supplements) were in line with Nordic recommendations for vitamin D and Ca intake [16].

The mean serum 25(OH)D concentration in the total population was 56 nmol/L and the mean serum PTH concentration 54.6 (±25) ng/L. The mean DBP concentration was 368 (±88) mg/L. No significant correlation was found between the 25(OH)D concentrations and the DBP concentrations (r = −0.018, p = 0.678). A negative correlation was present between S-PTH and total 25(OH)D (r = −0.235, p < 0.001). Similar negative correlations were also observed between free and bioavailable 25(OH)D and S-PTH (r = −0.223, p < 0.001; r = −0.217, p < 0.001). Total 25(OH)D correlated negatively with BMI (r = −0.173, p < 0.001).

Genotype, haplotype, and allele distributions

The distribution of the GC genotypes was as follows: 64 % GC1/1, 31.5 % GC1/2, and 4.5 % GC2/2. When the SNPs rs4588 and rs7041 were combined, they formed six diplotypes with distributions of 47 % GC1S/1S, 25 % GC1S/2, 2 % GC1F/1 F, 6 % GC1F/2, 16 % GC1F/1S, and 4 % GC2/2. In addition, there were a few undetectable individuals that could have been representing some of the rare diplotypes. Haplotype analysis (combining rs4588 and rs7041) revealed three different haplotypes, corresponding to the three GC protein isoforms GC1S, GC1F, and GC2. The distribution of the haplotypes was as follows: 88 % GCIS, 3.7 % GCIF, and 8.5 % GC2. The distribution of the third SNP rs705124 was 61 % genotype 1, 34 % genotype 2, and 5 % genotype 3. The distributions of the rs4588, rs7041, and rs705124 genotypes were in accordance with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p = 0.73, 0.12, 0.80, respectively).

Associations of GC genotypes with DBP, 25(OH)D, and PTH concentrations

DBP concentrations in the diplotype and haplotype groups differed from each other significantly (p = 0.039, 0.039, respectively, overall ANCOVA analysis), one of the lowest concentration being in persons with the GC2/2 genotype (Fig. 1a). Serum 25(OH)D concentrations differed among the SNP rs4588 genotypes (p = 0.031, ANCOVA) and also between the six diplotypes of rs4588 and rs7041 combined (Fig. 1b) (p = 0.033, ANCOVA), after adjustment for the covariates S-PTH, vitamin D intake, sunlight exposure, BMI and sex. Also PTH concentrations differed between the diplotypes (p = 0.040), adjusted for 25(OH)D and calcium intake and sex (Fig. 1c).
Fig. 1

a Association of GC diplotypes with DBP concentrations (p = 0.039), b 25(OH)D concentrations (p = 0.033), c PTH concentrations (p = 0.040), d serum free and diplotype-corrected free 25(OH)D concentrations (NS and p < 0.001, respectively), and e serum bioavailable and diplotype-corrected bioavailable concentrations (NS and p < 0.001, respectively). The variables were adjusted for PTH, vitamin D intake, sunlight exposure, sex and BMI (B,D,E) or for 25(OH)D and Ca intake (C) or for BMI and sex (A). Results are shown as estimated means ± SE, ANCOVA

The difference in S-PTH between the haplotypes was borderline significant (p = 0.078), and a linear trend was present (p = 0.044) (Table 3). Among the SNP rs705124 genotypes, a difference between PTH concentrations was observed (p = 0.016, ANCOVA, data not shown).

Concentrations of free and bioavailable 25(OH)D among genotypes

Neither the concentration of free nor bioavailable 25(OH)D concentration differed among the diplo-/haplotypes. However, when the values were genotype-corrected, the highest concentration of free 25(OH)D was found in diplotype 2/2 (p < 0.001, ANCOVA) and haplotype GC2 (p < 0.001). Similar differences were found among the bioavailable 25(OH)D concentrations (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1d, e, Tables 2 and 3). The number of subjects in Tables 2 and 3 are presented as a range because the number varied depending on the value analyzed.
Table 2

Comparison of total 25(OH)D, free and diplotype-corrected free 25(OH)D, and PTH and DBP concentrations among the GC diplotypes

GC diplotypes

GC1S/1S

GC 1S/2

GC 1S/1 F

GC 1 F/1 F

GC 1 F/2

GC 2/2

 

Dependent variable

      

ANCOVA p-value

S-25(OH)D (nmol/L)

55.9 (280)

±

0.99

51.9 (152)

±

1.34

50.2 (13)

±

4.6

55.1 (38)

±

2.7

58.6 (90)

±

1.7

52.5 (26)

±

3.3

0.033 a

Free 25(OH)D (pmol/L)

12.2 (236)

±

0.29

11.7 (121)

±

0.40

10.1 (10)

±

1.40

11.6 (31)

±

0.80

12.5 (78)

±

0.50

12.6 (24)

±

0.90

0.491a

Diplotype corrected free 25(OH)D (pmol/L)d

14.1 (236)

±

0.30

6.06 (121)

±

0.42

6.40 (10)

±

1.47

9.65 (31)

±

0.85

12.2 (78)

±

0.53

23.1 (24)

±

0.95

<0.001a

Bioavailable 25(OH)D (nmol/L)

4.81 (236)

±

0.12

4.70 (121)

±

0.16

3.97 (10)

±

0.57

4.62 (31)

±

0.33

5.01 (78)

±

0.20

5.07 (24)

±

0.37

0.469a

Diplotype corrected bioavailable 25(OH)D (nmol/L)d

5.60 (235)

±

0.13

2.44 (121)

±

0.17

2.50 (10)

±

0.60

3.86 (31)

±

0.35

4.92 (78)

±

0.22

9.25 (24)

±

0.39

<0.001 a

S-DBP (mg/L)

369 (238)

±

5.55

360 (121)

±

7.78

364 (10)

±

27.1

388(31)

±

15.4

380 (78)

±

9.7

321 (24)

±

17.5

0.039 b

S-PTH (ng/L)

55.0 (289)

±

1.44

56.8 (157)

±

1.96

60.6 (13)

±

6.78

45.6 (38)

±

3.96

57.5 (92)

±

2.55

46.0 (26)

±

4.79

0.040 c

Diplotype means were compared with ANCOVA ± SE. The values are adjusted estimates from ANCOVA. N in parenthesis

Significant p-values are indicated in bold

aAdjusted for age, S-PTH, vitamin D intake, sunlight exposure and sex

bAdjusted for BMI and sex

cS-25(OH)D, Ca intake

GC diplotype was used as a fixed factor

dDiplotype-corrected free and bioavailable 25(OH)D values were calculated by placing a diplotype-specific binding coefficient into the free and bioavailable formulae

Table 3

Comparison of 25(OH)D, free- and diplotype-corrected free 25(OH)D, and DBP and PTH concentrations among the GC haplotypes

GC haplotype

GC1S

GC1F

GC2

ANCOVA p-value

Dependent variable

S-25(OH)D (nmol/L)

57.1 (281)

±

1.04

50.6 (13)

±

4.9

52.7 (25)

±

3.53

0.231a

Free 25(OH)D (pmol/L)

12.5 (237)

±

0.30

10.1 (10)

±

1.46

12.6 (23)

±

0.97

0.280a

Diplotype corrected free 25(OH)D (pmol/L)e

14.2 (237)

±

0.35

6.30 (10)

±

1.70

22.8 (23)

±

1.12

<0.001 a

Bioavailable 25(OH)D (nmol/L)

4.92 (237)

±

0.12

3.98 (10)

±

0.59

5.01 (23)

±

0.39

0.261a

Diplotype corrected bioavailable 25(OH)D (nmol/L)e

5.61 (237)

±

0.14

2.47 (10)

±

0.68

9.15 (23)

±

0.45

<0.001 a

S-DBP (mg/L)

369 (240)

±

5.60

364 (10)

±

27.4

320 (23)

±

18.1

0.039 b

S-PTH (ng/L)

54.5 (283)

±

1.39

60.7 (13)

±

6.52

44.7 (25)

±

4.70

0.078cd

Haplotype means were compared with ANCOVA ± SE. The values are adjusted estimates from ANCOVA. N in parenthesis

Significant p-values are indicated in bold

aAdjusted for age, S-PTH, vitamin D intake, sunlight exposure and sex

bAdjusted for BMI and sex

cS-25(OH)D, Ca intake

da linear trend, p = 0.044

GC haplotype was used as a fixed factor

eHaplotype-corrected free and bioavailable 25(OH)D values were calculated by placing a haplotype-specific binding coefficient into the free and bioavailable formulae

Discussion

We found differences in the total, genotype-corrected free, and bioavailable 25(OH)D concentrations and the DBP concentrations among GC genotypes, indicating that the biological response could possibly be modified by the availability of 25(OH)D. Moreover, some genotypes with low 25(OH)D concentrations also had low PTH concentrations, which is contrary to the usual finding for this relationship. Interestingly, the free and bioavailable 25(OH)D concentrations were high in these groups, which could explain the low PTH concentration.

Previous studies have shown the critical role of GC genotypes and serum GC protein concentration for vitamin D metabolism [11, 12, 17, 18]. The 25(OH)D concentrations have been suggested to differ among DBP phenotypes and genotypes. In this study, we wanted to extend the observations to diplotypes and haplotypes. We discovered a significant difference in 25(OH)D concentrations among the SNP rs4588 genotypes. A similar difference was also found among the diplotypes when two SNPs, rs4588 and rs7041, were combined. Among the SNP rs4588, the lowest 25(OH)D concentration was seen in individuals with the GC2/2 genotype and the highest in individuals with GC1/1. Within diplotypes, the difference was significant between genotypes 1S/2 and 1 F/2, the 25(OH)D concentration being lowest in genotype 1S/1 F and highest in 1 F/2. Our results are in line with earlier studies [1821]. Most of the studies have focused on the two common SNPs rs4588 and rs7041, but they are seldom used in combination to form diplotypes.

In this study, the DBP concentrations varied significantly among the GC genotypes. The lowest DBP concentration was found in GC2/2 and the highest in GC1/1. In diplotypes, the highest concentration was found in GC1F/1 F and the lowest in GC2/2. A significant difference in DBP concentration emerged between GC1F/2 and GC2/2. Also haplotype-corrected DBP values differed; the highest value was observed in GC1S and the lowest in GC2. Variation in DBP concentrations based on DBP genotypes has been reported also in previous studies, but the results have not been consistent [11, 18, 21]. Powe et al. [11] reported that the T-allele at rs7041 was associated with decreased concentrations of DBP, and allele A at rs4588 was associated with higher DBP, after accounting for rs7041. In a study conducted with African American and Caucasian American subjects, GC1S homozygotes had the highest DBP concentration, GC2 had an intermediate concentration, and GC1F had the lowest concentration [18]. Similar to our results, a Danish study observed that GC2 homozygotes generally had lower DBP concentrations than the other genotypes [21].

However, criticism has been directed at some of the measurement protocols used by earlier studies for determining the DBP concentration. It has been suggested that studies based on monoclonal antibodies [11, 18] may be inaccurate because the assay might not have equal affinity for all genotypes. The use of polyclonal antibodies instead has been proposed [22].

Based on the free hormone hypothesis, the free fractions could correlate better with biological actions of vitamin D than the total 25(OH)D [9]. In order to test the free and the bioavailable hypotheses, we calculated the concentrations of unbound “free” 25(OH)D and bioavailable 25(OH)D. A Norwegian study found that adjusting for DBP phenotype-specific (SNPs rs4588 and rs7041 combined) binding coefficients affected the calculated free and bioavailable concentrations by up to 37.5 % [10]. Thus, additional genotype adjustment was made for diplotype- and haplotype-specific binding coefficients. In our study, serum free or bioavailable 25(OH)D concentrations did not differ significantly between the genotypes. However, after adjustment for diplotype-specific binding coefficients a significant difference emerged in free and bioavailable values among the haplotypes and diplotypes. The highest concentrations of free and bioavailable 25(OH)D were found in GC 2/2 and the lowest in haplotype GC1F and diplotypes GC1S/2, GC1S/2, and 1S/1 F. Powe et al. [11] stated that genetic polymorphism explained almost 10 % of the variation in 25(OH)D levels. In their study, the T-allele at rs7041 was associated with decreased levels of vitamin D-binding protein in both black and white Americans. In white individuals, the A-allele at rs4588 was associated with decreased levels of total 25(OH)D.

An inverse association between 25(OH)D and PTH has been found in numerous studies. PTH has therefore been suggested to be used as a health outcome reference for optimal vitamin D status. However, the cut-off values for PTH and 25(OH)D differ considerably among studies, making this very difficult. Moreover, large variation exists in PTH at specific 25(OH)D concentrations [13]. In our previous study in Finnish children and adolescents, we observed that GC2 phenotype was associated with the lowest 25(OH)D concentrations and that there was an inverse association between 25(OH)D and PTH within the genotypes [23]. Interestingly, the GC2/2 genotype, which had the lowest 25(OH)D, also had the lowest PTH concentration, which is contrary to the association in general. Here, we found differences in PTH concentrations among the diplotypes and a similar linear trend in haplotypes. GC2/2, with the second lowest 25(OH)D among diplotypes, also had the lowest PTH.

In accord with our finding, a Danish study observed that rs4588-AA carriers had the lowest prevalence of 25(OH)D > 50 nmol/L in a vitamin D fortification group, but in the control group the SNP rs4588 carriers had the lowest prevalence of low vitamin D status. They state that this may suggest that rs4588 carriers have low, yet stable 25(OH)D concentrations. The rs4588-AA genotype had also lower PTH levels and 25(OH)D concentrations relative to rs4588-CC or rs4588-CA carriers [20]. In comparison, the genetic variance in GC significantly contributed to circulating DBP as well as to 25(OH)D in a study in North American children [24]. However, in that study both total and free 25(OH)D correlated inversely with PTH, and this correlation was independent of DBP genotype. Interestingly, we also noted a difference in PTH concentrations among SNP rs705124, which has not been reported in earlier studies. Thus, our results emphasize the importance of the genetic variation in DBP in vitamin D and mineral metabolism.

In addition to renal production of 1,25(OH)2D3, there is local production in non-renal tissues. Based on our previous findings and the results in this paper, we hypothesize that free 25(OH)D may enter the parathyroid glands and might be converted locally to 1,25(OH)2D3 with the help of cytochrome p450 27B1 enzyme (CYP27B1) in the cell. The higher amount of 1,25(OH)2D3 could suppress the production of PTH and explain the lower concentration of PTH with the GC2/2 genotype. Our results support those of Ritter et al. [25], who demonstrated the presence of 25(OH)D 1-alpha-hydroxylase (1alpha-OHase) in cultured bovine parathyroid cells and showed that the enzyme was functionally active, converting 25(OH)D to 1-hydroxylated metabolites and inducing the major enzyme involved in the degradation of calcitriol, 25(OH)D 24-hydroxylase (24-OHase, CYP24A1). This together with the fact that vitamin D receptor (VDR) was expressed in the cells suggests an autocrine/paracrine function for locally produced 1,25(OH)2D3. They showed that 25(OH)D suppressed the production of PTH without the involvement of conversion to 1,25(OH)2D3, but possibly by interaction with VDR. The experiments were done in serum-free medium, indicating that no DBP was needed for the internalization and that the effects could be due to free 25(OH)D. Therefore, local production of 1alpha-OHase suggests an autocrine/paracrine role in regulating parathyroid function and may mediate, in part, the suppression of PTH by calcium and FGF-23 [25].

A Canadian study concluded that the biological effect of vitamin D on PTH concentration is mainly independent of DBP concentrations [12]. Another North-American study reported that genetic variance in GC significantly contributed to circulating DBP as well as to 25(OH)D [24]. However, both total and free 25(OH)D were correlated inversely with PTH, and this correlation was independent of DBP genotype. This reinforces our hypothesis that free and bioavailable 25(OH)D may be good biomarkers of vitamin D status and action in cells than serum 25(OH)D per se.

One of the limitations of this study is that it was not designed to demonstrate a difference in the concentration of 25(OH)D, DPB, or PTH in the different genotypes. The study derives from a larger study focusing on phosphorus intake and bone outcomes. The sample size was calculated to find a 4 % difference (standard deviation, SD-0.050 g/cm2) in distal radius bone mineral density between the highest and lowest phosphorus intake tertiles.

Other limitation of this study is that the affinity constants of DBP by Arnauld et al. [6] are derived by experimental evidence from one individual’s human serum sample. It has not been investigated whether post-translational modification of Gc may influence affinity for vitamin D metabolites. In addition, the Gc affinity constant for 25(OH)D3 in published literature ranges by several orders of magnitude from 1.9 × 10-10 to 1.5 to 10–8 [1]. It is also known that Gc protein circulates several fold above 25(OH)D concentrations, with only approximately 5 % of circulating Gc protein occupied by vitamin D metabolites.

As we do not have the full protein sequence, we cannot be certain whether we have some of the other Gc-isoforms. According to Arnaud’s analysis, binding affinity of these more rare isoforms may vary as much as 12 fold. Nevertheless, the other isoforms are quite rare. Arnauld’s affinity constants are estimated for 25(OH)D3 and not for 25(OH)D2 but this is not a problem for the interpretation of the results as vitamin D2 is not found in foods and only in a few supplements in Finland as food is fortified with vitamin D3 and most of the supplements are vitamin D3.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that genetic polymorphisms of DBP and free and bioavailable concentrations of 25(OH)D may be of relevance when vitamin D status and vitamin D metabolism are evaluated. Important findings were the relationships between PTH and free and bioavailable 25(OH)D and genetic variation of DBP.

Abbreviations

1,25(OH)2D3, 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; BMI, body mass index; Ca, calcium; CEU population, Northern Europeans from Utah; DBP, Vitamin D binding protein; ELISA assay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FFQ, Food frequency questionnaire; FGF23, Fibroblast growth factor; GC, group specific component; KALB, affinity constant for 25(OH)D with albumin; KDBP, affinity constant for 25(OH)D with vitamin D binding protein; PHOMI- study, Dietary phosphorus and health outcomes study; PTH, parathyroid hormone; SNP, Single nucleotide polymorphism; UVB, Ultraviolet B; VDR, vitamin D receptor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants of the PHOMI study. We also thank technician Anu Heiman-Lindh for performing the DBP concentration measurements as well as assisting in other laboratory analyses.

Funding

This work was supported by the Academy of Finland (grant number 127536), the Doctoral School for Applied Biosciences (ABS), the University of Helsinki Future Fund, the Finnish Cultural Foundation, Alfred Kordelin Foundation and the Liv och Hälsa Foundation.

Availability of data and materials

The unidentified data from this study is available through corresponding author for any interested party with appropriate rationale.

Authors’ contributions

Study design: ES, MP, STI, VK, HK, MK, OM, CLA. Study conduct: ES, MP, STI, VK, HK, MK, CLA. Data collection: ES, MP, STI, VK, HK, MK, CLA. Data analysis: ES and MP. Data interpretation: ES, MP, and CLA. Drafting the manuscript: ES with the help of MP and CLA. Revising manuscript content: ES, MP, STI, VK, HK, MK, OM and CLA. Approving final version of the manuscript: MP, ES, STI, VK, HK, MK, OM and CLA. ES, MP and CLA take responsibility for the integrity of the data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All subjects gave their informed consent to the procedures, which were in accord with the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Helsinki Uusimaa Hospital District Ethics Committees.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Calcium Research Unit, Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki
(2)
Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Folkhälsan Research Center
(3)
Children’s Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki

References

  1. Bikle DD, Gee E, Halloran B, Kowalski MA, Ryzen E, Haddad JG. Assessment of the free fraction of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in serum and its regulation by albumin and the vitamin D-binding protein. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;63:954–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Yamamoto N, Kumashiro R. Conversion of vitamin D3 binding protein (group-specific component) to a macrophage activating factor by the stepwise action of beta-galactosidase of B cells and sialidase of T cells. J Immunol. 1993;151:2794–802.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Yamamoto N, Naraparaju VR, Orchard PJ. Defective lymphocyte glycosidases in the macrophage activation cascade of juvenile osteopetrosis. Blood. 1996;88:1473–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Schneider GB, Benis KA, Flay NW, Ireland RA, Popoff SN. Effects of vitamin D binding protein-macrophage activating factor (DBP-MAF) infusion on bone resorption in two osteopetrotic mutations. Bone. 1995;16:657–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Braun A, Bichlmaier R, Cleve H. Molecular analysis of the gene for the human vitamin-D-binding protein (group-specific component): allelic differences of the common genetic GC types. Hum Genet. 1992;89:401–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnaud J, Constans J. Affinity differences for vitamin D metabolites associated with the genetic isoforms of the human serum carrier protein (DBP). Hum Genet. 1993;92:183–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gozdzik A, Zhu J, Wong BY, Fu L, Cole DE, Parra EJ. Association of vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) polymorphisms and serum 25(OH)D concentrations in a sample of young Canadian adults of different ancestry. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2011;127:405–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mendel CM. The free hormone hypothesis: a physiologically based mathematical model. Endocr Rev. 1989;10:232–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chun RF, Lauridsen AL, Suon L, et al. Vitamin D-binding protein directs monocyte responses to 25-hydroxy- and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:3368–76.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnsen MS, Grimnes G, Figenschau Y, et al. Serum free and bio-available 25-hydroxyvitamin D correlate better with bone density than serum total 25 hydroxyvitamin D. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2014;74:177–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Powe CE, Evans MK, Wenger J, et al. Vitamin D-binding protein and vitamin D status of black Americans and white Americans. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1991–2000.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Dastani Z, Li R, Richards B. Genetic Regulation of Vitamin D Levels. Calcif Tissue Int. 2013;92:106–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sai AJ, Walters RW, Fang X, Gallagher JC. J Relationship between vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, and bone health. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:E436–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Itkonen ST, Karp HJ, Kemi VE, et al. Associations among total and food additive phosphorus intake and carotid intima-media thickness--a cross-sectional study in a middle-aged population in Southern Finland. Nutr J. 2013;12:94.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Outila TA, Kärkkäinen MU, Lamberg-Allardt CJ. Vitamin D status affects serum parathyroid hormone concentrations during winter in female adolescents: associations with forearm bone mineral density. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;74:206–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Nordic Council of Ministers. Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2012. Copenhagen: Nord; 2013. 009.Google Scholar
  17. Lauridsen AL, Vestergaard P, Hermann AP, et al. Plasma concentrations of 25-hydroxy-vitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D are related to the phenotype of Gc (vitamin D-binding protein): a cross-sectional study on 595 early postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int. 2005;77:15–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilson RT, Bortner Jr J, Roff A, et al. Genetic and environmental influences on plasma vitamin D binding protein concentrations. Transl Res. 2015;165:667–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sinotte M, Diorio C, Bérubé S, Pollak M, Brisson J. Genetic polymorphisms of the vitamin D binding protein and plasma concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in premenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:634–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nissen J, Rasmussen LB, Ravn-Haren G, et al. Common variants in CYP2R1 and GC genes predict vitamin D concentrations in healthy Danish children and adults. PLoS One. 2014;9:e89907.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Lauridsen AL, Vestergaard P, Nexo E. Mean serum concentration of vitamin D-binding protein (Gc globulin) is related to the Gc phenotype in women. Clin Chem. 2001;47:753–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bouillon R, Jones K, Schoenmakers I. Vitamin D-binding protein and vitamin D in blacks and whites. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:879.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pekkinen M, Saarnio E, Viljakainen HT, et al. Vitamin D binding protein genotype is associated with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and PTH concentrations, as well as bone health in children and adolescents in Finland. PLoS One. 2014;30(9):e87292. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087292.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Carpenter TO, Zhang JH, Parra E, et al. Vitamin D binding protein is a key determinant of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in infants and toddlers. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28:213–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Ritter CS, Haughey BH, Armbrecht HJ, Brown AJ. Distribution and regulation of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 1α-hydroxylase in human parathyroid glands. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2012;130:73–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement