Skip to main content

Associations of maternal diet and nutritional status with offspring hepatic steatosis in the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children

Abstract

Background

Priming for cardiometabolic diseases, including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is hypothesized to begin in utero. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether there is an association between maternal nutritional status and offspring NAFLD.

Methods

Data come from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) in the UK. The analytic sample included 3353 participants who had maternal information on pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain, diabetes, and free sugar intake as percent of total energy and were assessed for mild-severe hepatic steatosis at 24 years by transient elastography (controlled attenuation parameter score ≥ 248 dB/m). Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between maternal factors and offspring hepatic steatosis at 24 years.

Results

In confounder-adjusted models the independent associations for each maternal factor with mild to severe vs low hepatic steatosis at 24 years were: pre-pregnancy overweight (OR: 1.84, 95%CL: 1.43–2.38) or obesity (OR: 2.73, 95%CL: 1.84–4.03), more than recommended gestational weight gain (OR: 1.30, 95%CL: 1.04–1.64), diabetes (OR: 1.39, 95%CI: 0.87, 2.21), and high free sugar intake during pregnancy (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.33). These associations were largely mediated by BMI at 24 years, but not by birthweight or breastfeeding.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that maternal nutritional status is associated with the development of NAFLD in their adult offspring, although the relationship is largely mediated by offspring BMI in adulthood.

Peer Review reports

Background

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is defined as having excessive hepatic steatosis in the absence of other liver diseases, extreme alcohol intake, or medication-induced steatosis [1]. Established risk factors for NAFLD include increasing age, male sex, high sugar diets, and obesity. In children, the prevalence of NAFLD has increased considerably over recent decades in parallel with the rise of obesity [2]. This is concerning because pediatric NAFLD can progress to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which is characterized by inflammation, as well as cirrhosis and end stage liver disease in adulthood [3]. NAFLD is also associated with increased risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease [4, 5].

The clinical manifestation of NAFLD in children and the presence of steatosis at birth in some newborns suggest that its origins may lie in utero [6,7,8,9]. The Developmental Origins of Health And Disease (DOHAD) paradigm posits that environmental factors during fetal and early life program the risk of metabolic diseases including NAFLD [10, 11]. Currently, the fetal environment primarily occurs in a context of high prevalence of maternal obesity as well as high sugar intake that continues to increase globally [12, 13]. Studies in animal models have shown that maternal diets high in sugar and fat predispose offspring to developing NAFLD phenotypes [14,15,16,17,18,19]. In humans, a maternal diet high in added sugar intake during pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk of obesity in children [20, 21]. While no human studies have directly looked at the association between maternal energy rich diets and offspring NAFLD explicitly, pre-pregnancy obesity and overweight, maternal diabetes, and gestational weight gain have all been associated with increased hepatic fat in infants and adolescents [7, 8, 22,23,24]. There is also evidence that breastfeeding has a protective effect on hepatic steatosis in individuals that were exposed to excess nutrition in utero [22]. However, whether outcomes are dependent on child sex and the impact of childhood factors such as adiposity in mediating the outcome have been inconsistent. It is also not known whether this association extends into adulthood.

The overall aim of this paper is to explore whether the associations between maternal nutritional status and offspring NAFLD extend into adulthood in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), based in the UK. Secondary aims are to determine whether there is sexual dimorphism in these associations and whether the associations are mediated by birthweight, breastfeeding, or BMI at time of outcome.

Methods

Study design & population

We used data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, a population-based birth cohort study that has previously been described in detail [25,26,27]. In summary, ALSPAC enrolled 14,541 pregnant women in the greater Bristol, UK area with expected delivery dates between 1st April 1991 and 31st December 1992. At the age of seven, attempts were made to boost the sample, resulting in a total of 15,454 pregnancies and 14,901 children alive at the age of one year. Clinical, dietary, and demographic information was collected from the mothers starting in pregnancy. When the offspring were 24 years of age, 10,018 participants were invited to a clinic visit known as Focus@24, which included the collection of biological samples and anthropometric measures. Data from the 24-year clinic were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at the University of Bristol [28, 29]. The study website contains details of all the data that are available through a fully searchable data dictionary and variable search tool [30].

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee and the Local Research Ethics Committees. Informed consent for the use of collected data via questionnaires and clinics was obtained from participants following the recommendations of the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee at the time.

Assessment of maternal nutrition

Pre-pregnancy BMI

Pre-pregnancy weight and height were self-reported via postal questionnaire and were used to calculate body mass index (BMI) as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared [31]. We classified BMI according to World Health Organization categories as underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal (18.5 to < 25 kg/m2), overweight (25 to < 30 kg/m2), and obese (≥ 30 kg/m2) [32].

Gestational weight gain (GWG)

Gestational weight and the corresponding gestational age and date were abstracted by trained research midwives from obstetric medical records [33, 34]. As previously described, weight gain was predicted from linear spline models as the difference between predicted weight at time of delivery and weight at gestational age of 0 weeks [33, 34]. Women were then categorized into three categories according to Institute of Medicine (IoM) recommendations: adequate, less than, and more than recommended GWG. Recommended weight gain is 12.5–18 kg for underweight; 11.5–16 kg for normal weight; 7–11.5 kg for overweight; and 5–9 kg for obese women [35].

Maternal diabetes

Due to limited sample size, maternal diabetes was defined as a composite variable that included pre-existing diabetes assessed by self-reported questionnaire at time of recruitment, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and glycosuria (≥ 13.9 mmol/l on at least two occasions during pregnancy) abstracted from medical records, as previously described [24].

Maternal free sugar intake

Maternal intake of 43 food groups was assessed by food frequency questionnaire at 32 weeks gestation. The questionnaire can be found on the study website [36]. This information was combined with nutrient information on standardized portion sizes to calculate macronutrient intakes, as described in detail previously [37]. Non-milk extrinsic sugars (NMES) were calculated by deducting sugars from milk and fruits and vegetables (contained within cellular walls) from total sugars [38]. This is equivalent to the definition of free sugars which includes isolated sugars added during food preparation and manufacturing (added sugars) as well as sugars present in unsweetened fruit juices, fruit concentrates, or honey and other syrups [39]. We calculated the percent of total energy consumed as free sugars by dividing each participant’s estimated non-milk extrinsic sugar intake by total energy intake and categorized it into tertiles (hereafter referred to as percent free sugar).

Assessment of liver outcomes

At 24 years old, participants were assessed by transient elastography for non-invasive quantification of liver steatosis and fibrosis (FibroScan® 502 Touch, Echosens, Paris, France). Individuals with an active medical implant (e.g. pacemaker), liver ascites, or who were pregnant were excluded from the liver scan. Participants were asked to fast overnight or for at least six hours prior to transient elastography [40]. Transient elastography provides a controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) measure of steatosis and a measure of liver stiffness to quantify fibrosis. Manufacturer and machine indications were used to conduct the scan. Ten readings were required for each patient to derive a CAP score and fibrosis result. CAP values outside the 100–400 dB/m range were considered invalid and coded as missing. Median fibrosis results greater than or equal to 15 kPa or with an interquartile range (IQR) to median ratio greater than or equal to 30% were considered invalid and coded as missing.

We categorized participants into two categories of steatosis based on CAP score cut-off values derived from a meta-analysis by Karlas, et al.: low (< 248 dB/m, < 11% steatosis) vs mild to severe (248–400 dB/m, ≥11% steatosis) [41]. In sensitivity analysis we also categorized steatosis as low to moderate steatosis (< 279 dB/m, < 66% steatosis) vs severe steatosis (279–400 dB/m, ≥66% steatosis). We categorized fibrosis into two groups. The first group included those with no fibrosis or portal fibrosis without septa (F0-F1, < 7.9 kPA) and the second group included those with any fibrosis: portal fibrosis, septa, or cirrhosis (F2-F4, > 7.9 kPA) [42].

Covariates

Maternal age at delivery was derived from the mother’s report of her date of birth and the infant’s date of birth. Offspring birthweight and sex were extracted from medical records. We used highest level of maternal education reported during pregnancy as a proxy for socioeconomic status [43]. Mothers self-reported one of five categories: None/CSE (certificate of secondary education), Vocational (vocational courses after 16 years of age), O (ordinary level exams at 16 years), A (optional advanced level exams at 18 years), and University degree and above [44]. Mothers self-reported smoking (1st and 3rd trimester) and alcohol intake (1st, 2nd, and 3rd trimester); we categorized each as none vs any at any time point in pregnancy. Physical activity was assessed via questionnaire in the first trimester and was categorized as at least once per week versus less than weekly. Infant birthweight was abstracted from medical records and we classified it as low (< 2500 g), normal, and high (> 3999 g) [45]. Breastfeeding duration was assessed from maternal reports when the child was 15 months old and categorized as never, less than 3 months, 3 to 6 months, and greater than 6 months. Offspring BMI at 24 years was calculated from height and weight collected by standardized clinic protocols and categorized as described above for the mothers. We defined hazardous alcohol consumption as an Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test for Consumption (AUDIT-C) score greater than or equal to four in women and five in men [46, 47].

Inclusion/exclusion

We included all participants who attended the Focus@24 visit and had valid transient elastography measures. We excluded participants from twin pregnancies and those who were missing all four maternal exposures (pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain, diabetes, and percent free sugars). In models with percent free sugar as the primary exposure, we additionally excluded those with mothers who had pre-existing or gestational diabetes since this could alter their consumption patterns.

Statistical analysis

We conducted statistical analyses in SAS version 9.4 (Cary, NC). We calculated median values and IQR for continuous variables and counts and percentages for categorical variables, for the full sample and stratified by level of hepatic steatosis (low vs mild to severe) at 24 years. Wilcoxon rank sum (equal variance) and Kolmogrov-Smirnov (unequal variance) tests were used to compare differences in continuous variables across hepatic steatosis levels. Chi-squared tests were used to compare differences between categorical variables. All results were interpreted based on the size, direction, and CIs of the effect estimates and not focused on statistical significance [48].

Figure 1 shows a simple conceptual model on which our modeling strategy was based. We assessed each exposure for potential effect modification by sex by including an interaction term between sex and the exposure. If this term was not significant for all exposures, sex was added as a term in the adjusted models. The primary outcome was mild to severe hepatic steatosis. Unadjusted binary logistic regression was conducted for each exposure in the model 1 series: pre-pregnancy BMI, maternal diabetes, gestational weight gain, and percent free sugar intake.

Fig. 1
figure1

Conceptual model relating maternal exposures to mild to severe hepatic steatosis at 24 years in the ALSPAC cohort. 1In models with % free sugars as the primary exposure, those with pre-existing or gestational diabetes were excluded. Total energy intake was also added as a confounder in these models. 2Sex was considered a confounder if the interaction term was not significant at p < 0.05. 3Hazardous alcohol intake, quantified by AUDIT-C score, was adjusted for in sensitivity analysis. Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index, GWG = gestational weight gain, AUDIT-C = alcohol use disorders identification test consumption

In the model 2 series we adjusted for confounders: maternal age, highest level of maternal education, maternal smoking in pregnancy, alcohol intake in pregnancy, and physical activity in pregnancy. Model 2a included pre-pregnancy BMI, maternal diabetes, and gestational weight gain. Model 2b, which focused on percent free sugar exposure, additionally adjusted for total energy intake.

If the association between exposure and steatosis remained after confounder adjustment, we considered the following potential mediators: a) birthweight, b) breastfeeding, and c) offspring BMI at 24 years.

A sensitivity analysis was performed with the primary outcome defined as severe steatosis. In addition, to understand the impact of alcohol consumption, an important predictor of hepatic steatosis, we added hazardous alcohol intake at 24 years as a covariate in the models.

Results

Of the 10,018 ALSPAC participants who were invited to attend the Focus@24+ visit, 3877 (39%) participants had FibroScan® performed. Of these, 3766 (97%) participants had a valid CAP score. After exclusions for twin pregnancies and those missing all four maternal exposures, our sample size was 3353 (86% of those with FibroScan®, Fig. 2). Demographic characteristics of the sample overall and stratified by offspring hepatic steatosis level are presented in Table 1. Approximately 20% of the offspring had hepatic steatosis at 24 years. Among the mothers, 16.7% were overweight or obese pre-pregnancy, less than 4% had diagnosed pre-existing diabetes, gestational diabetes or glycosuria, and over half had greater than recommended gestational weight gain. Those in the lowest tertile of percent free sugar intake had values ranging from 1.3 to 10.4%, middle to 14.3%, and upper tertile to 42.2%. The median maternal age was 29 years (IQR: 26.0, 32.0). Lower maternal education, smoking during pregnancy, and no breastfeeding were more prevalent in the mothers of offspring with steatosis. Most participants were female (62.2%), with male sex more strongly associated with hepatic steatosis. Over a third (37.5%) of participants were overweight or obese at age 24. Only 2.4% had hepatic fibrosis.

Fig. 2
figure2

Data flow chart for ALSPAC cohort analysis. Of the 10,018 ALSPAC participants invited to attend the Focus@24+ visit, 3877 had Fibroscan for hepatic steatosis measure performed. Of these, 3766 had a valid CAP score. After exclusions for twin pregnancies and those missing all four maternal exposures, the final sample size was 3353. 1No consent for liver scan, not eligible, or excluded due to active implant, liver ascites, or pregnancy. Abbreviations: CAP = controlled attenuation parameter

Table 1 Demographic and clinical factors by hepatic steatosisa at 24 years in the ALSPAC cohort (n = 3353)

There was no heterogeneity by sex for any exposure-outcome associations. The results from logistic regression models are presented in Table 2. In both unadjusted and confounder-adjusted analysis, maternal pre-pregnancy overweight (aOR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.43–2.38), obesity (aOR: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.84–4.03) and more than recommended GWG (aOR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.04–1.64) were positively and independently associated with offspring hepatic steatosis. Being in the highest tertile of percent free sugar consumption was not associated with offspring hepatic steatosis as compared to offspring of mothers in the lowest tertile (aOR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.82–1.33).

Table 2 Associations between maternal factors and offspring hepatic steatosisa at 24 years in the ALSPAC cohort

Birthweight (Table 2, column 3a) and breastfeeding (Table 2, column 3b) were not important mediators in the relationship between maternal factors and offspring steatosis. However, these associations were largely attenuated after adjusting for offspring BMI category at 24 years (Table 2, column 3c), indicating that they are largely mediated by offspring adiposity.

In sensitivity analysis, adjusting for hazardous alcohol intake among offspring did not significantly change the associations (Additional file 1, Table S1). The associations between maternal factors and hepatic steatosis were strengthened when we redefined the outcome to severe steatosis, although these associations were also completely mediated by offspring BMI (Additional file 1, Table S2).

Discussion

Maternal pre-pregnancy overweight, obesity, and more than recommended gestational weight gain were positively and independently associated with offspring hepatic steatosis at 24 years in confounder-adjusted models. These associations were fully mediated by offspring BMI at 24 years.

This is the first study to look at whether the associations between maternal nutritional exposures and offspring hepatic steatosis extend into adulthood and also the first to directly explore associations with maternal free sugar intake. Several previous studies have looked at the associations of maternal BMI, diabetes, and gestational weight gain and offspring NAFLD in children and adolescents [22,23,24, 49, 50]. (Additional file 1, Table S3). In the RAINE cohort, which included 1170 adolescents of European descent in Australia, NAFLD was associated with maternal obesity and gestational weight gain but not with maternal diabetes, and associations were stronger in females [23]. Breastfeeding for over 6 months, especially when combined with delayed introduction of infant formula milk, had a protective association with NAFLD in this cohort [22]. Breastfeeding, which may influence NAFLD through the gut microbiome, has also been associated with reduced risk of NASH in children and adolescent [51, 52]. In our study, outcomes were not mediated by breastfeeding duration and we did not see differences by sex, except that males had greater prevalence of hepatic steatosis at age 24 years. It is possible we did not see a similar protective effect of breastfeeding on NAFLD because we were not able to further adjust for exclusive breastfeeding.

In the EPOCH cohort based in the US, maternal pre-pregnancy obesity was strongly associated with adolescent hepatic steatosis quantified by MRI and the association was largely mediated by offspring adiposity at time of outcome [50]. Maternal diabetes was not significantly associated with later NAFLD. In contrast to the other cohorts and our study, in the same ALSPAC cohort, Patel et al., found a strong association between maternal diabetes and offspring hepatic steatosis at 17 years that was not mediated by offspring adiposity or BMI [24]. This difference is likely not due to differences in methodology. In both our study and the Patel study, maternal diabetes was defined consistently. While hepatic steatosis was measured differently, by ultrasound at 17 years and controlled attenuation parameter at 24 years, these methods have similar sensitivity and specificity in detecting hepatic steatosis so we would not expect such a large increase in prevalence of hepatic steatosis due to assessment method alone [53]. Our statistical models were also similar. However, at 17 years a smaller subset of the cohort (n = 1215 of 4253 that attended the 17-year clinic) was screened for hepatic steatosis, so selection bias is possible. Another possibility for this difference in outcomes may be related to the large increase in prevalence of hepatic steatosis as the cohort reached early adulthood. At 17 years, only 2.1% of a sub-sample of participants had hepatic steatosis, and by 24 years, 20% had hepatic steatosis. It is possible that early-onset steatosis has a different etiology/pathophysiology and the associations are attenuated when overall 24-year prevalence of hepatic steatosis is considered. Adulthood hepatic steatosis may be more associated with adiposity. For example, if the development of NAFLD requires obesity (particularly as individuals age), then the attenuation of estimates by adjusting for BMI is what we would expect to find, and the true association is what we derive from models not adjusting for BMI or adiposity. Future studies should explore the changes in hepatic steatosis that occur from birth to adulthood, and specifically in the ALSPAC cohort from adolescence to adulthood.

Several studies have found associations between maternal obesity/GDM and fetal and infant hepatic steatosis (Additional File 1, Table S3) [6,7,8, 54, 55]. Modi et al., found intrahepatocellular lipid (IHCL) content in infants increased with maternal BMI [7]. They did not look at the effect of gestational diabetes due to the small number of affected women in the study sample. Brumbaugh et al., found that infants born to obese mothers with GDM had increased IHCL compared with infants born to normal weight mothers [8]. In both studies, IHCL correlated with maternal pre-pregnancy BMI but not with infant subcutaneous adiposity. In the Feeding Study cohort from Italy, mothers of 1 year old children with bright livers, a sign of hepatic steatosis, had greater gestational weight gain compared to mothers of those without bright livers [55]. Logan, et al., found no association of maternal GDM, with infant IHCL [54]. In that study, the GDM mothers had good glycemic control (55% received metformin and/or insulin treatment resulting in a mean (SD) 5.3% (0.3) HbA1c) and little obesity (median BMI = 24.2, IQR (21.7, 30.3), whereas glycemic status was not known in the other studies. Finally, in a retrospective autopsy study, stillborn fetuses of diabetic mothers had 78.8% hepatic steatosis compared to 16.6% in non-diabetic mothers (p < 0.0001) regardless of maternal BMI. Further studies of mothers with more prevalent and different types of diabetes are needed to determine whether the association of maternal diabetes with offspring NAFLD is independent of maternal obesity. Additionally, hepatic fat measures in longitudinal birth cohorts ranging from infancy and throughout childhood could clarify the question of whether elevated hepatic fat seen in infancy remains throughout childhood and their relation to overall adiposity.

We found no association between high maternal percent free sugar intake in the third trimester and offspring NAFLD. Women in the lowest tertile had intakes less than 10.4% of total energy and those in the highest tertile had intakes ranging from 14.3 to 42%. The WHO recommended cut-off for intake of free sugars is 10% of total daily energy intake [39]. While some studies have found associations between gestational diet and overall offspring adiposity, none have looked specifically at free sugars in relation to a NAFLD outcome. Animal studies have found strong associations between maternal high fat and sugar diets and offspring hepatic steatosis [14, 15, 56]. The complicated nature of human diet makes it difficult to delineate interactions among nutrients. Another complicating factor is that the most sensitive period of fetal development for hepatic steatosis may be prior to the third trimester. The development of the fetal liver begins at four weeks gestation and is susceptible to fundamental changes to its metabolic pathways through epigenetic changes and mitochondrial dysfunction caused by inflammation due to excess nutrients. Maternal diabetes, obesity, and high fat/sugar diets are all characterized by increased delivery of fuels such as free fatty acids to the developing fetus [57]. Specifically, the liver may be utilized as a site for excess lipid storage, especially prior to 28 weeks gestation when subcutaneous fat storage exponentially increases [58]. Future studies should be designed to accurately measure maternal diet and biomarkers throughout pregnancy to elucidate the exact mechanism through which maternal nutrition can prime offspring for later metabolic dysfunction.

Strengths and limitations

This study contains the largest sample size to date of maternal factors and offspring NAFLD and is from a population-based longitudinal cohort study followed from pregnancy to young adulthood. Many potential confounding variables were available in the dataset. We also used a validated and accurate tool for hepatic steatosis measurement in adults (CAP score based on transient elastography) [41]. We also were able to account for alcohol intake among participants. It has previously been reported that no participants had medical conditions or were taking medications that could influence hepatic function leading to greater confidence that our measure of hepatic steatosis is primarily capturing those with NAFLD [24]. While hepatic fibrosis was also measured in this study, we were underpowered to look at this as an outcome due to the small number of individuals with fibrosis.

The results of this study may not be generalizable to other populations due to the homogenous nature of the cohort population. Additionally, there was differential loss to follow-up within the cohort which could lead to selection bias. Females and participants with mothers with higher education were more likely to participate in follow-up visits [59]. Many characteristics, including maternal diet and maternal pre-pregnancy weight, were self-reported and are subject to recall bias and social desirability bias. However, it has been shown in this cohort that maternal self-reported weight had a high correlation (r = 0.95) with the weight measurement obtained at the first antenatal visit [24]. Maternal diet was collected by an FFQ that was not validated nor designed specifically to measure sugar intake. Measurement of maternal diet throughout pregnancy and with a validated FFQ may have led to different results. Because of the small sample sizes, we were not able to distinguish between types of maternal diabetes. Finally, residual confounding, particularly by lifestyle, is possible.

Conclusions

Maternal nutritional factors were positively and independently associated with offspring hepatic steatosis at 24 years, however these associations were completely mediated by offspring BMI at 24 years. Importantly, these are all modifiable risk factors and recommendations can be tailored to high-risk women to improve outcomes. Due to the high prevalence of metabolic conditions in pregnant women and the potential for transgenerational amplification of these diseases, further prospective study is needed to better understand the developmental origins of NAFLD and other metabolic conditions [13, 60].

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of ALSPAC. Researchers can apply to ALSPAC for use of the data. The study website (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/our-data/) contains details of all the data that are available through a fully searchable data dictionary and variable search tool.

Abbreviations

ALSPAC:

Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

NAFLD:

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

NASH:

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

CAP:

Controlled attenuation parameter

BMI:

Body mass index

GWG:

Gestational weight gain

AUDIT-C:

Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test for Consumption

IQR:

Interquartile range

CL:

Confidence limits

References

  1. 1.

    Vos MB, Abrams SH, Barlow SE, Caprio S, Daniels SR, Kohli R, et al. NASPGHAN clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children: recommendations from the expert committee on NAFLD (ECON) and the north American Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and nutrition (NASPGHAN). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;64(2):319–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000001482.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Welsh JA, Karpen S, Vos MB. Increasing Prevalence of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Among United States Adolescents, 1988–1994 to 2007–2010. J Pediatr. 2013;162(3):496–500 e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Feldstein AE, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Treeprasertsuk S, Benson JT, Enders FB, Angulo P. The natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children: a follow-up study for up to 20 years. Gut. 2009;58(11):1538–44. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2008.171280.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Vernon G, Baranova A, Younossi Z. Systematic review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34(3):274–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04724.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hagström H, Höijer J, Ludvigsson JF, Bottai M, Ekbom A, Hultcrantz R, et al. Adverse outcomes of pregnancy in women with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int. 2016;36(2):268–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.12902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Patel KR, White FV, Deutsch GH. Hepatic steatosis is prevalent in stillborns delivered to women with diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;60(2):152–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000000520.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Modi N, Murgasova D, Ruager-Martin R, Thomas EL, Hyde MJ, Gale C, et al. The influence of maternal body mass index on infant adiposity and hepatic lipid content. Pediatr Res. 2011;70(3):287–91. https://doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e318225f9b1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Brumbaugh DE, Tearse P, Cree-Green M, Fenton LZ, Brown M, Scherzinger A, et al. Intrahepatic Fat is Increased in Neonatal Offspring of Obese Women with Gestational Diabetes. J Pediatr. 2013;162(5):930–6 e1.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bleeker JC, Visser G, Wijburg FA, Ferdinandusse S, Waterham HR, Nikkels PG. Severe fat accumulation in multiple organs in pediatric autopsies: an uncommon but significant finding. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2017;20(4):269–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1093526617691708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hanson M, Gluckman P. Developmental origins of noncommunicable disease: population and public health implications. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(6 Suppl):1754s–8s.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Li M, Reynolds CM, Segovia SA, Gray C, Vickers MH. Developmental programming of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the effect of early life nutrition on susceptibility and disease severity in later life. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:437107.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cioffi CE, Figueroa J, Welsh JA. Added Sugar Intake among Pregnant Women in the United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2012. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(5):886–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2017.10.021.

  13. 13.

    Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010. Jama. 2012;307(5):491–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhang ZY, Dai YB, Wang HN, Wang MW. Supplementation of the maternal diet during pregnancy with chocolate and fructose interacts with the high-fat diet of the young to facilitate the onset of metabolic disorders in rat offspring. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2013;40(9):652–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1681.12147.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kjærgaard M, Nilsson C, Rosendal A, Nielsen MO, Raun K. Maternal chocolate and sucrose soft drink intake induces hepatic steatosis in rat offspring associated with altered lipid gene expression profile. Acta Physiol. 2014;210(1):142–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.12138.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Gregorio BM, Souza-Mello V, Carvalho JJ, Mandarim-de-Lacerda CA, Aguila MB. Maternal high-fat intake predisposes nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in C57BL/6 offspring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(5):495 e1-. e8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kruse M, Seki Y, Vuguin PM, Du XQ, Fiallo A, Glenn AS, et al. High-fat intake during pregnancy and lactation exacerbates high-fat diet-induced complications in male offspring in mice. Endocrinology. 2013;154(10):3565–76. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2012-1877.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Elahi MM, Cagampang FR, Mukhtar D, Anthony FW, Ohri SK, Hanson MA. Long-term maternal high-fat feeding from weaning through pregnancy and lactation predisposes offspring to hypertension, raised plasma lipids and fatty liver in mice. Br J Nutr. 2009;102(4):514–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711450820749X.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Thorn SR, Baquero KC, Newsom SA, El Kasmi KC, Bergman BC, Shulman GI, et al. Early life exposure to maternal insulin resistance has persistent effects on hepatic NAFLD in juvenile non-human primates. Diabetes. 2014; 63(8): 2702–13. https://doi.org/10.2337/db14-0276

  20. 20.

    Murrin C, Shrivastava A, Kelleher CC. Maternal macronutrient intake during pregnancy and 5 years postpartum and associations with child weight status aged five. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67(6):670–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.76.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gillman MW, Rifas-Shiman SL, Fernandez-Barres S, Kleinman K, Taveras EM, Oken E. Beverage Intake During Pregnancy and Childhood Adiposity. Pediatrics. 2017;140(2):e20170031. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-0031.

  22. 22.

    Ayonrinde OT, Oddy WH, Adams LA, Mori TA, Beilin LJ, de Klerk N, et al. Infant nutrition and maternal obesity influence the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in adolescents. J Hepatol. 2017;67(3):568–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ayonrinde OT, Adams LA, Mori TA, Beilin LJ, de Klerk N, Pennell CE, et al. Sex differences between parental pregnancy characteristics and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in adolescents. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 2018;67(1):108–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Patel S, Lawlor DA, Callaway M, Macdonald-Wallis C, Sattar N, Fraser A. Association of maternal diabetes/glycosuria and pre-pregnancy body mass index with offspring indicators of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. BMC Pediatr. 2016;16(1):47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0585-y.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Boyd A, Golding J, Macleod J, Lawlor DA, Fraser A, Henderson J, et al. Cohort profile: the ‘children of the 90s’—the index offspring of the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(1):111–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Fraser A, Macdonald-Wallis C, Tilling K, Boyd A, Golding J, Davey Smith G, et al. Cohort profile: the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children: ALSPAC mothers cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;42(1):97–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys066.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Northstone K, Lewcock M, Groom A, Boyd A, Macleod J, Timpson N, et al. The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC): an update on the enrolled sample of index children in 2019. Wellcome Open Res. 2019;4(51). https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15132.1

  28. 28.

    Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O'Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    University of Bristol. Explore data and samples [Available from: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/our-data/]. Accessed 31 March 2021.

  31. 31.

    North American Association for the Study of Obesity, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Obesity Education Initiative. The practical guide: identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NHLBI Obesity Education Initiative, North American Association for the Study of Obesity; 2000.

  32. 32.

    World Health Organization. Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation on obesity. Geneva: WHO; 1997. p. 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Fraser A, Tilling K, Macdonald-Wallis C, Sattar N, Brion M-J, Benfield L, et al. Association of maternal weight gain in pregnancy with offspring obesity and metabolic and vascular traits in childhood. Circulation. 2010;121(23):2557–64. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.906081.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Macdonald-Wallis C, Lawlor DA, Palmer T, Tilling K. Multivariate multilevel spline models for parallel growth processes: application to weight and mean arterial pressure in pregnancy. Stat Med. 2012;31(26):3147–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5385.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Institute of Medicine. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. Washington DC: The National Academy Press; 2009. p. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Questionnaires University of Bristol Web site [http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/our-data/questionnaires/]. Accessed 31 March 2021.

  37. 37.

    Rogers I, Emmett P. Diet during pregnancy in a population of pregnant women in south West England. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998;52(4):246–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600543.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Emmett PM, Jones LR. Diet, growth, and obesity development throughout childhood in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Nutr Rev. 2015;73(suppl_3):175–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    World Health Organization. Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children: World Health Organization; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Prati D, Taioli E, Zanella A, Della Torre E, Butelli S, Del Vecchio E, et al. Updated definitions of healthy ranges for serum alanine aminotransferase levels. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-137-1-200207020-00006.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Karlas TP, David, Sasso M, Fan J-G, Mi Y-Q, de Lédinghen V, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) technology for assessing steatosis. J Hepatol. 2017;66(5):1022–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2016.12.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wong VWS, Vergniol J, Wong GLH, Foucher J, Chan HLY, Le Bail B, et al. Diagnosis of fibrosis and cirrhosis using liver stiffness measurement in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 2010;51(2):454–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bigornia SJ, LaValley MP, Noel SE, Moore LL, Ness AR, Newby PK. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and central and total adiposity in older children: a prospective study accounting for dietary reporting errors. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(7):1155–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980014001700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Howe LD, Tilling K, Galobardes B, Smith GD, Ness AR, Lawlor DA. Socioeconomic disparities in trajectories of adiposity across childhood. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6(sup3):e144–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems: instruction manual: World Health Organization; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®): American Psychiatric Pub; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Kriston L, Hölzel L, Weiser A-K, Berner MM, Härter M. Meta-analysis: are 3 questions enough to detect unhealthy alcohol use? Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(12):879–88. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Sterne JA, Smith GD. Sifting the evidence—what's wrong with significance tests? Phys Ther. 2001;81(8):1464–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/81.8.1464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Santos S, Monnereau C, Felix JF, Duijts L, Gaillard R, Jaddoe VW. Maternal body mass index, gestational weight gain, and childhood abdominal, pericardial, and liver fat assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Obes. 2019;43(3):581–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-018-0186-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Bellatorre A, Scherzinger A, Stamm E, Martinez M, Ringham B, Dabelea D. Fetal Overnutrition and Adolescent Hepatic Fat Fraction: The Exploring Perinatal Outcomes in Children Study. J Pediatr. 2018;192:165–70 e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Nobili V, Bedogni G, Alisi A, Pietrobattista A, Alterio A, Tiribelli C, et al. A protective effect of breastfeeding on the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94(10):801–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2009.159566.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Del Chierico F, Nobili V, Vernocchi P, Russo A, De Stefanis C, Gnani D, et al. Gut microbiota profiling of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and obese patients unveiled by an integrated meta-omics-based approach. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 2017;65(2):451–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Sasso M, Miette V, Sandrin L, Beaugrand M. The controlled attenuation parameter (CAP): a novel tool for the non-invasive evaluation of steatosis using Fibroscan®. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2012;36(1):13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2011.08.001.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Logan KM, Emsley RJ, Jeffries S, Andrzejewska I, Hyde MJ, Gale C, et al. Development of early adiposity in infants of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(6):1045–51. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-0030.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Bedogni G, De Matteis G, Fabrizi M, Alisi A, Crudele A, Pizzolante F, et al. Association of Bright Liver with the PNPLA3 I148M gene variant in 1-year-old toddlers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(6):2163–70. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-01998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Easton ZJ, Regnault TR. The impact of maternal body composition and dietary fat consumption upon placental lipid processing and offspring metabolic health. Nutrients. 2020;12(10):3031. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12103031.

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Barbour LA, Hernandez TL. Maternal non-glycemic contributors to fetal growth in obesity and gestational diabetes: spotlight on lipids. Curr Diabetes Rep. 2018;18(6):37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-018-1008-2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Ugalde-Nicalo PA, Schwimmer JB. On the origin of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;60(2):147–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000000618.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Sekkarie A, Welsh JA, Northstone K, Cioffi CE, Stein AD, Figueroa J, et al. ALT trends through childhood and adolescence associated with hepatic Steatosis at 24 years: a population-based UK cohort study. Children. 2020;7(9):117. https://doi.org/10.3390/children7090117.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Barbour LA. Changing perspectives in pre-existing diabetes and obesity in pregnancy: maternal and infant short-and long-term outcomes. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obesity. 2014;21(4):257–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/MED.0000000000000079.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are extremely grateful to all the families who took part in this study, the midwives for their help in recruiting them, and the whole ALSPAC team, which includes interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, managers, receptionists and nurses.

We are also grateful to Dr. Andrea J Sharma and Ms. Louise Jones for their advice on this manuscript.

Funding

The UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (Grant ref.: 217065/Z/19/Z) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. This publication is the work of the authors, who serve as guarantors for the contents of this paper. A comprehensive list of grants funding is available on the ALSPAC website (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf); This research was specifically funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) (MR/L022206/1, G0801456).

Support for procurement of the data was provided by Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, GA, USA. The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author has full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed the conceptualization and design of the work. AS was additionally responsible for the data acquisition, analysis, interpretation, and drafting of this work. JAW and KN contributed to the supervision, data acquisition, interpretation, and revision of the draft. ADS and UR contributed to the supervision, interpretation and revision of the draft. MBV contributed to the supervision and revision of the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahlia Sekkarie.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee and the data from the 24 Year Clinic was approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee South West—Frenchay: 14/SW/1173 ALSPAC Focus at 24 + (24 February 2015, confirmed 20 March 2015). Informed consent for the use of collected data via questionnaires and clinics was obtained from participants following the recommendations of the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee at the time.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

A.S., J.A.W, K.N., A.D.S, and U.R. declare that they have no competing interests. M.B.V. reports personal fees from Intercept, grants from Immuron, grants and personal fees from Target Pharmasolutions, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees from Prosciento, and personal fees from Novo Nordisk during the conduct of the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1

. Adjusted associations between maternal factors and 24-year hepatic steatosis, also adjusting for hazardous alcohol intake. Table S2. Associations between maternal factors and offspring severe hepatic steatosis at 24 years in the ALSPAC cohort. Table S3. Summary of literature associating maternal nutrition with offspring hepatic steatosis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sekkarie, A., Welsh, J.A., Northstone, K. et al. Associations of maternal diet and nutritional status with offspring hepatic steatosis in the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children. BMC Nutr 7, 28 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-021-00433-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • NAFLD
  • Obesity
  • Pregnancy
  • Diabetes
  • Longitudinal
  • ALSPAC