Skip to main content
Download PDF

Adherence to dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) diet in relation to psychological function in recovered COVID-19 patients: a case–control study

BMC Nutrition volume 8, Article number: 130 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Follow-up of patients after recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and identifying the adverse effects of the disease in other organs is necessary. Psychiatric symptoms can persist after patients recover from the infection.

Aim

We aimed to examine the adherence to the dietary approach to stop hypertension (DASH) diet in relation to psychological function in individuals who have recovered from COVID-19.

Method

This case–control study was conducted on 246 eligible adults (123 cases and 123 controls). A valid and reliable food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to determine dietary intake. Depression, anxiety and stress, insomnia, sleep quality, and quality of life of participants were evaluated using DASS, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and SF-36 questionnaires, respectively.

Results

There was a significant inverse correlation between total depression score with vegetables, depression, anxiety, and stress score and dietary intake of nuts, legumes, and whole grains (p < 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between stress scores and the intake of red and processed meat (P < 0.05). In multivariate-adjusted regression model, a significant association was found between adherence to DASH diet and depression and stress only in case group (OR = 0.7863, 95% CI 0.746–0.997, p = 0.046 and OR = 0.876, 95% CI 0.771–0.995, p = 0.042, respectively).

Conclusion

Adherence to a DASH diet might be associated with depression and stress reduction in recovered COVID-19 patients.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) appears to have originated in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, in December 2019 and resulted in a disease that was later called Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) by the World Health Organization (WHO) [1]. SARS-CoV-2 infection may cause severe systemic disease that affects several organ systems, particularly the lungs. COVID-19 may be accompanied with long term conditions even after recovery (Long COVID). Hence, it is necessary to follow up on patients suffering from COVID-19 after recovery and identify the adverse effects of the disease in other organs [2].

Recovered covid-19 patients describe diverse symptoms such as fatigue, fever, and cough after hospitalization. Due to multi-organ impairments caused by the infection, possible psychological damage also needs to be considered [2]. It has been reported that COVID-19 patients experienced cognitive deficits after infection, including memory loss, loss of concentration, insomnia, depression, and anxiety [2]. These symptoms can persist after recovery from COVID-19. Impaired mental health affects the quality of life (QoL) [3]. Therefore, psychological impairment is an important concern in COVID-19 patients and should be considered during hospitalization and recovery. Based on a recent study, 35% of COVID-19 patients had moderate to severe psychological symptoms [4]. Likewise, in another research, 19% of COVID-19 patients had clinically significant symptoms of depression and 10.4% had mild to severe symptoms of anxiety after hospital discharge [5]. Khademi et al. revealed that the prevalence of anxiety and depression in recovered COVID-19 patients was 5.8% and 5.0%, respectively [6].

The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet was developed to reduce the prevalence of hypertension [7]. DASH diet is characterized by high intake of vegetables, whole grains, fruits, nuts, and leguminous and low consumption of red meat, low-fat dairy, desserts, sugary beverages and sweets [7]. Several investigations have shown that the DASH diet has beneficial effects on cardiovascular and renal disease [8, 9]. Few studies have been performed to assess the effects of the DASH diet on mood disorders [10]. Nevertheless, two studies have indicated that DASH diet improves depression score [11, 12]. Also, one investigation has shown that DASH diet improves mood disorders in women after menopause [13]. The relationship between dietary patterns and COVID-19 outcomes have been evaluated in previous studies but to the best of our knowledge, this relationship has not yet been evaluated among long COVID patients [14,15,16,17]. Psychological impairments are crucial concerns during hospitalization and recovery in COVID-19 patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between compliance with DASH diet and psychological function in recovered covid-19 patients.

Methods

Study design

The current case–control study was conducted on adults aged ≥ 30 years who referred to the clinic of Qaem Hospital, Mashhad, Iran, from November 2020 to January 2021. All cases of COVID-19 in the past 1 month who had negative PCR test or CT scan at the time of interview were included in the study as case group. The exclusion criteria for case group were: receiving anti-depressant treatment during the previous six months, hepatic or renal failure, autoimmune diseases, cancer, metabolic bone disease, and having special dietary habits, such as vegetarian diet.

The control group was then selected randomly among adults > 30 years without a history of COVID-19 who were referred to the nutrition clinic of the Qaem Hospital. The exclusion criteria for controls were history of COVID-19 based on PCR or CT scan, receiving anti-depressant treatment during the previous six months, metabolic bone disease, hepatic or renal failure, autoimmune diseases, cancer, and having special dietary habits. One control was enrolled for each case and the case and control groups were matched based on gender and age (± 5 years). Due to the difficulties in recruiting controls during the study period (first and second peaks of COVID-19), and considering the consecutive patient requitement, controls were only matched based on age and gender with the case group. Furthermore, researchers were instructed to reduce the interview time in order to reduce the duration of possible COVID-19 exposure in the clinic. Therefore, only main demographic data including age, gender, and education level were collected in the study.

Of the 246 eligible individuals who participated in the present study, a total of 240 participants (120 controls and 120 cases) were included in the final analysis. Two cases and four controls were excluded from the study because their mean energy intakes were outside ± 3 SD. All participants provided informed written consent, and all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations or the declaration of Helsinki.

General and anthropometric characteristics

Anthropometric and demographic characteristics, including age, education level, weight, and height, were collected by a trained nurse. A calibrated personal scale was used for weight measurement. To determine height, fixed measuring tape on the wall was used. The following formula was applied for calculating body mass index: body weight (kg)/(body height (m))2.

Dietary assessment

A 68-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to evaluate the food intake of subjects. The validity and reliability of the FFQ has been approved in a previous study [18]. The FFQ was filled during face-to-face interviews. To calculate nutrient and energy intakes, the portion sizes in FFQ were converted to grams and were analyzed by nutritionist IV software (N-Squared Computing, Cincinnati, OH, USA). The intake of the nutrients was adjusted based on energy intake as intakes/ 1000 kcal. A DASH score was calculated based on the method proposed by Fung et al. [19]. The components of DASH score consisted of 8 items including Fruit, Vegetable, Nuts and legumes Whole grains, Red and processed meat, Low fat dairy product, Sweetened beverage and Sodium. DASH score provides a scale to identify high intake of vegetables, legumes and nuts, fruits, whole grains and low-fat dairies based on quintile classification (highest quintile is considered as 5 points and lowest quintile is considered as 1 point). Individuals with lower quintile of sodium intake, red and processed meats as well as sweetened beverages receive higher points. Eventually, the total component scores were combined to obtain the general DASH score that ranged between 8 and 40 points.

Depression anxiety stress scales (DASS)

The depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) is a questionnaire on mood status [20]. DASS-21 is an accurate and valid tool that consists of 21 items. Each question is rated on a four-point Likert scale (0–3) to recognize the severity of stress, anxiety, and depression. The score of each sub-class should be doubled in order to be comparable with the scores of the main questionnaire that is composed of 42 items (DASS-42). Lower DASS scores demonstrate lower degrees of negative emotions. The reliability and validity of DASS have been previously reported in the Iranian population [21]. The scores for stress, anxiety, and depression were allocated into two categories: No or minimal disorder; and some degree of mood disorder. The scores obtained from each subscale were determined as follows: in depression subscale, scores ≤ 9 indicated no depression and scores higher than 9 indicated some degree of depression, in anxiety subscale scores ≤ 7 indicated no anxiety and scores higher than 7 indicated some degree of anxiety, and in stress subscale scores ≤ 14 indicated no anxiety and scores higher than 14 indicated some degree of stress.

Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)

The insomnia severity index (ISI) is a seven-item self-report questionnaire for assessing insomnia symptom and their consequences. ISI dimensions include anxiety-associated sleeping disturbance, satisfaction with the present sleep pattern, and sleep disorder intensity [22]. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 to 4. The overall ISI score ranges from 0 to 28. Categories of insomnia are defined based on ISI scores as follows: no insomnia (0–7) and mild to severe insomnia (8–28). In this study, we used the validated and reliable Persian version of ISI for the Iranian population (Cronbach's alpha > 0.8 and intra-class correlation coefficient > 0.7) [23].

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

PSQI questionnaire is a 19-item self-reported tool to evaluate sleep quality over the past 30 days [24]. This questionnaire contains 7 component scores, including daytime dysfunction, use of sleep medication, sleep disturbances, habitual sleep efficiency, subjective sleep quality, sleep duration, and sleep latency. The answers are scored on a 3-point scale (0–3). Therefore, the total PSQI score ranges from 0 to 21. Patients were categorized into two groups according to their PSQI score: the poor-sleeper group (PSQI > 5) and the good-sleeper group (PSQI ≤ 5). Farrahi Moghaddam et al. validated the Persian version of PSQI in 2012 [25].

Quality of Life Questionnaire

The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used as a reliable tool for assessing the general quality of life. Scores on this questionnaire range from 0 to 100. validity and reliability of the Persian version of SF-36 were evaluated in a previous study [26].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was run by SPSS Statistics for Windows v20 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to analysis the normality of variables. Normally distributed variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD), and non-normally distributed variables were expressed as the median and interquartile range (IQR). Also, frequency and percentage were demonstrated for categorical variables. Chi-square test and independent sample t-test were applied for comparing variables between case and control groups, respectively. To compare dietary intakes between case and control as well as tertiles of DASH diet, a Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) test was used. Finally, multinomial logistic regression was performed to evaluate the relationship between tertiles of DASH diet and DASS-21 subscale scores. Various models were designed with study variables as confounders. The best model based on model fit, power and sensitivity analysis was presented in the results. For all analyses p value of < , 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Demographic and anthropometric characteristics of the population

Anthropometric and demographic parameters of the subjects in case and control groups are presented in Table 1. The mean ± SD age of the case group was 60.38 ± 13.61 years, of which 57.5% were male. There were no significant differences in age, gender, weight, and BMI between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference in height and educational level between groups (p < 0.05).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants between groups
Full size table

Comparison of diet and psychological function between groups

Table 2 shows the comparison of the mean dietary intake of subjects in tertiles of adherence to the DASH-diet style between case and control groups. There was a significant difference in protein and vegetable intakes between case and control groups (p = 0.003, 0.016, respectively). Regarding components of DASH diet, there were significant differences between intakes of nuts and legumes, fruit and whole grain, and tertiles of DASH diet between groups (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in red and processed meat, low-fat dairy product, and protein intakes between tertiles of DASH diet (p < 0.05).

Table 2 Energy-adjusted of dietary intakes between groups
Full size table

Comparison of psychological scores and tertile of DASH diet between case and control groups is presented in Fig. 1. There was a significant difference in QoL of first, second and third tertiles of DASH between case and control groups (p < 0.001). Also, there was a significant difference in anxiety in first, second and third tertiles of DASH between the case and control groups (p = 0.008, p = 0.015, p = 0.019, respectively). There was a significant difference in the stress of third tertiles of DASH between the case and control groups (p = 0.012).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparison between DASH tertiles and psychological faction in case and control group

Full size image

As observed in Table 3, There was a significant inverse correlation between total depression scores and the intake of vegetables (r =  − 0.290; P < 0.05) and between depression, anxiety, and stress scores and the intake of nuts, legumes (r =  − 0.224; P < 0.05, r =  − 0.280; P < 0.05, r =  − 0.237; P < 0.05 respectively) and whole grains (r =  − 0.224; P < 0.05, r =  − 0.359; P < 0.05, r =  − 0.283; P < 0.05 respectively). A significant positive correlation was seen between stress and the intake of red and processed meat (r = 0.231; P < 0.05).

Table 3 Correlation coefficient between psychological tests and components of DASH diet in case and control group
Full size table

Association between psychological function and DASH diet

In multinomial logistic regression analyses, the first tertile of DASH diet in each group was served as reference. Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios for psychological function across tertiles of DASH diet are presented in crude and adjusted models in Table 4. In the adjusted model, the odds ratio was adjusted for energy intake, age, sex, and educational levels. Only in case group, adherence to DASH diet was significantly associated with depression and stress in the adjusted model (OR = 0.7863, 95% CI 0.746–0.997, P-value = 0.046; OR = 0.876, 95% CI 0.771–0.995, p-value = 0.042, respectively).

Table 4 Multiple-adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between tertiles of DASH style
Full size table

Discussion

In this study, we found that high adherence to a DASH-type diet, with high consumption of vegetables, fruits, seeds, legumes, and nuts as well as low consumption of sodium, red and processed meats, was associated with lower odds of depression and stress in recovered COVID-19 patient.

Although the association between dietary styles and mental well-being is unclear, it is possible that mental health is related to dietary habits. Previous studies have recommended the intake of fruit and vegetables and whole-grains in COVID-19 [27, 28]. Nutrition institutes from Spain and Italy have recommended to include at least five servings of vegetables and fruits daily in the diet of patients with COVID-19 [27]. Vegetables and fruits contain a high amount of minerals and vitamins that are important in the modulation of the immune system. Also, vegetables and fruits contain various antioxidants, water, and fiber. All of these nutrients play an important role in the control of diabetes, hypertension, and weight gain, which increase the severity of COVID-19 [29]. As well, COVID-19 patients had mood disorders, including depression and anxiety [2]. In line with our results, Valipour et al. conducted a study on 3846 individuals using of 106-item FFQ in Isfahan province in 2010 and reported that moderate adherence to DASH-style diet was related to lower odds of depression in adult population but this relationship was not significant among obese, overweight, and male adults [11]. Also, high adherence to DASH diet was reported to be inversely correlated with anxiety in normal-weight adults in another study [7]. Faghih et al. performed a study on 240 Iranian university students using 168-item FFQ containing and reported that greater adherence to DASH dietary pattern, characterized by high intake of vegetables and fruits, nuts, seeds and legumes, low-fat dairy products, and whole grains, was significantly correlated to psychological well-being and remarkably decreased depression, anxiety, and stress scores [30]. Based on clinical evidence, gastrointestinal microbiota contribute to communication between the gastrointestinal and brain and play a role in behavior and mood disorders. In addition, the quality of diet also affects the gastrointestinal microbiota, which is associated with stress, depression, and anxiety [31].

Diet and lifestyle improvement may play an important role in the symptoms of mood disorder. We found that depression scores were inversely correlated with the intake of vegetables among recovered COVID-19 patients, which is similar to previous studies [32, 33]. A meta-analysis consisting of 18 investigations and 446,551 participants has reported that vegetable intake is inversely correlated to the risk of depression [32]. In addition, a cohort study indicated that regular and frequent consumption of vegetables and fruits may play an important role in decreasing the risk of depression in elderly persons [33]. Other studies have reported that a high intake of snacks and fatty foods and low consumption of vegetables and fruits was associated with increased severity of stress in children [34]. A systematic review reported that high consumption of vegetables might reduce depressive symptoms and promote higher levels of self-efficacy [35]. Although the mechanisms by which vegetables or healthy dietary style reduce the risk of depressive behavior is not entirely clear [33], some of the nutrients, including antioxidants, n-3 fatty acids, and B complex vitamins, possibly be associated with mood disorders [36]. Inflammation and oxidative stress can influence autonomic nervous system neurons that consequently increase depressive symptoms. B complex vitamins have a beneficial effect on oxidative stress and inflammation and are crucial for the function of neurons [37]. Therefore, deficiency in these nutrients is related to depression and anxiety [37]. Another possible mechanism for improving depressive symptoms is phytochemical ingredients in vegetables and fruits, which have antioxidant activity [33].

Results of the present study indicated that the intake of nuts, seeds, and legumes was associated with reduced prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress scores among recovered COVID-19 patients. Our findings were in line with the results of previous investigations [38]. Nuts, seeds, and legumes contain a remarkable amount of macro- and micro-nutrients, polyphenol antioxidants, and beneficial bioactive ingredients that their deficiency leads to inflammation and oxidative stress, consequently promoting psychological distress and decreasing quality of life [39]. We found an inverse association between whole grains intake and depression, anxiety, and stress among recovered COVID-19 subjects. Similar to our results, Sangouni et al. showed that higher intake of whole grains was associated with reduced odds of depression [40]. Also, a study conducted on 3172 adult subjects with the age range of 18–55 years revealed that moderate whole grain consumption was inversely correlated with anxiety in females [41]. In contrast to our results, some studies showed no significant effect for whole grains on mood disorders [42, 43]. It has been shown that the consumption of whole grains reduces insulin resistance, which is related to psychological disorders such as anxiety and depression. Moreover, whole grains contain B-vitamins, which play an important role in neuronal function [41, 44].

Also, we found stress scores were positively correlated with the intake of red and processed meat among recovered COVID-19 patients. Some research has evaluated food choices after stressful events [45, 46]. Uemura et al. determined food group intake after the Earthquake in eastern Japan in 2011 and revealed that people with higher stress had worse diet quality, i.e., less intake of vegetables, fruits, and soy as well as a high intake of meat [46]. Also, after the spring of 2020, some studies were conducted on food choices after the COVID-19 lockdown. For instance, a Polish survey showed decreased consumption of fruits and vegetables and increased intake of dairy and meat [47]. On the other hand, earlier studies have also suggested a positive relationship between high intakes of red and processed meat and increased risk of stress [48, 49]. Overall, these results showed that dietary intakes might influence the risk of stress, and thus, future large-scale research is required to evaluate the dietary determinants of stress.

To the best of our knowledge, this study was the first study examining the correlation between psychological functions and adherence to DASH diet among recovered COVID-19 patients. Despite the strengths of this study (e.g., population-based study), some limitations should be considered. We did not measure physical activity in our subjects. Due to the movement restriction act in the country, it was hypothesized that the level of physical activity during the past one moth was affected by the restriction in outdoor activities and was similar in both the case and control groups. In our study we used a 68-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to evaluate food intake and diet status of subjects. As FFQ is memory-based and due to the presence of COVID-19, there is a possibility of recall bias due to forgetfulness caused by the mental stress or complications of the disease and medications. Another limitation of this study was that we did not evaluate psychological history of the patients before COVID-19. Therefore, it is possible that patients with undiagnosed mental disorders were included in the study and affected the findings. However, due to the specific condition in the hospitals at the time of conducting the study, referring patients to psychologist or obtaining medical records were not possible due to the workload of the hospitals and the reduced number of functional clinics in the city.

Conclusion

Our study showed that adherence to DASH- style diet was significantly association with depression and stress in recovered COVID-19 patients. This finding suggests that adherence to DASH-style diet can reduce depressive symptoms and mental impairments. Further longitudinal large-scale studies are necessary to establish these results.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets collected and/or analyzed during the present study are not publicly accessible due to ethical concerns but corresponding author may provide datasets upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

DASH:

Dietary approaches to stop hypertension

FFQ:

Food frequency questionnaire

ISI:

Insomnia Severity Index

PSQI:

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

SARS-CoV-2:

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

QoL:

Quality of life

DASS:

Depression anxiety stress scales

References

  1. Lai CC, Shih TP, Ko WC, Tang HJ, Hsueh PR. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55(3):105924.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Balachandar V, Mahalaxmi I, Subramaniam M, Kaavya J, Kumar NS, Laldinmawii G, et al. Follow-up studies in COVID-19 recovered patients-is it mandatory? Sci Total Environ. 2020;729: 139021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rogers JP, Chesney E, Oliver D, Pollak TA, McGuire P, Fusar-Poli P, et al. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(7):611–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Li H, Xue Q, Xu X. Involvement of the nervous system in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Neurotox Res. 2020;38(1):1–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu D, Baumeister RF, Veilleux JC, Chen C, Liu W, Yue Y, et al. Risk factors associated with mental illness in hospital discharged patients infected with COVID-19 in Wuhan. China Psychiatry research. 2020;292: 113297.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Khademi M, Vaziri-Harami R, Shams J. Prevalence of mental health problems and its associated factors among recovered COVID-19 Patients during the pandemic: a single-center study. Front Psych. 2021;12:403.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, Appel LJ, Bray GA, Harsha D, et al. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(1):3–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Azadbakht L, Fard NRP, Karimi M, Baghaei MH, Surkan PJ, Rahimi M, et al. Effects of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) eating plan on cardiovascular risks among type 2 diabetic patients: a randomized crossover clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(1):55–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rebholz CM, Crews DC, Grams ME, Steffen LM, Levey AS, Miller ER III, et al. DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) diet and risk of subsequent kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68(6):853–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Saharkhiz M, Khorasanchi Z, Karbasi S, Jafari-Nozad AM, Naseri M, Mohammadifard M, et al. The association between adherence to a dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) diet and neuro-psychological function in young women. BMC nutrition. 2021;7(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Valipour G, Esmaillzadeh A, Azadbakht L, Afshar H, Hassanzadeh A, Adibi P. Adherence to the DASH diet in relation to psychological profile of Iranian adults. Eur J Nutr. 2017;56(1):309–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khayyatzadeh SS, Mehramiz M, Mirmousavi SJ, Mazidi M, Ziaee A, Kazemi-Bajestani SMR, et al. Adherence to a Dash-style diet in relation to depression and aggression in adolescent girls. Psychiatry Res. 2018;259:104–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Torres SJ, Nowson CA. A moderate-sodium DASH-type diet improves mood in postmenopausal women. Nutrition. 2012;28(9):896–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Trujillo-Mayol I, Guerra-Valle M, Casas-Forero N, Sobral MMC, Viegas O, Alarcón-Enos J, et al. Western dietary pattern antioxidant intakes and oxidative stress: importance during the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic. Adv Nutr. 2021;12(3):670–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim H, Rebholz CM, Hegde S, LaFiura C, Raghavan M, Lloyd JF, et al. Plant-based diets, pescatarian diets and COVID-19 severity: a population-based case–control study in six countries. BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health. 2021;4(1):257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tavakol Z, Ghannadi S, Tabesh MR, Halabchi F, Noormohammadpour P, Akbarpour S, et al. Relationship between physical activity, healthy lifestyle and COVID-19 disease severity; a cross-sectional study. J Public Health. 2021;4:1–9.

  17. Khorasanchi Z, Jafazadeh Esfehani A, Sharifan P, Hasanzadeh E, Shadmand Foumani Moghadam MR, Ahmadi O, et al. The effects of high dose vitamin D supplementation as a nutritional intervention strategy on biochemical and inflammatory factors in adults with COVID-19: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Nutrition and Health. 2022: https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060221082384.

  18. Ahmadnezhad M, Asadi Z, Miri HH, Ebrahimi-Mamaghani M, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Ferns GA. Validation of a short semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for adults: a pilot study. J Nutri Sci Diet. 2017;25:49–55.

  19. Fung TT, Chiuve SE, McCullough ML, Rexrode KM, Logroscino G, Hu FB. Adherence to a DASH-style diet and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke in women. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(7):713–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005;44(2):227–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sahebi A, Asghari MJ, Salari RS. Validation of depression anxiety and stress scale (DASS-21) for an Iranian population. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Morin CM, Belleville G, Bélanger L, Ivers H. The Insomnia Severity Index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response. Sleep. 2011;34(5):601–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Yazdi Z, Sadeghniiat-Haghighi K, Zohal MA, Elmizadeh K. Validity and reliability of the Iranian version of the insomnia severity index. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS. 2012;19(4):31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Buysse D, Reynolds CF III, Monk T, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep QualityIndex: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193–213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moghaddam JF, Nakhaee N, Sheibani V, Garrusi B, Amirkafi A. Reliability and validity of the Persian version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-P). Sleep and Breathing. 2012;16(1):79–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M, Gandek B. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(3):875–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. de Faria CR, Corgosinho FC, Sanches FLFZ, Prado CMM, Laviano A, Mota JF. Dietary recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nutr Rev. 2021;79(4):382–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Brown RB. Low dietary sodium potentially mediates COVID-19 prevention associated with whole-food plant-based diets. Br J Nutr. 2022;1:1–6.

  29. Wang B, Li R, Lu Z, Huang Y. Does comorbidity increase the risk of patients with COVID-19: evidence from meta-analysis. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(7):6049.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Faghih S, Babajafari S, Mirzaei A, Akhlaghi M. Adherence to the dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) dietary pattern and mental health in Iranian university students. Eur J Nutr. 2020;59(3):1001–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Taylor AM, Holscher HD. A review of dietary and microbial connections to depression, anxiety, and stress. Nutr Neurosci. 2020;23(3):237–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu X, Yan Y, Li F, Zhang D. Fruit and vegetable consumption and the risk of depression: a meta-analysis. Nutrition. 2016;32(3):296–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tsai AC, Chang T-L, Chi S-H. Frequent consumption of vegetables predicts lower risk of depression in older Taiwanese–results of a prospective population-based study. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(6):1087–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cartwright M, Wardle J, Steggles N, Simon AE, Croker H, Jarvis MJ. Stress and dietary practices in adolescents. Health Psychol. 2003;22(4):362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Głąbska D, Guzek D, Groele B, Gutkowska K. Fruit and vegetable intake and mental health in adults: A systematic review. Nutrients. 2020;12(1):115.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Skarupski KA, Tangney C, Li H, Ouyang B, Evans DA, Morris MC. Longitudinal association of vitamin B-6, folate, and vitamin B-12 with depressive symptoms among older adults over time. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92(2):330–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Mikkelsen K, Stojanovska L, Apostolopoulos V. The effects of vitamin B in depression. Curr Med Chem. 2016;23(38):4317–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Parletta N, Zarnowiecki D, Cho J, Wilson A, Bogomolova S, Villani A, et al. A Mediterranean-style dietary intervention supplemented with fish oil improves diet quality and mental health in people with depression: A randomized controlled trial (HELFIMED). Nutr Neurosci. 2019;22(7):474–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vinson JA, Cai Y. Nuts, especially walnuts, have both antioxidant quantity and efficacy and exhibit significant potential health benefits. Food Funct. 2012;3(2):134–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sangouni AA, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Mazidi M, Lane KE, Khayyatzadeh SS. The association between intake of whole grain, refined grain, fast food and carbonated drinks with depression and quality of life in Iranian adolescent girls. 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sadeghi O, Hassanzadeh-Keshteli A, Afshar H, Esmaillzadeh A, Adibi P. The association of whole and refined grains consumption with psychological disorders among Iranian adults. Eur J Nutr. 2019;58(1):211–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Crichton GE, Bryan J, Hodgson JM, Murphy KJ. Mediterranean diet adherence and self-reported psychological functioning in an Australian sample. Appetite. 2013;70:53–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. McMillan L, Owen L, Kras M, Scholey A. Behavioural effects of a 10-day Mediterranean diet. Results from a pilot study evaluating mood and cognitive performance. Appetite. 2011;56(1):143–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bahrami A, Bahrami-Taghanaki H, Khorasanchi Z, Tayefi M, Ferns GA, Sadeghnia HR, et al. The association between neuropsychological function with serum vitamins a, D, and E and hs-CRP concentrations. J Mol Neurosci. 2019;68(2):243–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kuijer RG, Boyce JA. Emotional eating and its effect on eating behaviour after a natural disaster. Appetite. 2012;58(3):936–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Uemura M, Ohira T, Yasumura S, Otsuru A, Maeda M, Harigane M, et al. Association between psychological distress and dietary intake among evacuees after the Great East Japan Earthquake in a cross-sectional study: the Fukushima Health Management Survey. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7): e011534.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Jia P, Liu L, Xie X, Yuan C, Chen H, Guo B, et al. Impacts of COVID-19 lockdown on diet patterns among youths in China: the COVID-19 Impact on Lifestyle Change Survey (COINLICS). Appetite. 2020:105015-105015.

  48. Bakırhan H, Yıldıran H, Uyar Cankay T. Associations between diet quality, DASH and Mediterranean dietary patterns and migraine characteristics. Nutritional Neuroscience. 2021;13:1–11.

  49. Weng TT, Hao JH, Qian QW, Cao H, Fu JL, Sun Y, et al. Is there any relationship between dietary patterns and depression and anxiety in Chinese adolescents? Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(4):673–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all study participants.

Funding

This study funded by Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (grant no: 981873).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zahra Khorasanchi, Asieh Ahmadihoseini, and Omalbanin Hajhoseini equally contributed as first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nutrition, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Zahra Khorasanchi, Omalbanin Hajhoseini, Zahra Dehnavi & Payam Sharifan

  2. Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Zahra Khorasanchi, Omalbanin Hajhoseini, Masoumeh Haghighi, Masoumeh Heidari & Zahra Dehnavi

  3. Department of Nutrition, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Asieh Ahmadihoseini

  4. Department of Nutrition, International UNESCO Center for Health Related Basic Sciences and Human Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 99199-91766, Mashhad, Iran

    Reza Zare-Feyzabadi, Simin Rashidianyazd, Maryam Mohammadi Bajgiran, Sara Saffar Soflaei & Majid Ghayour Mobarhan

  5. Metabolic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Ali Jafarzadeh Esfehani

  6. Department of Biology, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad university, Mashhad, Iran

    MohammadReza Latifi

  7. Nutrition Sciences, Varastegan Institute for Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

    Fatemeh Rastgooy & Danial Ildarabadi

  8. Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Division of Medical Education, Brighton, UK

    Gordon Ferns

Authors
  1. Zahra Khorasanchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Asieh Ahmadihoseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Omalbanin Hajhoseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Reza Zare-Feyzabadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Masoumeh Haghighi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Masoumeh Heidari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ali Jafarzadeh Esfehani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zahra Dehnavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Payam Sharifan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Simin Rashidianyazd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. MohammadReza Latifi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Fatemeh Rastgooy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Danial Ildarabadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Maryam Mohammadi Bajgiran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Sara Saffar Soflaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Gordon Ferns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Majid Ghayour Mobarhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MGHM initially conceptualized and designed the study, ZKH, RZ and MM upgraded the design. The manuscript was written by ZKH and AH and PSH. SSS, OH and AJE were responsible for the design optimizing and statistical analysis. FR, DI, MH, ML, ZD and SR contribute sampling. GF performed English editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid Ghayour Mobarhan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participants

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of MUMS (Mashhad University of Medical Sciences), Mashhad, Iran. (Ethic Number: IR.MUMS.REC.1399.237) and carried out based on the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in this study. For illiterate subjects, informed consent was obtained from their legal guardian.

Consent for publication

Not applicable as no personal data was used in this article.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khorasanchi, Z., Ahmadihoseini, A., Hajhoseini, O. et al. Adherence to dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) diet in relation to psychological function in recovered COVID-19 patients: a case–control study. BMC Nutr 8, 130 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-022-00633-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-022-00633-5

Keywords

BMC Nutrition

ISSN: 2055-0928

Contact us