Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

SNPs in apolipoproteins contribute to sex-dependent differences in blood lipids before and after a high-fat dietary challenge in healthy U.S. adults



The effect of genetic polymorphisms on fasting blood lipid levels have been widely studied but the effects of these within the context of a high-fat meal challenge remain less characterized. The current study aimed to investigate the association of SNPs in lipoprotein-related genes with blood lipid profiles in healthy adults in the U.S.


Subjects (n = 393) between 18–66 years of age with BMIs ranging from 18.5–45 kg/m2 were enrolled the cross-sectional Nutritional Phenotyping Study. Among them, 349 subjects (men: 48%; women: 52%) gave consent for genotyping. SNPs in APOA5, APOB, APOC3, APOE, and LDLR were assessed. The association between lipid markers and genotypes was tested separately for each SNP with analysis of variance (ANOVA), adjusted for sex, age, and BMI. We also examined two-factor interactions between SNPs and sex, age, or BMI.


Women carrying the C allele of rs3135506 in APOA5 or men carrying the C allele of rs429358 in APOE had reduced HDL-cholesterol levels during fasting and postprandially. The C allele in APOE was also correlated to increased LDL-C levels. The TT genotype of rs2854116 in APOC3 was associated with elevated total cholesterol. Additive effect of the risk alleles of APOA5 and APOE or APOC3 and APOE was detected. Nevertheless, the tested SNPs had little impact on the postprandial triglyceride responses to the high-fat challenge meal. We found no significant effects of SNPs in APOB (rs1042034) or LDLR (rs2228671) on triglycerides, cholesterol, or free fatty acid levels.


In healthy adults, fasting and postprandial cholesterol levels are strongly correlated with the tested APOA5, APOE, and APOC3 genotypes. Sex contributes to the genetic impact of the tested SNPs on lipid profiles.

Trial registration, NCT02367287. Registered February 20, 2015,

Peer Review reports


Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are one of the leading causes of death globally for over a decade and combined with Type 2 diabetes mellitus it has created a worldwide health epidemic [1]. The pathogenesis of CVDs is closely related to immune activation and inflammation, along with elevated circulating levels of triglycerides and cholesterol triggered by the consumption and accumulation of fat [2]. Lipoprotein particles are responsible for the transport of dietary and biosynthesized fats including cholesterol and triglycerides from the intestinal tract and liver to different sites of the body [3]. Apolipoproteins are recognized by a host of cell surface receptors in target tissues and thus play crucial roles in this lipid transport. Differences in lipoprotein particle densities, sizes, and apolipoprotein compositions help determine the tissue destination for particle uptake and usage [4].

Apolipoproteins are categorized based on their function, with the most well studied including the ApoAs, ApoBs, ApoCs, and ApoEs [5]. ApoAs with subtypes of ApoA1, ApoA2, ApoA4, and ApoA5 are the primary structural proteins of high-density lipoprotein particles (HDL). Importantly, ApoA5 is also associated with chylomicrons and very low-density lipoprotein particles (VLDL) to regulate triglyceride homeostasis [6,7,8]. Patients with ApoA5 deficiency are hypertriglyceridemic [9]. On the other hand, animals overexpressing the human ApoA5 decreases plasma triglyceride concentrations by 70% compared to the control [7, 8]. ApoB is the major structural protein for all lipoprotein particles, except HDL. ApoB100, the full-length form of ApoB, is a ligand for the LDL receptor (LDLR) which mediates the endocytosis of LDL from the circulation [10, 11]. Mutations in the APOB gene result in disorders of lipid metabolism, such as familial hypobetalipoproteinemia and familial ligand-defective ApoB100 [12]. In contrast, a high level of ApoB accompanied by high LDL particle concentrations is strongly associated with atherosclerosis and CVDs [13]. ApoC subtypes (ApoC1, ApoC2, and ApoC3) are associated with chylomicrons, VLDL, and HDL [14]. The ApoCs can be freely exchanged among these lipoprotein particles [5]. ApoC1 facilitates the esterification of free cholesterol into cholesterol esters in HDL [11], while ApoC2 is a co-factor for lipoprotein lipase (LPL), promoting triglyceride hydrolysis [15]. On the other hand, ApoC3 inhibits the ApoC2-mediated LPL activation [5, 11]. Importantly, ApoC3 can significantly reduce LDL clearance rate by inhibiting the receptor-mediated LDL endocytosis in the liver [16]. Thus, ApoC3 is considered as a powerful risk indicator for CVD risk and dyslipidemia [17]. ApoE is an essential apolipoprotein in cholesterol-rich lipoproteins, including chylomicron remnants, VLDL, and some HDL [18, 19]. This protein is also a ligand for LDLR-mediated hepatic LDL uptake. Three major allelic types of ApoE (ApoE2, ApoE3, and ApoE4) exist with different LDLR binding affinities [20]. Individuals carrying the homozygous APOE4 allele have elevated plasma LDL and an increased risk of atherosclerosis and CVDs [18], while those carrying the homozygous APOE2 allele have a high prevalence of type III hyperlipoproteinemia resulting in ectopic fat deposits in tissues and an elevated risk for atherosclerosis and diabetes [21]. LDLR is localized on the surface of hepatocytes where it binds to ApoB100 and ApoE directly affecting LDL clearance from the circulation [22, 23]. Mutations in the LDLR gene lead to familial hypercholesterolemia accompanied by significantly elevated LDL levels promoting atherosclerosis and CVDs [22].

Individual responses to dietary fat can differ in magnitudes and the kinetic behavior depends on both genetic, sex, and environmental factors [2]. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in APO and LDLR genes, such as rs3135506 (APOA5), rs1042034 (APOB), rs2854116 (APOC3), rs429358 (APOE), and rs2228671 (LDLR) have been associated with dyslipidemia, including elevated cholesterol, triglycerides, or both along with increased LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) or decreased HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) levels in the circulation [14, 22, 24,25,26]. Unhealthy diets, such as those with high-fat contents, are thought to contribute to the degree of dyslipidemia leading to increased risk of developing atherosclerosis and CVDs [27]. In addition, studies in quantitative trait mapping and biological samples from an UK Biobank indicate genotype by sex interactions of lipid markers, apolipoproteins and lipoproteins have implications for the assessment of disease risk in men and women [28, 29]. Sexual dimorphism has been shown to be a contributor to the diversity of lipid profiles observed in men and women due to differences in fatty acid metabolic kinetics, postprandial modulation of adipose tissue lipolysis, rate of fat oxidation, fasting responses, plasma triglyceride kinetics, VLDL metabolism, and postprandial lipemia [30,31,32,33,34]. Moreover, genetic polymorphisms that manifest in a sex-dimorphic manner can potentially escalate the sexual disparities in lipid profiles [35].

While the impact of the above mentioned apolipoprotein gene SNPs on dyslipidemia have been studied extensively, the contributions of these SNPs in lipid clearance after a high-lipid meal challenge in healthy adults are less known, especially in healthy U.S. male and female adults differing in age, and/or BMI. Moreover, we do not understand how apolipoprotein gene SNPs may interact to influence postprandial lipid metabolism. The present study analyzed the contributions of APOA5 (rs3135506), APOB (rs1042034), APOC3 (rs2854116), APOE (rs429358), and LDLR (rs2228671) on clinical lipid markers before and after a high-fat liquid meal challenge in healthy U.S. individuals recruited for a cross-sectional nutritional phenotyping study conducted by the United States Department of Agriculture/Agriculture Research Service/Western Human Nutrition Research Center (WHNRC) in Davis, California. As sex, age, and BMI could be important effect modifiers on lipid metabolism during fasting and postprandial lipid removal from the circulation, the interplay between these variables and SNPs was also examined.

Materials and methods

Study subjects and dietary challenge

Healthy U.S. adults (n = 393) aged 18–66 years old with BMI ranges of 18.5 to 45.0 kg/m2 were enrolled for a cross-sectional Nutritional Phenotyping Study (, ID: NCT02367287). For each sex group, 9 sampling bins were established to recruit subjects evenly among these bins. Three age bins, 18–33, 34–49, and 50–65 y were established, each with BMI (kg/m2) 18.5–24.9, 25.0–29.9, and 30–45.0. The original sampling plan had an upper limit of BMI at 39.9 kg/m2 [36]. But it was modified to increase the upper BMI to 45 kg/m2 to aid reaching recruitment goals. Pregnant or lactating women were excluded from the study. Other exclusion criteria included a known allergy to egg, recent surgeries or hospitalization (minor surgeries for the last 4 weeks or major surgeries/hospitalization for last 4 months), and antibiotic treatments for 4 weeks prior. Individuals who took daily medication for a diagnosed chronic disease at the time of the study were also excluded [36]. Additionally, subjects who took dietary supplements were instructed to discontinue the supplements for 3 days prior to the challenge meal test. Subjects were also instructed to only consume provided pre-test dinner and water the night before their tests. Details of recruitment and demographic characteristics of the overall population are contained in a report for this study [37].

The study included two visits to WHNRC scheduled within a period of 10–14 days. Visit 1 was the preliminary screening visit, which included an in-person informed consent procedure and a screening of vital signs to ensure the volunteers fell within expected ranges for the study. Visit 2 was the challenge meal test day. The night before the test day, the subject was provided a high carbohydrate meal (17% kcal from fat, 77% kcal from carbohydrate, and 7.5% kcal from protein) and asked to eat it by 19:00 h. The subject arrived fasted (12 h) the next morning and blood was collected before a high-fat liquid challenge meal (60% kcal from fat, 25% kcal from carbohydrates, and 15% kcal from protein) was given. Multiple blood draws were then conducted postprandially at 0.5-, 3- and 6-h [36]. Heights (m) and weights (kg) were recorded in Visit 1 and Visit 2. BMI (kg/m2) was then calculated from the averages of heights and the fasted weight from Visit 2. Waist circumference was measured using a non-elastic tape measure at the smallest horizontal circumference between the ribs and iliac crest [36].

SNP selection

A single SNP in each of 4 apolipoprotein genes, APOA5, APOC3, APOB, and APOE, and the LDLR gene were chosen in this study. We chose these SNPs based on their strong correlations with lipid metabolism-related diseases, such as stroke or metabolic syndrome revealed in multiple genome-wide association and meta-analysis studies [26, 38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45], and their relative high risk allele carrier frequencies, which would increase detection power for this particular study with relatively small participant numbers. Table 1 lists the SNP IDs for the chosen SNPs and their corresponding TaqMan assay IDs, allele frequencies in populations, nucleotide changes, codon changes, physical positions in the human genome, and the associated metabolic diseases. Four of the chosen SNPs in APOA5, APOB, APOE, and LDLR lead to missense amino acid changes in the respective protein. The SNP in APOC3 is located upstream of the APOC3 coding sequence with a potential role in regulation of APOC3 gene expression [44, 46].

Table 1 SNPs used in this study

Genomic DNA purification and quantification

Eight milliliters of whole blood were collected in a PAXgene Blood DNA Tube (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) from study subjects at 0.5 h after the challenge meal was given. Collected blood was gently inverted in the PAXgene blood DNA tube and immediately stored at -80 °C until use. Genomic DNA was then purified from the whole blood using a PAXgene Blood DNA Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen). The concentrations of DNA were measured using a NanoPhotometer™ P300 (Implen, Westlake Village, CA, USA). All DNA samples had a A260/A280 ratio greater than 1.6, indicating the purity of nucleic acids was suitable for genotyping. DNA was then diluted to 25 ng/µL for TaqMan SNP genotyping with sterilized double distilled water for subsequent TaqMan SNP genotyping assays.

SNP genotyping

TaqMan SNP probe sets for rs3135506 (Assay ID: C_25638153_10, APOA5), rs1042034 (Assay ID: C_7615376_20, APOB), rs2854116 (Assay ID: C_12081482_20, APOC3), rs429358 (Assay ID: C_3084793_20, APOE), rs2228671 (Assay ID: C_27208873_20, LDLR) were purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific (Carlsbad, CA, USA). TaqMan genotyping reactions were performed using a TaqMan SNP assay-based PCR (ThermoFisher Scientific) in an Applied Biosystems™ QuantStudio™ 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Fifty ng of genomic DNA was used for each PCR reaction. Allelic discrimination assays were performed using QuantStudio™ Real-Time PCR software (ThermoFisher Scientific). All ambiguous genotypes were repeated in independent PCR reactions.

Clinical measures

Blood was collected and serum or plasma was obtained by centrifugation at 1300 × g at 4 °C for 10 min. Lipid-related markers of cardiovascular diseases, including triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), HDL-C, LDL-C, and non-esterified free fatty acids (NEFA) were measured using a Cobas Integra 400/800 kit (Roche), a Cobas CHOL2 kit (Roche), a Cobas HDL-C plus 3rd generation kit (Roche), a Cobas LDLC3 kit (Roche), and a Wako HR Series NEFA-HR (2) kit (Wako), respectively. All assays were completed on an auto-analyzer, Integra 400 + instrument (Roche).

Statistical analysis

Allele frequency was determined by direct counting. Differences in general characteristics between genotype groups were assessed for significance using Student’s t-test. Outcome variables were assessed for conformance to the normal distribution via Box-Cox power transformations and transformed if needed; triglycerides were transformed using natural logarithm, and total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, and NEFA did not require transformation. The association between lipid parameters and genotypes was tested separately for each SNP with analysis of variance (ANOVA), adjusted for sex, age, and BMI. Two-factor interactions between SNP and sex, age, or BMI were also examined. The general characteristics were presented as mean ± S.E. P < 0.05 was considered significant.


General results

The objective of this study was to understand potential genetic contributions of apolipoprotein (APOA5, APOB, APOC3, APOE) and LDLR genes to clinical lipid measures, including total cholesterol (TC), HDL-C, LDL-C, triglycerides (TG), and non-esterified free fatty acids (NEFA), during fasting and after a high-fat liquid challenge meal. Figure 1 provides a complete diagram of participant enrollment, allocation, and analysis. A total of 393 subjects were enrolled and completed the nutritional phenotyping study, with genomic DNA available from 349 subjects (88.8% of the total enrolled subjects). The analysis cohort consisted of 167 men (48%) and 182 women (52%). Among the men, 57 (34.1%), 59 (35.3%), and 51 (30.5%) were in the age groups of 18–33, 34–49, and 50–65 years old, respectively. Among the women, 63 (34.1%), 58 (31.9%), and 61 (33.5%) were in the age groups of 18–33, 34–49, and 50–65 years old, respectively. A total of 135 (65 men and 70 women), 127 (66 men and 61 women) and 87 (36 men and 51 women) subjects were in the BMI (kg/m2) groups of 18.5–24.9 (normal weight), 34–29.9 (overweight), and 30–45 (obese), respectively.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flow diagram documenting participant enrollment, allocation, and analysis. Sex, age in years (y), and BMI in kg/m2 are shown for each allocation bin

The general characteristics, including age, height, weight, BMI, and waist circumference are shown for the genotyped participants in Table 2. Higher weight, height, and waist circumference were present in men than women (P < 0.01). Fasting blood lipid profiles, including TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, TG, and NEFA from 349 subjects are presented in Fig. 2. Most of subjects had fasting lipid values within the desirable ranges for healthy U.S. individuals in the respective age group based on the lipid reference values obtained from the Lipid Research Clinic (LRC) Program Population Studies [47]. Reference values for TC are 170—235 mg/dL for men and 175—250 mg/dL for women; LDL-C are 105—165 mg/dL for men and 110—170 mg/dL for women; HDL-C are 30—35 mg/dL for men and 40 mg/dL for women, and triglycerides are 120—210 mg/dL for men and 115—205 mg/dL for women. The reference values for fasting plasma NEFA concentrations in men and women have not been established. In this study, we observed that the average values for fasting plasma NEFA concentrations (mEq/L) were 0.29 ± 0.01 for men and 0.35 ± 0.01 for women. Women had approximately 20% higher fasting NEFA concentrations than men (P < 0.01). The NEFA levels were also positively associated with BMI (0.29 ± 0.01 mEq/L in the BMI 18.5–24.9 group; 0.31 ± 0.01 mEq/L in the 25.0–29.9 group, and 0.39 ± 0.01 mEq/L in the 30.0–45.0 group; P < 0.0001). Age-dependent increases in NEFA levels approached significance overall (0.30 ± 0.01 mEq/L in the 18.5–33 y group; 0.33 ± 0.01 mEq/L in the 34–49 y group; and 0.34 ± 0.01 mEq/L in the 50–65 y group; P = 0.054). As expected, women had higher HDL-C than men (P < 0.01).

Table 2 General characteristics of participants
Fig. 2
figure 2

Distributions of fasting lipid measures in subjects. Each open circle represents a subject and the black line is the mean of the dataset. The green line or box represents the reference values for 18.5- to 65-year-old categories obtained from the Lipid Research Clinic (LRC) Program Population Studies [47]. The 90th percentile (triglycerides), 75th percentile (cholestrol and LDL-C), and 10th percentile (HDL-C) of the LRC datasets in different age groups were used for determining the reference values. Lower (triglycerides, total cholestrol, and LDL-C) or higher (HDL-C) concentrations than the reference values are desired for reducing the risk of coronary artery disease

SNP carrier frequency

Among the genotyped participants, 6.88% of the total had a CC or CG genotype of rs3135506 (APOA5) with the dominant C genotype being the risk allele for its association with hypertriglyceridemia and cardiovascular diseases [48]. In contrast, 26.16% of the subjects had a risk GG or GA genotype of rs1042034 (APOB) for its correlation to hyperlipidemia and ischemic stroke [49, 50]. In addition, 42.22% of the subjects carried the dominant C risk allele of rs2854116 (APOC3) for either hypertriglyceridemia or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [51, 52]. Moreover, 14.33% of the subjects had a CC or CT genotype of rs429358 (APOE) with the dominant C genotype being the risk allele for coronary heart disease and Alzheimer's disease [53, 54]. Lastly, 9.34% of the subjects had a T genotype of rs2228671 (LDLR) with the dominant T genotype being the risk allele for hypercholesterolemia [55]. The comparison of allelic frequencies of the tested SNPs with the ones in the database of the 1000 Genomes Project ( is presented in Supplemental Table 1. The allele frequencies of the SNPs revealed in the current study were in agreement with the ones derived from the global population in the database. In addition, these observed SNP genotypes were evenly distributed across all age/BMI/sex groups (Supplemental Table 2).

Association of SNPs in APOA5, APOB, APOC3, APOE, and LDLR with fasting TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, TG, and NEFA levels

Most of the tested SNPs (4 out 5) were expected to have a dominant effect on protein function due to missense amino acid changes. Thus, a dominant nucleotide model was adopted for each SNP for analyzing the association of the SNP with clinical lipid measures, such as CC + CG vs GG for rs3135506 (APOA5); GG + AG vs AA for rs1042034 (APOB), CC + CT vs TT for rs2854116 (APOC3) as well as rs429358 (APOE), and CT + TT vs CC for rs2228671 (LDLR). As shown in Table 3, the adjusted mean corrected for sex, age, and BMI for fasting LDL-C concentrations were higher by 8% (8.8 mg/dL; P < 0.05) in the subjects carrying the CC or CT genotype of rs429358 (APOE). On the other hand, the adjusted mean for fasting HDL-C were reduced in these subjects by 7% (3.7 mg/dL; P < 0.05). Moreover, a significant association was detected for the SNP in APOC3 for fasting TC levels. Subjects carrying the CC or CT genotype of rs2854116 (APOC3) had higher TC levels by 5% (8.0 mg/L; P < 0.05) than those carrying the TT genotype. Additionally, fasting LDL-C levels were elevated in these subjects with high TC levels; but it did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.06). Interestingly, no correlation of the SNPs in APOA5, APOB and LDLR could be established with TG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and NEFA levels in the fasting state although the adjusted mean for fasting HDL-C levels were lower by 7% (4.0 mg/dL; P = 0.08) in individuals carrying the dominant C risk allele of the APOA5 SNP. Moreover, no significant association of the tested SNPs in APOE and APOC3 with fasting TG and NEFA levels could be found (Table 3).

Table 3 Fasting blood lipid concentrations based on SNPs in the examined genes

Since the postprandial TG response is well-known to be increased in the circulation after a high-fat intake [56] and genotypes of SNPs in APO and LDLR genes may have an impact on the postprandial TG metabolism, we therefore investigated the postprandial TG response in subjects carrying different genotypes of the tested SNPs separated by sex. We observed that serum TG levels increased slightly at 30 min post the dietary challenge and reached to the peak at 3 h postprandially (Supplemental Fig. 1). We also noticed that men had greater increase in the TG levels at 3- and/or 6-h after the challenge than women with the same genotypes of the SNPs (Supplemental Fig. 1A-E). However, no significance was detected for the interaction of SNP genotypes with postprandial TG changes in men or women in this study.

Genotype-sex interactions of apolipoproteins with HDL-C levels have been reported [57]. We, therefore, investigated sex-specific changes in HDL-C levels that were associated with the tested genotypes of the apolipoprotein genes and LDLR. As shown in Table 4, women had significantly higher fasting HDL-C levels than men regardless of their tested genotypes (P < 0.01) except for the CC or CG genotype of rs3135506 (APOA5; P > 0.05; Table 4). Women carrying the CC or CG risk genotype of rs3135506 had ~ 17% (9 mg/dL) lower HDL-C than those with the GG genotype (P < 0.05). However, this difference was not detected in men (P > 0.05). Specifically, women carrying the C dominant risk allele of rs3135506 had HDL-C levels similar to men. Moreover, men carrying the C allele of rs429358 (APOE) had significantly lower HDL-C levels (~ 12%; 5 mg/dL) than those with the TT genotype (Table 4) whereas it was not noted in women. Taken together, sex appeared to contribute to the association of genotypes of rs3135506 (APOA5) and rs429358 (APOE) with HDL-C levels (P < 0.05 after adjustment for age and BMI).

Table 4 Fasting serum HDL-C based on SNPs and sexes in the examined genes

The effects of SNPs in APOA5 and APOE on postprandial HDL-C levels after lipid challenge

To further analyze the association of SNPs in APOA5 and APOE with the metabolic pattern of HDL-C, an ANOVA was performed to draw associations between the SNPs and HDL-C levels at four different time points in men and women, which were 0- (before lipid challenge); 0.5-, 3-, and 6-h after lipid challenge (Fig. 3). Our results demonstrated that women carrying the dominant C genotype (risk allele) of the APOA5 SNP had significantly decreased HDL-C levels across all time-points by ~ 17% (9 mg/dL) compared to those with the GG genotype. Moreover, the risk APOE C allele male carriers had lower levels of HDL-C than the non-carriers by ~ 12% (5 mg/dL) before and after lipid challenge. Taken together, these results demonstrated that the risk alleles of APOA5 (rs3135506) and APOE (rs429358) SNPs negatively affected cholesterol concentrations in HDL particles in a sex-dependent manner on the genotype by sex interaction after adjustment for age and BMI (P < 0.05). However, the postprandial clearance patterns of HDL-C after lipid challenge was not affected by the genotypes of the SNPs in APOA5 and APOE in both men and women, suggesting a baseline effect of these SNPs on HDL-C levels.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of APOA5 rs23135506 and APOE rs429358 on serum HDL-C levels after lipid challenge. A. APOA5. Subjects were divided into two genotypic groups separated by sex (n = 25 and = 22 for the CC + CG genotype in men and women, respectively; n = 142 and = 160 for the GG genotype in men and women, respectively). B. APOE. Subjects were divided into two genotypic groups separated by sex (n = 40 and = 56 for the CC + CT genotype in men and women, respectively; n = 127 and = 126 for the TT genotype in men and women, respectively). All data were adjusted for age and BMI and are presented as mean ± S.E. *, P < 0.05 and **, P < 0.01 between genotypic groups within the same sex

The effects of SNPs in APOC3 and APOE on postprandial TC and LDL-C levels after lipid challenge

In the current study, interactions of the SNPs in APOC3 and APOE with TC or LDL-C concentrations were revealed in the fasting state (Table 3). We further assessed postprandial TC or LDL-C levels in different genotypic and sex groups following lipid challenge. As shown in Fig. 4A, subjects of both sexes with the dominant APOC3 C genotype (risk allele) had significantly higher TC concentrations (~ 4%; 8 mg/dL after adjustment for age and BMI) than those with the TT genotype at 0- and 0.5-h post lipid challenge. TC levels tended to remain at higher levels in subjects carrying the risk allele at 3- and 6-h post challenge. However, it did not reach statistical significance for both time points (P = 0.05 for the 3-h time point and P = 0.08 for the 6-h time point). Moreover, we found that the APOE SNP-mediated difference in fasting LDL-C levels (Table 3) was mainly contributed by men (P < 0.05 on the genotype by sex interaction after adjustment for age and BMI). As shown in Fig. 4B, men carrying the dominant C allele had ~ 7% (8 mg/dL) higher LDL-C levels than those with the TT allele (P < 0.05) and this difference remained postprandially. A similar trend was observed in women before and after lipid challenge. However, no statistical significance was detected (P > 0.05). Again, it was noted that the postprandial clearance patterns of TC or LDL-C was not influenced by either APOC3 or APOE SNP after lipid challenge (Fig. 4A and B).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effects of APOC3 rs2854116 and APOE rs429358 on blood TC and LDL-C levels after lipid challenge. A. APOC3. Subjects were grouped into two genotypic groups separated by sex (n = 108 and = 122 for the CC + CT genotype in men and women, respectively; n = 58 and = 59 for the TT genotype in men and women, respectively). B. APOE. Subjects were grouped into two genotypic groups and separated by sex (n = 40 and = 56 for the CC + CT genotype in men and women, respectively; n = 127 and = 126 for the TT genotype in men and women, respectively). All data were adjusted for age and BMI and are presented as mean ± S.E. *, P < 0.05 between two genotypic groups within the same sex. P = 0.05 between two genotypes within the same sex. TC = total cholestrol

Additive effects of the SNPs in APOA5/APOE and APOC3/APOE on lipid markers

The risk genotypes of SNPs in APOA5 (P = 0.08) and AOPE (P < 0.05) displayed negative correlations with HDL-C levels at fasting (Table 3). Therefore, we examined whether the carriers for both APOA5 and APOE risk alleles showed a difference in serum lipid levels, i.e., a potential additive effect of the risk alleles on the levels of TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, TG, and NEFA before and after lipid challenge. As shown in Table 5, 18 of the 349 genotyped subjects were carriers for both risk alleles of APOA5 and APOE SNPs, while 224 of them were non-carriers. We observed an additive effect of risk alleles of APOA5 and APOE for HDL-C (~ 10–12% or ~ 6 mg/dL) throughout the 6-h course of the lipid challenge. However, it was not statistically significant after the data were adjusted for age, sex, and BMI (P > 0.05), indicating that the difference was largely driven by other independent variables rather than SNP genotypes (Table 5). Importantly, fasting LDL-C was significantly increased by ~ 12% (15 mg/dL) in subjects carrying both risk alleles of APOA5 and APOE compared to the non-carriers (P < 0.05). This difference was maintained postprandially (P < 0.05), suggesting the effect at the baseline might be the causal effect on LDL-C levels. Nevertheless, other lipid measures, such as TC, TG, and NEFA, were not significantly affected by the combination of the risk alleles of APOA5 and APOE (Table 5). Lastly, subjects carrying the double risk alleles of APOA5 and APOE had a similar postprandial clearance patterns of HDL-C and LDL-C that were similar to these carrying the non-risk alleles of APOA5 and APOE (Table 5).

Table 5 Lipid concentrations after dietary challenge in subjects carrying both risk alleles of APOA5 and APOE

Additive effects of the risk alleles of APOC3 and APOE SNPs on lipid markers were also evaluated in both fasting and postprandial states. As shown in Table 6, carriers of the double risk alleles (CC or CT for both APOC3 and APOE; n = 21) had lower NEFA concentrations 6-h after lipid challenge (decreased ~ 24% or 0.11 mEq/L; P < 0.01 after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI) than the non-carriers (n = 130). Nonetheless, the presence of the double risk alleles of APOC3 and APOE SNPs had limited impact on other tested lipid markers before and after lipid challenge.

Table 6 Lipid concentrations after dietary challenge in subjects carrying both risk alleles of APOC3 and APOE


In this study, we aimed to draw an association between lipid-metabolic parameters and SNPs in apolipoprotein and their receptor genes and to assess their impact on postprandial lipid patterns following a liquid high-fat meal challenge. Of all the clinical lipid markers studied, total cholesterol, HDL-C, and LDL-C were the ones with significant associations with the tested SNPs in APOA5, APOE, and APOC3.

We showed that the risk allele of rs3135506 in APOA5 was significantly associated with serum HDL-C levels in a sex-dependent manner. Specifically, the dominant risk C allele of the SNP was associated with lower HDL-C levels in women (Fig. 3). It is known that HDL-C levels differ between men and women. In general, women have higher HDL-C than men [58]. Our results demonstrate that this sex difference is diminished in women carrying the risk allele of rs3135506. Clinically, HDL-C is known as “the good cholesterol” as studies showed its association with a lower risk of coronary heart disease [59,60,61,62]. It is commonly recognized that HDL-C exerts its protective effects towards arteries and the heart by transporting cholesterol away from extrahepatic tissues, particularly steroidogenic tissues. By doing so, it removes cholesterol from the arteries, delivering them to the liver [59,60,61,62]. The current study is the first report to show an association of rs3135506 with HDL-C levels in healthy women before and after a meal challenge. Our study suggests that the risk allele of rs3135506 could act as an independent cardiovascular risk factor for women who carry the risk allele.

ApoA5 is an activator of lipoprotein lipase [8] and null mutations in the human APOA5 gene leads to high blood TG levels [9]. Therefore, its role in TG metabolism and the therapeutic modification of TG levels have been major research topics. Surprisingly, in the current study cohort, we did not detect an association of the risk allele of rs3135506 with TG levels in healthy adults or, specifically, in healthy women with lower HDL-C levels. It is plausible that ApoA5, particularly with the SNP rs3135506, could profoundly modulate HDL-C metabolism, even before its direct impact on blood triglyceride levels. One potential hypothesis is that the APOA5 SNP can mechanistically influence the levels of HDL-C by affecting the maturation of HDL. First, ApoA5 is highly associated with the HDL particles even though the concentration is relatively low compared to other apolipoproteins [63]. Second, it is known that circulating TG levels directly correspond with the TG content in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TGRL) [64]. When TG contents rise, ApoA5 moves to TGRL. Conversely, ApoA5 slowly moves back to HDL when TG contents decrease in TGRL after hydrolysis [65]. Lastly, ApoA5 enhances the activity of lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) that promotes cholesterol efflux [66]. Although all of the above evidence supports that ApoA5 may modulate HDL and cholesterol metabolism, the underlying mechanism by which ApoA5 regulates blood HDL-C concentrations needs to be further elucidated by structural and functional studies.

It is well acknowledged that increased LDL-C level is a risk factor for coronary heart disease [67]. In this study, we found that the risk C allele of rs429358 in APOE could significantly increase LDL-C levels in both fasting and postprandial states (Table 3 and Fig. 4). Most importantly, this risk allele also had a negative impact on HDL-C levels in men (Table 4). Moreover, a combination of the risk alleles of rs3135506 and rs429358 significantly augmented the difference in LDL-C levels between the risk allele carriers and non-carriers (Table 5). Studies from others have shown that ApoE acts as a ligand for LDLR [68]. Thus, it has an anti-atherogenic role in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease by mediating chylomicron and VLDL remnant particle clearance. It has also been shown that the impact of ApoE on LDL-C levels is associated with different isoforms of ApoE, with the impact increasing in the order of ApoE2, ApoE3 and ApoE4, and ApoE4 being detrimental [69]. The C allele of rs429358 is one of the determining elements for the ApoE4 isoform along with the C allele of rs7412. ApoE4 preferentially binds to VLDL while ApoE3 to HDL. This property of binding to VLDL over HDL by ApoE4 is strongly associated with an atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype in ApoE4 carriers. Together, our results suggest that the C allele of rs429358 has a detrimental effect on cholesterol metabolism, especially in men, and hence men carrying this risk allele may be at a higher risk of cardiovascular disease than the non-carriers.

Apart from the finding mentioned above, this study also revealed the association of rs2854116 in APOC3 with total cholesterol levels and to a lesser extent with LDL-C levels during fasting and postprandially (Table 3 and Fig. 4). Additionally, the current study suggests that this SNP might affect fasting LDL-C levels in women (P = 0.07). In a meta-analysis study, the rs2854116 risk allele was positively associated with TG levels while negatively associated with HDL-C levels [70]. Additionally, ApoC3 is primarily associated with cholesterol-rich lipoproteins, such as chylomicrons, VLDL, and LDL [14]. Therefore, as the current study supports, ApoC3 appears to be a key regulator of cholesterol metabolism, in addition to its well documented role in TG metabolism [70]. This theory is also supported by a genetic study performed in a northern French population, which reported a correlation of rs2854116 with elevated LDL-C levels in women [71]. The molecular mechanism of the association remains unclear. The rs2854116 variant is located upstream of the APOC3 transcription start site. Thus, a plausible explanation would be that the SNP might negatively influence APOC3 mRNA expression leading to increased rates of conversion of VLDL to LDL particles due to reduced availability of ApoC3 to inhibit lipoprotein lipase-mediated lipolysis [51]. This could subsequently elevate circulating total cholesterol and LDL-C likely induced by a decrease of hepatic uptake of VLDL remnants.

Interestingly, an inverse association of NEFA concentrations in the circulation with the combination of the risk alleles rs2854116 in APOC3 and rs429358 in APOE was found 6-h after lipid challenge (Table 6). Reduced circulating NEFA is correlated with a lower ability to oxidize fat and subsequently liberate NEFA into the plasma from the adipose tissue leading to metabolic deterioration [72, 73]. Furthermore, metabolically healthy obese individuals with high fasting NEFA levels are less likely to develop type 2 diabetes than their insulin-resistant counterparts [74]. Thus, a reduction in 6-h circulating NEFA levels found in the current study may suggest less fat oxidation in subjects carrying the double risk alleles of the SNPs in APOC3 and APOE, which may increase risks of obesity as well as type 2 diabetes in these individuals.

Although strong associations between SNPs and cholesterol profiles were found in this study, there were limitations in the current study that confounded the findings. First, the population size assessed in this study was relatively small, which may hinder significant association of the tested SNPs with TG metabolism as there were dramatic inter-individual differences among the subjects. Second, other phenotypic measurements, such as the sizes of lipoproteins, which contribute to specific functions of their subtypes, and plasma transfer proteins for lipoproteins, including plasma phospholipid-transfer protein (PLTP) and cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP), were not measured. Thus, this study could not provide further information on the effects of SNPs on lipoprotein subtypes or interactions with these other important protein modulators of lipoprotein metabolism.


To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to investigate the effect of apolipoprotein allelic variants on blood lipid profiles in healthy adults challenged with a liquid high-fat diet. We identified significant associations of rs3135506 (APOA5), rs429358 (APOE), and rs2854116 (APOC3) with cholesterol metabolism, while the two SNPs in APOA5 and APOC3 have been previously recognized as influencers of TG levels. Moreover, we showed that the impact of APOA5 and APOE SNP on HDL-C and LDL-C levels were sex-dependent. Our results suggest that the impact of the SNP variants in the above apolipoproteins might be particularly important for basal cholesterol metabolism but not postprandial cholesterol behavior. These findings provide novel insights into the roles of APOA5, APOE, and APOC3 in modulating cholesterol and NEFA metabolism, demonstrating that individuals who carry the non-risk alleles of the tested SNPs of AOPA5, APOE, and APOC3 may have reduced genetic risks for cardiovascular disease. The current study also suggests the need for more studies assessing sex-specific risks of cardiovascular disease.

Availability of data and materials

Requests for published data from the USDA-ARS WHNRC Nutritional Phenotyping Study should be made via an email to the senior WHNRC author on the publication of interest ( Requests will be reviewed quarterly by a committee consisting of the study investigators.



Apolipoprotein A5


Apolipoprotein B


Apolipoprotein C3


Apolipoprotein 4


High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol


Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol


Total cholesterol




Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins


Non-esterified free fatty acids


Cardiovascular diseases


  1. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9945):766–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. van Oostrom AJ, Rabelink TJ, Verseyden C, Sijmonsma TP, Plokker HW, De Jaegere PP, et al. Activation of leukocytes by postprandial lipemia in healthy volunteers. Atherosclerosis. 2004;177(1):175–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Perez-Martinez P, Garcia-Quintana JM, Yubero-Serrano EM, Tasset-Cuevas I, Tunez I, Garcia-Rios A, et al. Postprandial oxidative stress is modified by dietary fat: evidence from a human intervention study. Clin Sci (Lond). 2010;119(6):251–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dominiczak MH, Caslake MJ. Apolipoproteins: metabolic role and clinical biochemistry applications. Ann Clin Biochem. 2011;48(Pt 6):498–515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Feingold KR, Grunfeld C. Obesity and Dyslipidemia. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Grossman A, et al., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA)2000.

  6. Garelnabi M, Lor K, Jin J, Chai F, Santanam N. The paradox of ApoA5 modulation of triglycerides: evidence from clinical and basic research. Clin Biochem. 2013;46(1–2):12–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van der Vliet HN, Sammels MG, Leegwater AC, Levels JH, Reitsma PH, Boers W, et al. Apolipoprotein A-V: a novel apolipoprotein associated with an early phase of liver regeneration. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(48):44512–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pennacchio LA, Olivier M, Hubacek JA, Cohen JC, Cox DR, Fruchart JC, et al. An apolipoprotein influencing triglycerides in humans and mice revealed by comparative sequencing. Science. 2001;294(5540):169–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Calandra S, Priore Oliva C, Tarugi P, Bertolini S. APOA5 and triglyceride metabolism, lesson from human APOA5 deficiency. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2006;17(2):122–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen SH, Yang CY, Chen PF, Setzer D, Tanimura M, Li WH, et al. The complete cDNA and amino acid sequence of human apolipoprotein B-100. J Biol Chem. 1986;261(28):12918–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahley RW, Innerarity TL, Rall SC Jr, Weisgraber KH. Plasma lipoproteins: apolipoprotein structure and function. J Lipid Res. 1984;25(12):1277–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Whitfield AJ, Barrett PH, van Bockxmeer FM, Burnett JR. Lipid disorders and mutations in the APOB gene. Clin Chem. 2004;50(10):1725–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shapiro MD, Fazio S. Apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. F1000Res. 2017;6:134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kiani R. Dyslipidemia. Maleki M, Alizadehasl, A., Haghjoo, M., editor. US: Elsevier; 2018.

  15. Jong MC, Hofker MH, Havekes LM. Role of ApoCs in lipoprotein metabolism: functional differences between ApoC1, ApoC2, and ApoC3. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19(3):472–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gordts PL, Nock R, Son NH, Ramms B, Lew I, Gonzales JC, et al. ApoC-III inhibits clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins through LDL family receptors. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(8):2855–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Taskinen MR, Boren J. Why Is Apolipoprotein CIII Emerging as a Novel Therapeutic Target to Reduce the Burden of Cardiovascular Disease? Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2016;18(10):59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mahley RW. Apolipoprotein E: from cardiovascular disease to neurodegenerative disorders. J Mol Med (Berl). 2016;94(7):739–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Okada M, Matsui H, Ito Y, Fujiwara A. Direct measurement of HDL cholesterol: method eliminating apolipoprotein E-rich particles. J Clin Lab Anal. 2001;15(4):223–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Huebbe P, Rimbach G. Evolution of human apolipoprotein E (APOE) isoforms: Gene structure, protein function and interaction with dietary factors. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;37:146–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahley RW, Rall SC Jr. Apolipoprotein E: far more than a lipid transport protein. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2000;1:507–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Willnow TE. The low-density lipoprotein receptor gene family: multiple roles in lipid metabolism. J Mol Med (Berl). 1999;77(3):306–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Takahashi S, Kawarabayasi Y, Nakai T, Sakai J, Yamamoto T. Rabbit very low density lipoprotein receptor: a low density lipoprotein receptor-like protein with distinct ligand specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(19):9252–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Morjane I, Charoute H, Ouatou S, Elkhattabi L, Benrahma H, Saile R, et al. Association of c.56C > G (rs3135506) Apolipoprotein A5 Gene Polymorphism with Coronary Artery Disease in Moroccan Subjects: A Case-Control Study and an Updated Meta-Analysis. Cardiol Res Pract. 2020;2020:5981971.

  25. Mahley RW. Central Nervous System Lipoproteins: ApoE and Regulation of Cholesterol Metabolism. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36(7):1305–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang FH, Yin RX, Yao LM, Yan RQ, Lu L, Su Y. Correlation Between the APOB rs1042034 SNP and Blood Lipid Characteristics of 2 Ethnic Groups in China. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019;25:1076029619892088.

  27. Kelly RB. Diet and exercise in the management of hyperlipidemia. Am Fam Physician. 2010;81(9):1097–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Towne B, Blangero J, Siervogel RM. Genotype by sex interaction in measures of lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins. Genet Epidemiol. 1993;10(6):611–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Li M, Zhao JV, Kwok MK, Schooling CM. Age and sex specific effects of APOE genotypes on ischemic heart disease and its risk factors in the UK Biobank. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):9229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Jensen MD. Gender differences in regional fatty acid metabolism before and after meal ingestion. J Clin Invest. 1995;96(5):2297–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang X, Magkos F, Mittendorfer B. Sex differences in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism: it’s not just about sex hormones. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(4):885–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Johnson JL, Slentz CA, Duscha BD, Samsa GP, McCartney JS, Houmard JA, et al. Gender and racial differences in lipoprotein subclass distributions: the STRRIDE study. Atherosclerosis. 2004;176(2):371–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Perez-Martinez P, Lopez-Miranda J, Perez-Jimenez F, Ordovas JM. Influence of genetic factors in the modulation of postprandial lipemia. Atheroscler Suppl. 2008;9(2):49–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mittendorfer B, Horowitz JF, Klein S. Gender differences in lipid and glucose kinetics during short-term fasting. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001;281(6):E1333-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mittendorfer B. Sexual dimorphism in human lipid metabolism. J Nutr. 2005;135(4):681–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Baldiviez LM, Keim NL, Laugero KD, Hwang DH, Huang L, Woodhouse LR, et al. Design and implementation of a crosssectional nutritional phenotyping study in healthy US adults. BMC Nutrition. 2017;3:79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dimitratos SM, Hercules M, Stephensen CB, Cervantes E, Laugero KD. Association between physiological stress load and diet quality patterns differs between male and female adults. Physiol Behav. 2021;240:113538.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Au A, Griffiths LR, Irene L, Kooi CW, Wei LK. The impact of APOA5, APOB, APOC3 and ABCA1 gene polymorphisms on ischemic stroke: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2017;265:60–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Khlebus E, Kutsenko V, Meshkov A, Ershova A, Kiseleva A, Shevtsov A, et al. Multiple rare and common variants in APOB gene locus associated with oxidatively modified low-density lipoprotein levels. PLoS One. 2019;14(5).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Povel CM, Boer JM, Imholz S, Dolle ME, Feskens EJ. Genetic variants in lipid metabolism are independently associated with multiple features of the metabolic syndrome. Lipids Health Dis. 2011;10:118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Ye H, Zhao Q, Huang Y, Wang L, Liu H, Wang C, et al. Meta-analysis of low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) rs2228671 polymorphism and coronary heart disease. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:564940.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Ouatou S, Ajjemami M, Charoute H, Sefri H, Ghalim N, Rhaissi H, et al. Association of APOA5 rs662799 and rs3135506 polymorphisms with arterial hypertension in Moroccan patients. Lipids Health Dis. 2014;13:60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Ken-Dror G, Goldbourt U, Dankner R. Different effects of apolipoprotein A5 SNPs and haplotypes on triglyceride concentration in three ethnic origins. J Hum Genet. 2010;55(5):300–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Li WW, Dammerman MM, Smith JD, Metzger S, Breslow JL, Leff T. Common genetic variation in the promoter of the human apo CIII gene abolishes regulation by insulin and may contribute to hypertriglyceridemia. J Clin Invest. 1995;96(6):2601–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Rasmussen KL, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG, Frikke-Schmidt R. Plasma levels of apolipoprotein E and risk of ischemic heart disease in the general population. Atherosclerosis. 2016;246:63–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang Y, Yin X, Li L, Deng S, He Z. Association of Apolipoprotein C3 Genetic Polymorphisms with the Risk of Ischemic Stroke in the Northern Chinese Han Population. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0163910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rifkind BM, Segal P. Lipid Research Clinics Program reference values for hyperlipidemia and hypolipidemia. JAMA. 1983;250(14):1869–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kao JT, Wen HC, Chien KL, Hsu HC, Lin SW. A novel genetic variant in the apolipoprotein A5 gene is associated with hypertriglyceridemia. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12(19):2533–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gu QL, Han Y, Lan YM, Li Y, Kou W, Zhou YS, et al. Association between polymorphisms in the APOB gene and hyperlipidemia in the Chinese Yugur population. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2017;50(11):e6613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhou F, Guo T, Zhou L, Zhou Y, Yu D. Variants in the APOB gene was associated with Ischemic Stroke susceptibility in Chinese Han male population. Oncotarge. 2018;9(2):2249–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Reyes-Soffer G, Sztalryd C, Horenstein RB, Holleran S, Matveyenko A, Thomas T, et al. Effects of APOC3 Heterozygous Deficiency on Plasma Lipid and Lipoprotein Metabolism. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019;39(1):63–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Petersen KF, Dufour S, Hariri A, Nelson-Williams C, Foo JN, Zhang XM, et al. Apolipoprotein C3 gene variants in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(12):1082–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Drenos F, Talmud PJ, Casas JP, Smeeth L, Palmen J, Humphries SE, et al. Integrated associations of genotypes with multiple blood biomarkers linked to coronary heart disease risk. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(12):2305–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel DE, Gaskell PC, Small GW, et al. Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science. 1993;261(5123):921–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hobbs HH, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Molecular genetics of the LDL receptor gene in familial hypercholesterolemia. Hum Mutat. 1992;1(6):445–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. DiNicolantonio JJ, O’Keefe JH. Effects of dietary fats on blood lipids: a review of direct comparison trials. Open Heart. 2018;5(2):e000871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Mosher MJ, Lange LA, Howard BV, Lee ET, Best LG, Fabsitz RR, et al. Sex-specific interaction between APOE genotype and carbohydrate intake affects plasma HDL-C levels: the Strong Heart Family Study. Genes Nutr. 2008;3(2):87–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Davis CE, Williams DH, Oganov RG, Tao SC, Rywik SL, Stein Y, et al. Sex difference in high density lipoprotein cholesterol in six countries. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143(11):1100–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Genest JJ, McNamara JR, Salem DN, Schaefer EJ. Prevalence of risk factors in men with premature coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1991;67(15):1185–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Fisher EA, Feig JE, Hewing B, Hazen SL, Smith JD. High-density lipoprotein function, dysfunction, and reverse cholesterol transport. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32(12):2813–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Gordon DJ, Probstfield JL, Garrison RJ, Neaton JD, Castelli WP, Knoke JD, et al. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease. Four prospective American studies. Circulation. 1989;79(1):8–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Krieger M. Scavenger receptor class B type I is a multiligand HDL receptor that influences diverse physiologic systems. J Clin Invest. 2001;108(6):793–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. O’Brien PJ, Alborn WE, Sloan JH, Ulmer M, Boodhoo A, Knierman MD, et al. The novel apolipoprotein A5 is present in human serum, is associated with VLDL, HDL, and chylomicrons, and circulates at very low concentrations compared with other apolipoproteins. Clin Chem. 2005;51(2):351–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Chapman MJ, Ginsberg HN, Amarenco P, Andreotti F, Boren J, Catapano AL, et al. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence and guidance for management. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(11):1345–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Dai W, Zhang Z, Yao C, Zhao S. Emerging evidences for the opposite role of apolipoprotein C3 and apolipoprotein A5 in lipid metabolism and coronary artery disease. Lipids Health Dis. 2019;18(1):220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Qu S, Perdomo G, Su D, D’Souza FM, Shachter NS, Dong HH. Effects of apoA-V on HDL and VLDL metabolism in APOC3 transgenic mice. J Lipid Res. 2007;48(7):1476–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Castelli WP. Cholesterol and lipids in the risk of coronary artery disease--the Framingham Heart Study. Can J Cardiol. 1988;4 Suppl A:5A-10A.

  68. Mahley RW. Apolipoprotein E: cholesterol transport protein with expanding role in cell biology. Science. 1988;240(4852):622–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Ruiz J, Kouiavskaia D, Migliorini M, Robinson S, Saenko EL, Gorlatova N, et al. The apoE isoform binding properties of the VLDL receptor reveal marked differences from LRP and the LDL receptor. J Lipid Res. 2005;46(8):1721–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Li Y, Li C, Gao J. Apolipoprotein C3 gene variants and the risk of coronary heart disease: A meta-analysis. Meta Gene. 2016;9:104–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Dallongeville J, Meirhaeghe A, Cottel D, Fruchart JC, Amouyel P, Helbecque N. Gender related association between genetic variations of APOC-III gene and lipid and lipoprotein variables in northern France. Atherosclerosis. 2000;150(1):149–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Il’yasova D, Wang F, D’Agostino RB Jr, Hanley A, Wagenknecht LE. Prospective association between fasting NEFA and type 2 diabetes: impact of post-load glucose. Diabetologia. 2010;53(5):866–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Karpe F, Dickmann JR, Frayn KN. Fatty acids, obesity, and insulin resistance: time for a reevaluation. Diabetes. 2011;60(10):2441–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Stefan N, Kantartzis K, Machann J, Schick F, Thamer C, Rittig K, et al. Identification and characterization of metabolically benign obesity in humans. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(15):1609–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank USDA/ARS/Western Human Nutrition Research Center for the general support for this research. The authors would like to thank Janet Peerson for statistical analysis and Eduardo Cervantes, Dustin Burnett, RD, Yasmine Bouzid, Lacey Baldiviez, PhD and Joseph Domek for conducting subject recruitment, diet preparation, data entry, and lipid measurements.


This work was supported by USDA/ARS/Western Human Nutrition Research Center project funds (2032–51000-004-00D, 2032–51000-005-00D, 2032–51000-022-00D, 2032–51530-025-00D, and 2032–51530-026-00D). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. The project was also supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through grant number UL1 TR001860. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the USDA or NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



LH conceived the project, designed scientific objectives, analyzed the data, created figures and tables, participated in drafting the manuscript, and final approval of the manuscript. YEW performed genomic DNA purification, quantification; carried out SNP genotyping and analysis, and drafted the manuscript. CPK optimized protocols for genomic DNA purification and was involved in blood DNA purification, quantification, SNP genotyping, and edited the manuscript. LW organized and supervised the measurements of clinical markers and participated in manuscript editing. CBS was the project administrator and principal investigator, supervised the project, reviewed and edited the manuscript. BB was the co-principal investigator, supervised the project, reviewed and edited the manuscript. JN was the co-investigator for the project and reviewed and edited the manuscript. NK was the co-investigator for the project and reviewed and edited the manuscript. ELB managed and supervised the subject administration for the study. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liping Huang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was registered on (ID: NCT02367287) and received ethical approval from the University of California Davis Institutional Review Board. This study also adhered to CONSORT guidelines. This study was carried out at the USDA/Agriculture Research Service/Western Human Nutrition Research Center at Davis, CA. Generally healthy people living near Davis, CA were invited to participate in this cross-sectional study. Eligible volunteers after telephone interview with study personnel were invited to visit the USDA WHNRC for an in-person discussion of the consent document with authorized study personnel. Volunteers were allowed time for personal review of the document and given the opportunity for a question and answer session, as needed. The consent form were signed and dated by both the volunteer and the authorized study personnel when the volunteer decided to participate the study.

Informed consent forms were obtained from all participates in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:


Additional file 2:

Supplemental Table 1.  Comparison of the observed SNP frequencies between this study and the 1000 genome project. 

Additional file 3:

Supplemental Table 2.  Distribution of the observed SNP genotype in sex/age/BMI groups. 

Additional file 4: Supplemental Fig. 1. 

Effects of SNPs in APOA5, APOC3, APOB, APOE, and LDLR on serum triglyceride levels after lipid challenge. Subjects were divided into two genotypic groups separated by sex. A. APOA5 (n=25 and =22 for the CC+CG genotype in men and women, respectively; n=142 and =160 for the GG genotype in men and women, respectively). B. APOC3 (n=108 and =122 for the CC+CT genotype in men and women, respectively; n=58 and =59 for the TT genotype in men and women, respectively). C. APOB (n=72 and =82 for the CC+CT genotype in men and women, respectively; n=93 and =90 for the TT genotype in men and women, respectively). D. APOE (n=40 and =56 for the CC+CT genotype in men and women, respectively; n=127 and =126 for the TT genotype in men and women, respectively). E. LDLR (n=31 for the CT+TT genotype in both men and women; n=135 and =151 for the CC genotype in men and women, respectively). All data were adjusted for age and BMI and are presented as mean±SE. *,P<0.05 between sex groups carrying the same genotype. TG=triglycerides. 

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y.E., Kirschke, C.P., Woodhouse, L.R. et al. SNPs in apolipoproteins contribute to sex-dependent differences in blood lipids before and after a high-fat dietary challenge in healthy U.S. adults. BMC Nutr 8, 95 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: