Skip to main content

High intake of dietary phytochemical index may be related to reducing risk of diabetic nephropathy: a case–control study

Abstract

Objective

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is involved in 40% of patients with type 2 diabetes, Phytochemical index (PI) foods are known as antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agents. Higher intake of phytochemicals can improve glucose tolerance, hypertension and complications of DN. This study sought to discern the relationship between dietary PI and DN.

Methods

This was a case–control study which was conducted between 210 diabetic women. General characteristics, blood pressure, biochemical serum levels, and anthropometric measurements were evaluated. Physical activity and dietary intakes were assessed via short form of physical activity questionnaire and 147 items-validated food frequency questionnaires, respectively. Then, PI was calculated through method of McCarty and divided to 2 groups of lower and higher of median. Independent samples T tests were used to identify differences in quantitative variables. To investigate the relationship between dietary PI and risk of DN, logistic regression was used. The odds ratio (OR) of DN, and its 95% confidence interval (CI), in each groups of PI were shown.

Results

The percentage of daily intake of energy from fruits and vegetables were higher than the other sources of phytochemical rich foods. Higher consumption of vitamin A was seen in higher group of PI among the control group, after adjusting for energy intake. In the higher adherence of median of dietary PI group, intake of fruits, vegetables, legumes, grains, and olives of controls were higher than cases. In addition, soy consumption was statistically different between lower and higher adherence of median of dietary PI among cases. There was an inverse relationship between dietary PI and risk of DN (OR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.25–0.77; P = 0.04). After adjusting for potential confounders, the association remained significant, albeit with lower odds of having DN (OR = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.06–0.36; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Finally, the present study found evidence indicating an inverse relationship between consumption of foods rich in phytochemicals and risk of DN in this sample.

Highlights

• Higher intakes of phytochemical rich foods may be associated with lower risk of diabetic nephropathy.

• Consumption of vitamin A, fruits, vegetables, legumes, grains, and olives may prevent nephropathy among patients with diabetes.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disorder, characterized by non-insulin dependent hyperglycemia. Polyuria, polydipsia, blurred vision and feeling tired are the common signs of the disorder; whilst uncontrolled hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia may alter organs function, including kidney, eyes, and nerves [1]. Diabetic kidney disease is involved in around 40% of patients with type 2 diabetes. The global diabetes prevalence in 2019 is estimated to be 9.3% (463 million people) and 10.9% (700 million) by 2045 [2]. Indeed, diabetes is the ninth direct cause of death in women in the world, and women with type 2 diabetes are more susceptible to not being treated than male counterparts [3]. Impaired endothelial integrity, microalbuminuria, and impairment of nitric oxide transport, and loss of glomerular filtration capabilities are seen in diabetic nephropathy (DN) [4]. Older age, sex (men), race/ethnicity, family history of DN, genetic, hypertension, kidney injuries, toxins and smoking can be risk factors for DN [5], whilst one of the most significant factors that may be related with DN is dietary intakes [6]. An observational study showed that adherence to the Mediterranean diet which included a high consumption of monounsaturated fat by using olive oil was associated with lower risk of kidney function decline. Another dietary strategy which can postpone developing blood pressure and DM is Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH). Higher intake of vegetables, whole grains, and fruit and plant proteins (e.g., nuts, seeds, and beans) and its components (e.g., potassium or isoflavones) may have this effect [6].

Phytochemicals are bioactive substances derived from plants, which are abundant in fruits, vegetables, legumes, whole grains, and nuts [7]. Studies have shown many positive benefits for human health, especially metabolic disorders; for instance, an inverse association between phytochemical intakes and prediabetes was reported in Kim et al. [8]. Polyphenols, phytoestrogens, and organosulfur and plant sterols, which we term dietary phytochemicals, can help control blood glucose, hypertension, and insulin level [7]. Phytochemicals are known as antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agents, and previous studies have suggested that consumption of different phytochemicals can help control fasting blood glucose in healthy and diabetic patients [9]. Polyphenols regulate insulin production, fight against oxidative stress in pancreatic β-cells, induce the cell membrane localization of GLUT4 via the activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. Quercetin, a flavonoid rich in onion, have play a role in reducing blood pressure, visceral fat, promoting the apoptosis of adipocytes, while genistein, a flavonoid high in soy products, is associated with decreases in body fat mass and increases in high density lipoprotein (HDL) and glucose tolerance [10]. Phytochemical index (PI), incepted by McCarty, is defined as a percentage of calories intake derived from food rich in phytochemicals [11]. Flavonoids, which are a part of PI, can enhance endothelial cell function; in addition, olives, legumes, fruits, and vegetables (subgroups of PI) can improve hypertension, which is directly associated with nephron health [9]. According to past studies, a higher PI is associated with lower accumulation of fat especially in waist circumference, blood pressure, and lipid profiles level. Overall, higher intake of phytochemicals from foods can improve complications of DN [8].

Based on the high prevalence of DN in women in Iran, it is necessary to discern dietary factors that may be associated with this disease [12]. Given that no study has investigated the relationship between PI and DN, the aim of this study was to investigate the association between dietary PI and DN among Iranian women.

Materials and methods

Population

This case–control study was conducted in Kowsar Diabetes Clinic in Semnan, Iran in 2016. For both case and control groups, participants were included if they were women, diagnosed type 2 diabetes, aged between 30–65 years, fasting blood glucose (FBG) ≥ 126 mg/dl, or 2-h post-load blood glucose (2hrBG) ≥ 200 mg/dl; glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 6.5% for 3–10 years [13]. Women with any chronic diseases, such as hepatic disease, coronary angiography, stroke, cancer, autoimmune disorders, etc. were excluded. The pregnant and lactating women were excluded. The medical history of patient was asked too. Half of the participants who were in the case group had diabetic nephropathy (DN). DN is diagnosed by persistent albuminuria on two or more occasions, separated at least by three months on early morning urine samples [14]. Urinary albumin level was calculated in a random spot urine sample by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [sensitivity 0.001 mg/L; coefficient of variation (CV) 4.5e7.6%]. Urinary mg of albumin per gram of creatinine (ACR) ≥ 30 mg/g was discerned in a random spot urine sample [15]. According to the patient’s medical history, the patients had glomerular filtration rate < 60. 105 women were chosen as cases with DN. 105 controls were selected by a 1:1 matching to 105 cases by age at 1-year intervals and diabetes duration at 6-month intervals without DN. General characteristics of subjects were collected via a demographic questionnaire, whilst systolic and diastolic blood pressure was evaluated via sphygmomanometer.

Biochemical measurements

Blood levels of FBG, 2HBG, HbA1C were measured, whilst other biochemical markers, including triglycerides (TG), low and high-density lipoprotein (LDL, HDL), total cholesterol (TC), serum creatinine (Cr), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN), were collected from their medical records from the last three months.

Anthropometric and physical activity measurements

Weight (kg) and height (cm) were measured, with participants in light clothing and unshod, using Seca 216 to the nearest 0.1 cm and a digital scale (SECA, Hamburg, Germany) to the nearest 0.1 kg, respectively, by an expert dietitian. Waist circumference (WC) (cm) was measured, and body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2) was calculated according to standard formulae. Physical activity (PA) was assessed by completing the validated short form of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) [16, 17].

Dietary intakes and phytochemical index

To discern the dietary intakes of participants, the 147 items-validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used. Total foods intakes were converted to gram per day [18]. NUTRITIONIST 4 (First Data Bank, San Bruno, CA) software was used to evaluate the nutrients content. The dietary phytochemical index (PI) was calculated through method of McCarty; [PI = (daily energy derived from phytochemical-rich foods kcal/total daily energy intake kcal) × 100] [11]. Phytochemical-rich foods included fruits and vegetables (except potatoes), their juices like tomato sauces, legumes, whole grains, nuts, soy products, olives, and olive oil [19]. Total energy intake of < 500 or > 3500 kcal was accepted.

Statistical analysis

The normality of data was evaluated using visual graph inspection and the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Qualitative and quantitative variables were shown as frequency (%) and mean ± SD respectively. Dietary PI was divided to two groups according to the median (lower and higher adherence). General characteristics of participants were compared among case and control groups and PI groups using an independent sample T test and Chi-square test. Dietary intakes of the participants across PI groups were assessed using general linear models and independent sample T test. To investigate the relationship between dietary PI and DN, logistic regression was used. The odds ratio (OR) of DN, and its 95% confidence interval (CI), was shown for each groups of PI. Two models were created: Model 1 was adjusted for age, BMI, energy intake, and physical activity (PA). Model 2 was adjusted for confounders in model 1, plus diabetes duration, cardiovascular diseases history, and drug usage (angiotensin receptor blockers; angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, metformin, sulphonyl urea, and insulin). All statistical analysis were conducted using SPSS (Version 16.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), and p values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

General characteristics of participants

General characteristics of the subjects across case and controls, and groups of PI, were shown in Tables 1 and 2. The mean ± SD of age in group of case were 55.33 ± 7.04 (years), whilst the mean ± SD of FBS and serum creatinine, albumin, and dietary PI in (case and control) groups were (167.10 ± 50.62–154.19 ± 45.03) (mg/dl), (0.92 ± 0.16–0.87 ± 0.17) (mg/dl), (14.40 ± 11.94–8.37 ± 6.76) (mg/dl) and (88.01 ± 29.96–103.28 ± 43.83), respectively. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) prescription was significantly different between cases and controls (P < 0.05). In addition, in the case group, those in the higher adherence of median of dietary PI had a lower level of FBS (P = 0.04). In the control group those in higher adherence of median of dietary PI had a lower level of albumin (P = 0.001).

Table 1 General characteristics of subjects across case and control groups
Table 2 General characteristics of subjects between lower and higher adherence of dietary phytochemical index

Dietary intakes of participants

The relative distribution of different phytochemical rich components of PI score and total nutrients intakes across PI groups were shown in Table 3. The percentage of daily intake of energy from fruits and vegetables were higher than other sources of phytochemical rich foods, and the percent share of olives was the least among phytochemical rich foods. Dietary cholesterol and sodium were lower in higher adherence of median of PI score among the control group (P < 0.005). Conversely, higher consumption of vitamin A was seen in the higher group among the control group after adjusting energy intake. Intakes of fruits, vegetables, legumes, grains, and olives were higher among controls in low and high groups of PI. Sodium, fat, and carbohydrate consumption were significantly lower in higher adherence of median of PI in both cases and controls (p < 0.05), after adjusting for energy intake. Finally, soy consumption was statistically significantly different between PI groups in cases (P = 0.01).

Table 3 Dietary intakes of participants between groups of phytochemical index

The association between DN and PI score

Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of DN, from crude and adjusted models, across dietary PI groups are shown in Table 4. There was an inverse relationship between dietary PI and risk of DN (OR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.25–0.77; P = 0.04). After adjusting for potential confounders, the association remained significant, albeit with lower odds of having DN (OR = 0.15; 95% CI: 0.06–0.36; P < 0.001).

Table 4 Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of diabetic nephropathy based on lower and higher adherence of median of dietary phytochemical index among cases and controls

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first case–control study designed to assess the relationship between a dietary phytochemical index and the risk of diabetic nephropathy in Iranian women. In the current study, lower levels of FBS were observed in higher adherence of median of PI in the case group. Similar to our study, Aghdam et al., in a cross-sectional study, observed that participants with a higher PI had lower FBG [9]. Also, a longitudinal study reported a significant negative association between FBS level and PI at baseline, but not after 3-years of follow-up [19]. Numerous studies have reported a significant relationship between intake of various phytochemicals and better FBS levels in healthy participants [20] and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [21, 22]. However, some studies have suggested no significant association between FBS and PI in healthy subjects was evident [23].

Our results showed that, compared to the control group, case group participants had a lower daily intake of vegetables, fruits, grains, legumes, and olives. In addition, higher intakes of mentioned food groups in the higher adherence of median of dietary PI in controls may have an effective influence in the decreasing risk of DN in control group. No significant relationship was found between PI and lipid profile; however, in contrast to our study, Aghdam et al. [9] reported that a higher intake of phytochemical-rich food may be related to lower LDL and higher HDL levels. Golzarand et al. [24] found that the levels of TC, TG, and HDL were, in the highest quartile of PI, significantly reduced in healthy men, but not in women, after 3 years of follow-up [24]. The difference in characteristics of participants, study design, study sample size, food patterns, and eating habits of people in different countries are likely contributors to the inconsistent results in the literature. Also, the findings of our study suggest that phytochemicals could have a protective effect on DN, as we observed a negative relationship between dietary PI and the risk of DN. In line with our results, in 2020, a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing different dietary patterns, which had several common components including olive oil, whole grains, fruits, nuts, vegetables, and legumes, reported that these components might reduce diabetes and its complications [25]. The relationship and potential effects of dietary phytochemicals on the prohibition of T2DM and hyperinsulinemia have been corroborated in recent studies [26]; however, prior to our study, the relationship between PI and diabetic nephropathy has not previously been determined.

In general, several mechanisms might be involved in the relationship between PI and DN. Phytochemicals have been shown to confer ameliorative effects on diabetes and its complications [27]. It has also been reported that the properties of phytochemicals can ameliorate renal injury and pathologic metabolic alteration via the control of numerous signaling pathways. Additionally, plants are a major source of antioxidants and facilitate nephron conservation through a decrease in oxidative pressure, which consequently helps to control diabetes and its complications [28]. Mono and polyunsaturated fatty acids, and other bioactive compounds containing fiber, tocopherols, phenolic compounds, and phytosterols, have been reported to be beneficial in alleviating inflammation and oxidative stress and in reducing insulin resistance and secretion, which are pathogenic factors in diabetes [29] and diabetic microvascular complications [30]. Phytochemicals can impact carbohydrate metabolism and improve FBS [31] through inhibition of carbohydrate digestion and intestinal glucose absorption, stimulation of insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells, stimulation of hepatic glycolysis and glycogenesis, antioxidant properties, effect on intracellular signaling pathway, and gene expression [32]. The use of phytochemicals has also been related to reduced mortality and chronic disease risk [33, 34]. However, reduction in dietary fiber (as a rich source of phytochemicals) may influence glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and augment inflammation [35]. Thus, foods rich in phytochemicals may provide advantages in the inhibition of chronic disease.

Numerous strengths of the current study are worthy of consideration. To our knowledge, this is the first study to have assessed the association between PI and the risk of diabetic nephropathy in a case–control design. In addition, we considered non-calorie phytochemical-rich foods such as tea and spices. However, our study also has some limitations. The case–control nature of the study precludes cause and effect conclusions. Moreover, small errors in the dietary assessment may be present, mostly due to mis-recalling the data and misclassification errors by using FFQ. Another limitation is the lack of control for education in the analysis that might affect our findings. Moreover, our study only included women, thus, results are not generalizable to men.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we found evidence indicating an inverse relationship between consumption of foods rich in phytochemicals and risk of diabetic nephropathy in a sample of Iranian women. However, to confirm the veracity of these findings, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available as per the rules and regulations of the Community Nutrition Department of Tehran University of Medical Science, but are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

PI:

Phytochemical index

DN:

Diabetic nephropathy

LED:

Low energy density

HED:

High energy density

PA:

Physical activity

WC:

Waist circumference

ACR:

Albumin per gram of creatinine

T2DM:

Type two diabetes mellitus

FBS:

Fasting blood sugar

FBG:

Blood level of fasting glucose

2HBG:

2 Hour blood glucose

TG:

Triglycerides

TC:

Total cholesterol

Cr:

Serum creatinine

BUN:

Blood urea nitrogen

FFQ:

Food frequency questionnaire

ARBs:

Angiotensin receptor blockers

ACEIs:

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors

References

  1. Sameer A, Banday M, Nissar S. Pathophysiology of diabetes: an overview. Avicenna J Med. 2020;10(4):174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saeedi P, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9(th) edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kapur A, Seshiah V. Women & diabetes: our right to a healthy future. Indian J Med Res. 2017;146(5):553–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nazar CM. Diabetic nephropathy; principles of diagnosis and treatment of diabetic kidney disease. J Nephropharmacol. 2014;3(1):15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lim A. Diabetic nephropathy &ndash; complications and treatment. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2014;7:361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ko G, et al. Dietary approaches in the management of diabetic patients with kidney disease. Nutrients. 2017;9(8):824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abshirini M, et al. Higher intake of phytochemical-rich foods is inversely related to prediabetes: a case-control study. Int J Prev Med. 2018;9:64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim M, Park K. Association between phytochemical index and metabolic syndrome. Nurs Res Pract. 2020;14(3):252.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Delshad Aghdam S, et al. Dietary phytochemical index associated with cardiovascular risk factor in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021;21(1):293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim M, Park K. Association between phytochemical index and metabolic syndrome. Nutr Res Pract. 2020;14(3):252–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McCarty MF. Proposal for a dietary “phytochemical index.” Med Hypotheses. 2004;63(5):813–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Amini M, Parvaresh E. Prevalence of macro- and microvascular complications among patients with type 2 diabetes in Iran: a systematic review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009;83(1):18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Molitch ME, et al. Nephropathy in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(Suppl 1):S79-83.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jayedi A, et al. Dietary approaches to stop hypertension, mediterranean dietary pattern, and diabetic nephropathy in women with type 2 diabetes: a case-control study. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2019;33:164–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zelmanovitz T, et al. Diabetic nephropathy. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2009;1(1):10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Craig CL, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vasheghani-Farahani A, et al. The Persian, last 7-day, long form of the international physical activity questionnaire: translation and validation study. Asian J Sports Med. 2011;2(2):106–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mirmiran P, Hosseini-Esfahanil F, Jessri M, Mahan LK, Shiva N, Azizi F. Does dietary intake by Tehranian adults align with the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans? Observations from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. J Heal Popul Nutr. 2011;29(1):39. Available from: http://www.banglajol.info/index.php/JHPN/article/view.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bahadoran Z, et al. Dietary phytochemical index and the risk of insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction: a prospective approach in Tehran lipid and glucose study. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2015;66(8):950–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Urquiaga I, et al. Wine grape pomace flour improves blood pressure, fasting glucose and protein damage in humans: a randomized controlled trial. Biol Res. 2015;48(1):49–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu T, et al. Cinnamon extract improves fasting blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin level in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. Nutr Res. 2012;32(6):408–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rahimi HR, et al. The effect of nano-curcumin on HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, and lipid profile in diabetic subjects: a randomized clinical trial. Avicenna J Phytomed. 2016;6(5):567–77.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mirmiran P, et al. Association between dietary phytochemical index and 3-year changes in weight, waist circumference and body adiposity index in adults: Tehran Lipid and Glucose study. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2012;9(1):108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Golzarand M, et al. Dietary phytochemical index and subsequent changes of lipid profile: a 3-year follow-up in Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study in Iran. ARYA Atheroscler. 2014;10(4):203–10.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Martín-Peláez S, Fito M, Castaner O. Mediterranean diet effects on type 2 diabetes prevention, disease progression, and related mechanisms. A Review Nutrients. 2020;12(8):2236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Leiherer A, Mündlein A, Drexel H. Phytochemicals and their impact on adipose tissue inflammation and diabetes. Vascul Pharmacol. 2013;58(1–2):3–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Govindappa M. A review on role of plant(s) extracts and its phytochemicals for the management of diabetes. J Diabetes Metab. 2015;6:1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Parveen A, Jin M, Kim SY. Bioactive phytochemicals that regulate the cellular processes involved in diabetic nephropathy. Phytomedicine. 2018;39:146–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Leahy JL. Pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Med Res. 2005;36(3):197–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Safi SZ, et al. Molecular mechanisms of diabetic retinopathy, general preventive strategies, and novel therapeutic targets. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:801269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hanhineva K, et al. Impact of dietary polyphenols on carbohydrate metabolism. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11(4):1365–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vinayagam R, Xiao J, Xu B. An insight into anti-diabetic properties of dietary phytochemicals. Phytochem Rev. 2017;16(3);535-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-017-9496-2.

  33. Nachvak SM, et al. Soy, soy isoflavones, and protein intake in relation to mortality from all causes, cancers, and cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019;119(9):1483-1500.e17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kimble R, et al. Dietary intake of anthocyanins and risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(18):3032–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Najjar RS, Moore CE, Montgomery BD. Consumption of a defined, plant-based diet reduces lipoprotein(a), inflammation, and other atherogenic lipoproteins and particles within 4 weeks. Clin Cardiol. 2018;41(8):1062–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the study participants for their cooperation. We would like to acknowledge the Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, for the fund.

Funding

This work was supported by Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services funded and supported the present study [Grant number: 94–04-161–31155].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The project was designed by NB and AM; AM and FA collected the samples and analyzed the data; NB and DH wrote the paper; AM and CC reviewed and edited the paper; KHM conducted research and had primary responsibility for final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khadijeh Mirzaei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (Ethic Number: IR.TUMS.REC.1395.2644), and by the ethics committee of Semnan University of Medical Sciences (Ethic Number: IR.SEMUMS.REC.1395.66). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Authors have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

40795_2023_676_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Additional file 1.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bahrampour, N., Mirzababaei, A., Hosseininasab, D. et al. High intake of dietary phytochemical index may be related to reducing risk of diabetic nephropathy: a case–control study. BMC Nutr 9, 14 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-023-00676-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-023-00676-2

Keywords

  • Phytochemical index
  • Diet
  • Diabetic nephropathy
  • Diabetes