Skip to main content
Download PDF

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) impairs hypoxia-induced cellular and exosomal overexpression of immune-checkpoints and immunomodulatory molecules in different subtypes of breast cancer cells

BMC Nutrition volume 10, Article number: 41 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Tumor cells express immune-checkpoint molecules to suppress anti-tumor immune responses. In part, immune evasion takes place by secreting exosomes bearing immune-checkpoint and immunomodulatory molecules and their inducing and/or regulating agents e.g., microRNAs (miRs). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of omega-3 fatty acid, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), on the expression of some selected immune-checkpoint and immunomodulatory molecules and their regulating miRs under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions in triple negative (TNBC) invasive and triple positive non-invasive breast cancer cell lines.

Methods

MDA-MB-231 and BT-474 cells were treated with 100 µM DHA under hypoxic and normoxic conditions for 24 h. Exosomes were isolated by ultracentrifuge and confirmed by electron microscope and anti-CD9, -CD63, -CD81 immunoblotting. Total RNA from cells and exosomes were extracted and expression of CD39, CD73, CD47, CD80, PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 genes and their related miRs were evaluated by quantitative Real-time PCR.

Results

This study showed significant over-expression of immune-checkpoint and immunomodulatory molecules under hypoxic condition. Treatment with DHA resulted in a significant decrease in immune-checkpoint and immunomodulatory molecule expression as well as an upregulation of their regulatory miRNA expression.

Conclusion

DHA supplementation may be utilized in breast cancer therapy for down-regulation of cellular and exosomal immune escape-related molecules.

Significance of the study

This study showed anti-immunosuppressive effect of DHA on BC cell lines in normoxic and hypoxic conditions.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Globally, breast cancer (BC) is considered the most prevalent type of malignancy as well as the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths [1]. BCs are classified according to their expression patterns of certain molecules including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) [2]. Triple-positive BC (TPBC) subtype, also known as luminal B, accounts for almost 40% of cancer-related deaths [3] and triple-negative BC (TNBC) is responsible for 10–20% of all diagnosed BCs [4, 5]. The TNBC subtype is known as the most aggressive subtype with high recurrence rates, resulting in a higher death rate during the first year after treatment [6, 7].

Several studies have demonstrated the anti-cancer effects of omega-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (n–3 LCPUFAs), particularly DHA, on BC in vivo and in vitro [8, 9]. However, only a few studies have investigated DHA’s application for treating BC by reducing the tumor’s immune evasion [10, 11]. Accurate equilibrium between immune activation and suppression is called immune homeostasis. It not only accomplish efficient recognition, and eradication of pathogen but also inhibit self-destruction immune reactions. The evidences demonstrate that defeat of immune homeostasis occures in most of cancers [12]. When inflammatory responses are produced by immune system to fight infections, immune checkpoints play vital role to secure tissues from harm. Cancer cells highly express immune checkpoint molecules result in tumors escape from the antitumor immune response. These molecules are ligand-receptor pairs that have stimulatory or inhibitory effect on immune responses. Immune checkpoints are expressed on cancer cells, antigen-presenting cells, immune cells, or other sorts of cells cause development of immune system [12]. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA4) is an immune-checkpoint molecule on T cells which interactes with CD80 (B7-1) and CD86 (B7-2) on tumor cells to inhibit the induction phase of the T cell response. Of them, interaction of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand, PD-L1, inhibits effector phase of the T cell response [13]. Additional immune-checkpoints that may also contribute to tumor immune escape have been introduced such as CD47, B7-H3 (CD276), B7-H4 (VTCN1,B7X), CD39 and CD73 [14, 15]. CD39 and CD73 are two ectonucleosidases that are expressed on tumor cell surface, and have important roles in createing an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment [12]. These ectonucleosidases convert ATP to adenosine which can inhibit the T lymphocyte effector activity through the adenosine receptor [16]. CD47 is another immune-regulatory target present on the surface of various cells including solid and hematologic tumors. It signals circulating immune cells e.g. macrophages “not to eat” them by binding to phagocyte expressed signal regulatory protein-alpha (SIRPα) [17]. B7-H3 and B7-H4 are known as immunomodulatory proteins which belong to ligands of the B7 family which indicate inhibitory activity by suppressing T cells proliferation and activation and also downregulation of the T cells response. Therefore these molecules can effectively modulate tumor immunogenicity and cancer progression [18].

Lately, studies have suggested exosomes as novel mediators in immune evasion of tumor cells [19,20,21]. They are nanovesicles 30–150 nm in diameter and are able to modify immune responses [22, 23]. Exosomes play important roles in cancer development, progresssion and invasiveness by harboring various cargoes specially microRNAs [24, 25]. Apparently, exosomes transfer microRNAs successfully into “target” cells, which may promote the reprogramming of the immune system in favor of cancer development. Shuttled microRNAs serve as important messengers for transferring information between tumor cells, the immune system, and the microenvironment [21].

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of DHA on the expression of CD39, CD73, CD47, CD80, PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 genes and miR-142-3p, miR-133a, miR-30a-5p, miR-194, miR-424, miR-155-5p, miR-143 both in MDA-MB-231 (as a metastatic TNBC cell line) and BT-474 (as a non-metastatic triple positive cell line) and also their secreted exosomes under hypoxic and normoxic conditions.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and treatments

Two human breast cancer cell lines (BT-474 and MDA-MB-231) were used in this study which were purchased from the National Cell Bank of Iran (Pasteur-Institute, Tehran, Iran). These cell lines were cultured in complete Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium (Gibco Inc., El Paso, TX) which was supplemented by 10% of fetal bovine serum (Gibco Inc.), also 100 unit/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Cells were incubated at 37 °C in a 95% humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Cells with 80% confluency were treated with 100 µM DHA (Sigma-Aldrich) and 25 µM CoCl2 for 24 h. Cells treated with vehicle buffer (bovine serum albumin) were considered as control cells.

Exosome isolation

Once the cells reached 80% confluency, the supernatant was completely removed and the remained cells were washed by RPMI 1640 medium and the cell culture was proceeded by RPMI 1640 medium which was supplemented with the 5% of exosome-free-FBS for 24 h. Subsequently, the supernatants were subjected to centrifugation at 500 g for 30 min (4˚C) (Hettich Rotanta 46R, German) to eliminate cells and debris. Isolation process was followed by 30,000 g centrifugation for 2 h (4˚C) to eliminate the microvesicles and filtration by membrane filter (0.22 μm) and then ultracentrifugation at 110,000 g (4˚C) for 2 h (TLA-100.3, Beckman Coulter Life Sciences, Indiana, US). The exosome pellet was sonicated in PBS 3 times for 30 s and then stored at -20 °C for further experiments.

Transmitting electron microscope (TEM)

Evaluation of exosome morphology was assessed by transmission electron microscope (TEM). A droplet of exosome containing solution was used to fix the exosomes on 300 mesh copper grid at ambient temperature for 5 min. Then, negative staining was performed with 2% (wt/v) uranyl acetate solution (TAAB, England) for 5 min and visualized by LEO 906 Zeiss instrument with 80 Kv accelerating voltage [26].

Western blot analysis

Exosomes lysate were prepared by using protein lysis buffer (RIPA, Sigma-Aldrich). Prior to loading on 12% sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), the exosomal proteins were incubated with β-mercaptoethanol containing loading buffer for 10 min at 70˚C. Exosomal markers were detected by specific antibodies including anti-CD9, -CD81, and -CD63 antibodies (SANTA CRUZ,California, USA) according to standard western blotting protocol [9].

Quantitative real-time PCR

Cell lines and isolated exosomes were used for RNA extraction by TRIzol method (RiboEX, GeneAll Biotechnology, Korea) according to the instruction of manufacturer. The RNA concentration was evaluated by NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) and the RNA stored at -80 °C until next use. The extracted RNA samples were applied to assess the extraction qualitatively by electrophoresis on agarose gel to observe 18 and 28 s ribosomal RNA bands. The miRNAs were reverse transcribed by by Universal cDNA Synthesis Kit II (Exiqon, Vedbaek, Denmark) based on the manufacturer’s instruction. Also, cDNA from RNAs was synthesized by BioFact Kit (Daejeon, Korea).

Evaluation of the expression levels of CD47, CD73, CD39, PD-L1, CD80, B7-H3 and B7-H4 mRNAs, and miR-133a, miR-194, miR-30a-5p, miR-142-3p, miR-155-5p, miR-424, miR-143 was performed by Quantitative Real-time PCR method by using SYBR Green master mix (Ampliqon, Odense, Denmark) on LightCycler 96 system (Roche Company, Basel, Switzerland). Primers for target genes and GAPDH, as the reference gene, were designed by Primer Express 3.0 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), (Table 1). The comparative CT method was employed to evaluate the relative amounts (using 2−∆∆CTformula) of target mRNA in the test samples, which were normalized against GAPDH transcript level. Also, the expression levels of miRNAs were normalized against U6 as the housekeeping gene.

Table 1 Primer sequences for studied genes
Full size table

Statistical analysis

The obtained Data was analyzed by using the GraphPad Prism software version 6.0.1 (Graph Pad Prism, San Diego, CA, USA). After calculation of normality of data distribution using the one-way ANOVA test, the group comparisons were investigated using Dunnett and Tukey nonparametric test. The data were represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and P < 0.05 was considered the level of significance.

Results

Exosome characterization

Isolated Exosomes characteristics have been displayed in Fig. 1 for morphology and specific protein markers. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) results confirmed the morphology and size of the exosomes, and western blotting analysis showed their specific markers including CD9, CD81, and CD63 (Fig. 1.A, B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

(A) TEM result confirms cup-shape for morphology of exosomes around 100 nm, and (B) specific protein markers for exosome and supernatant CD9, CD81, and CD63

Full size image

Altered expression levels of target genes in BC cell lines under DHA treatment, and hypoxic condition

Under normoxic condition, treatment of MDA-MB-231 and BT-474 with 100 µM DHA caused significant down-regulation in the expression of CD39, CD73, CD47, CD80, PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 genes. Generally, the influence of DHA on the expression of studied genes were more prominent in BT-474 compared to MDA-MB-231 with the most altered expression level for CD39 in BT-474 (2674fold) and the least down-regulation for CD47 in MDA-MB-231 (1.24fold) (Fig. 2; Tables 2 and 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Expression levels of target genes in BC cell lines after treatment with DHA in MDA-MB-231 and BT-474. Cell lines were treated with 100µM under both hypoxic and normoxic conditions for 24 h. Expression level of selected mRNAs were determined by quantitative Real-time PCR * p = 0.0324, *** p < 0.0006, ****p < 0.0001

Full size image

Also, induction of hypoxic condition using 25 µM CoCl2 resulted in significant up-regulation in the expression of CD39, CD73, CD47, CD80, PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 genes especially in MDA-MB-231. Interestingly, the most up-regulated gene was CD47 in MDA-MB-231 (20 fold) and the least altered expression level was also for CD47 in BT-474 (1.04 fold) (Fig. 2; Tables 2 and 3).

To explore the effect of DHA in hypoxic condition, cells were treated with both DHA and CoCl2.

Statistical analysis showed that all cells down-regulated the expression level of studied genes after treatment with DHA; more altered expression level was observed for CD39, CD73, CD47, and CD80 in BT-474 cells and PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 in MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 2; Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2 Expression of studied genes in BT-474 cell line
Full size table
Table 3 Expression of studied genes in MDA-MB-231 cell line
Full size table

Altered expression levels of target miRNAs in BC cell lines under hypoxic condition, and DHA treatment

Under normoxic conditions, up-regulation of tumor-suppressor miRs was observed in MDA-MB-231 and BT-474 treated with DHA, including miR-142-3p, miR-30a-5p, miR-133a, miR-194, miR-424, miR-155-5p, miR-143 (Fig. 3; Tables 3 and 4). These miRs control the expression of CD39, CD73, CD47, PD-L1, CD80, PD-L1, and B7-H3, B7-H4 respectively. Likewise, DHA caused tumor-suppressor miRs to be up-regulated under hypoxic conditions compared with CoCl2 alone in MDA-MB-231 and BT-474 (Fig. 3; Tables 4 and 5).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Expression levels of studied miRs in BC cell lines after treatment with DHA in MDA-MB-231 and BT-474. Cell lines were treated with 100µM under both hypoxic and normoxic conditions for 24 h. Expression level of selected mRNAs were determined by quantitative Real-time PCR * p = 0.0465, ** p < 0.0030, *** p < 0.0042, **** p < 0.0001

Full size image

In both MDA-MB-231 and BT-474 cell lines, treatment with 25 µM CoCl2 induced hypoxia which resulted in non-consistent and different patterns of altered miR expression levels. (Fig. 3; Tables 4 and 5).

Table 4 Expression level of miRNAs in BT-474 cell line
Full size table
Table 5 Expression level of miRNAs in MDA-MB-231 cell line
Full size table

Altered expression levels of target genes in exosomes-derived from BC cell lines under hypoxic condition, and DHA treatment

A significant reduction of gene expression (CD39, CD73, CD47, CD80, B7-H3, and B7-H4) was observed in exosomes derived from BT-474 and MDA-MB-231 cells treated with DHA under normoxic conditions. This effect was notable in exosomes derived from MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 4; Tables 6 and 7). On the other hand, hypoxic condition induced by CoCl2 led to the significant over-expression of all studied genes in exosomes purified from BT-474 and MDA-MB-231. Interestingly, only CD47 gene was under-expressed in exosomes derived from both cell lines under hypoxic condition. Again, this effect was prominent in MDA-MB-231 cell lines (Fig. 4; Tables 6 and 7).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Expression levels of target genes in exosomes-derived from BC cell lines after treatment with DHA in MDA-MB-231 and BT-474. Cell lines were treated with 100µM under both hypoxic and normoxic conditions for 24 h. Expression level of selected mRNAs were determined by quantitative Real-time PCR * p = 0.0240, ** p < 0.0160, **** p < 0.0001

Full size image

DHA in hypoxic condition downregulated the expression of all studied genes in exosomes derived from BT-474 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines, consistent with other results. (Fig. 4; Tables 6 and 7).

Table 6 Expression of studied genes in exosomes- derived BT-474 cell line
Full size table
Table 7 Expression of studied genes in exosomes- derived MDA-MB-231 cell line
Full size table

Altered expression levels of target miRNAs in exosomes derived from BC cell lines under hypoxic condition, and DHA treatment

Expression pattern of selected miRNAs in exosomes derived from MDA-MB-231 and BT-474 cell lines after DHA treatment showed that all miRs were up-regulated in MDA-MB-231 in both hypoxic and normoxic conditions (exception was miR-194 in combination of DHA and CoCl2 treatment); however, only miR-30a and miR-143 showed higher expression in BT-474 after DHA treatment in normoxic condition. (Fig. 5; Tables 8 and 9). The expression of all tumor suppressor miRs in BT-474-derived exosomes was down-regulated under hypoxic condition (Fig. 5; Tables 8 and 9).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Expression levels of studied miRs in exosomes-derived from BC cell lines after treatment with DHA in MDA-MB-231 and BT-474. Cell lines were treated with 100µM under both hypoxic and normoxic conditions for 24 h. Expression level of selected mRNAs were determined by quantitative Real-time PCR * p < 0.0392, ** p < 0.0071, *** p = 0.0002, **** p < 0.0001

Full size image
Table 8 Expression level of miRNAs in exosomes-derived BT-474 cell line
Full size table
Table 9 Expression level of miRNAs in exosomes-derived MDA-MB-231 cell line
Full size table

Discussion

Newly, emerging strategy for immunotherapy of cancer is manipulation of inhibitory mechanisms of cancer cells on anti-tumor immune responses. Such mechanisms are exerted via some membrane bound and secretory molecules produced by tumor cells, that upon binding to their own receptors can initiate inhibitory signaling in immune cells. Exosomes are also recently discovered additional pathway for delivery of such inhibitory cargo including proteins, mRNAs and miRs. Hannafon et al. indicated that DHA changed BC exosome secretion and microRNA contents, which inhibited angiogenesis [27]. Aslan et al. proved that DHA has anti-angiogenesis effect in cellular and exosomal levels in BC cell lines [28]. Suppressing metastasis by DHA in TNBC cell line in normoxic and hypoxic conditions have been shown by Javadian et al. [9]. In another study, pro-apoptotic effect of DHA has been demonstrated via increasing ratio of cyclic AMP/cyclic GMP levels, and elevated the expression of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR)-α and toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) in treated BC tissues [29]. Huang et al. indicated that DHA inhibited proliferation of MCF-7 BC cell line by suppressing pAkt signaling [30]. About immune-activating effect of DHA, Han et al., indicated that DHA could activate and increase the proliferation and phagocytosis activity of macrophages, increase the proliferation of spleen cells and the natural killer (NK) cells activity, improve the production of cytokines including interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-2, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interferon (IFN)-γ in the spleen of immunosuppressed BALB/c mice [31].

The aim of this study was to investigate possible beneficial effect of omega-3 fatty acid DHA on the expression levels of immune checkpoint and immunomodulatory molecules and their controlling miRs in two metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer cell lines and their secreted exosomes under both hypoxic and normoxic conditions. Our results showed that hypoxia led to the up-regulated cellular and exosomal expression of CD39, CD73, CD47, CD80, PD-L1, B7-H3, and B7-H4 genes in BT-474 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines (Figs. 2 and 4; Tables 2, 3, 6 and 7). Treatment of cells with DHA down-regulated cellular and exosomal expression of all studied genes undernormoxic condition (Figs. 2 and 4; Tables 2, 3, 6 and 7).

In this study, we noticed that DHA down-regulated the expression of CD39 and CD73 in two BC cells and their derived exosomes under hypoxic and normoxic conditions. Thom et al. reported that CD39 activity was weaken after treatment with DHA in endothelial cells [32]. Their observations about expression of CD73 was increased in protein level but in mRNA level didn’t change after treatment with DHA [32]. Clayton et al. reported the first study of the immunosuppressive role of exosomes by expressing CD39 (also known as ectonucleoside triphosphatediphosphohydrolase-1) and CD73 (also known as ecto-5ʹ-nucleotidase) [33]. CD39 and CD73 are ecto-enzymes that promote tumor immune escape by the production of immunosuppressive extracellular adenosine in the tumor microenvironment and intervene with the anti-tumor immune reactions [34, 35]. Theodoraki et al. demonstrated that the highest levels of CD39/CD73 ectoenzymes and adenosine production were found in tumor-derived exosomes in patients with the stages III/IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [36]. Increased levels of CD73 expression on epithelial tumor cells were quietly associated with decreased disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and negatively correlated with the anti-tumor immunity in human TNBC [34]. The decreased expressions of CD39 and CD73 after treatment of DHA are harmful for tumor growth.

We observed DHA decreased CD47 expression in both cell lines whereas in exosomes alteration of CD47 expression between normoxic and hypoxic conditions didn’t show strike differences. Zhang et al. proved that hypoxia increased hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1)-mediated expression of CD47 in BC cells and led to reduction of phagocytosis BC cancer cells by macrophages which promoted cancer progression [37]. Massaro et al. demonstrated that CD47 expression was downregulated in HUVECs by DHA treatment [38]. CD47 causes immune evasion by interaction through expressed SIRPα on myeloid cells which leads to phosphorylation cytoplasmic immuno-receptor tyrosine-based inhibition motifs on SIRPα beside recruitment of Src homology 2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatases to provoke anti-phagocytic signal [39]. Reduction expression of CD47 has additional support for reinforcement immune responses.

Expression of CD80 and PD-L1 were down-regulated in all combination treatments excluding in Exo-BT under normoxic condition. Talamonti et al. demonstrated that bone marrow-derived M2 macrophages obtained from mice lacking DHA synthesis enzyme Elovl2−/− displayed a notable increase in CD80 and CD86 expression [40]. Based on a meta-analysis study, overexpression of CD80 is associated with growth and metastasis of BC [41]. According to researches, a negative correlation has been discovered between the survival rate of sufferers from BC and the expression of PD-L1 [42]. Fadaee et al. showed that DHA caused down-regulating the expression of PD-L1 in protein level in human colorectal cancer cell lines [43]. Also, Zhang et al. reported that DHA decreased the expression of PD-L1 in lung cancer by rising degradation of ubiquitin-proteasome in vitro and in vivo [44]. CD80 and PD-L1 have essential roles in suppression of immune system so down-regulation of these molecules improve efficacy of therapy.

In this study, decreased expression of co-inhibitory molecules B7-H3 and B7-H4 and increased expression of their regulating miRNA in all groups was experimentally significant. Recent researches have indicated that B7-H3 and B7-H4 are highly expressed in BC tissues compared to normal tissues [18]. These results offer crucial evidence for importance of down-regulation expression of immunosuppressive molecules to conquer malignancy.

About the effect of DHA on miRs, Komi et al. reported that DHA can modulate miRs associated BC. Also, Ghaffari et al. proved that DHA caused increase expression of anti-angiogenic and decrease levels of pro-angiogenic miRs in BC [45]. We evaluated tumor suppressor miRs such as miR-142-3p, miR-30a-5p, miR-133a, miR-194, miR-424, miR-155-5p, miR-143. DHA increased the expression of miR-142-3p and miR-30a-5p, but miR-142-3p did not increased under both conditions in Exo-BT. Expression of miR-30a-5p in DHA-treated cells under hypoxic condition did not increase in MDA-MB-231 and Exo-BT. Compelling evidence indicates that DHA increased miR-133a. Decreased expression of miR-424 was detectable just in Exo-BT. Also, miR-194 was increased except in MDA-MB-231 and Exo-BT. In contrast, Shekari et al. proved that DHA led to a significant under-expression of miR-194 in MKN-45 cell line [46]. Similar to previous studies, we found that miR-155 expression was increased in 3 groups except for the Exo-BT. Also, increased expression of miR-143 in all groups was experimentally significant.

As mentioned in the literature review, both colorectal cancer tissues and cells showed low miR-142-3p expression [47]. MiR-142-3p overexpression inhibits the invasion and migration of colorectal cancer cells [47]. The knockdown or overexpression of miR-30a-5p in the PC-3 cell line impacts cell proliferation, indicating a tumor suppressor function [48]. Compared with control groups, miR-133a expression was significantly decreased in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) tissues and cells. MiR-133a overexpression inhibits the viability of A549 cells while miR-133a knockdown enhances their viability [49]. In colon cancer cells, miR-424 was poorly expressed, resulting in malignant progression [50]. There are some studies that show miR-155-5p acts as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting the proliferation and metastasis of melanoma [51] and colorectal cancer cells [52]. A study by Soheilyfar et al. showed that miR-143 reduced BC invasion and metastasis [53].

It has been shown that downregulation of miR-142-3p resulted in upregulation of CD39 in regulatory T (Treg) cells [54], and miR-30a-5p can bind directly to the 3′-untranslated regions (UTR) of CD73 mRNA, subsequently reducing its expression in colorectal, NSCLC and pancreatic cancers [55,56,57]. Upregulated miR-133a could inhibit proliferation, invasion, and migration and promote cell apoptosis in laryngeal carcinoma by targeting CD47 [58]. MiR-424 has been reported to be inversely correlated with PD-L1 and CD80 expressions in ovarian cancer [59]. Bioinformatics software predicted that miR-155-5p and miR-194-5p can target PD-L1 [60]. Direct target genes of miR-143 are B7-H3 and B7-H4 in colorectal cancer [61].

Contrary to expectations, treatment of BT-474 cell line with DHA showed some conflicting expression especially under normoxic condition (Fig. 5; Table 8). We observed DHA decreased CD47 expression in both cell lines whereas in exosomes alteration of CD47 expression between normoxic and hypoxic conditions didn’t show strike differences. Furthermore, DHA increased miR-133a in Exo-BT. In contrast, exosomal expression of CD47 was down-regulated in two cell lines (Fig. 4; Tables 6 and 7). Further data collection is required to determine why DHA can affect mostly on some factors.

Also, hypoxia induced altered expression level of studied miRs, in some cases relevant to the expression level of target genes. DHA led to the up-regulated cellular expression level of all tumor-suppressor miRs in cells under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions (Fig. 3; Tables 4 and 5). This altered expression pattern was agreement with the expression level of target genes. The exception was the expression of miR-194 in MDA-MB-231 cell line under normoxic condition that was down-regulated after treatment with DHA (Fig. 3; Table 5). Exosomal expression of tumor-suppressor miRs was also up-regulated in MDA-MB-231 cell line after treatment with DHA under both hypoxic and normoxic conditions (Fig. 5; Table 9).

Recommendation of minimum daily consumption of omega-3 PUFAs are 200–450 mg. Also, up to 3 g/day is confirmed by FDA [62]. In clinical settings, enhancement of the immune responses, life quality, and overall survival in cancer patients have been reported as effects of omega-3 PUFAs [62]. Majority of clinical studies in the curative effect of omega-3 PUFAs have demonstrated reduction of C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, platelet aggregation, and inflammatory responses (by decreasing TNF-α, IL-8, and IL-6), increasing of IL-2, improvement immune response, count of neutrophils, helpful modulation of IL-10, decreasing of ICU postoperative, and hospital stay [62]. In palliative management of oral usage of omega-3 fatty acids, studies done for 12–84 days and noted that enhancement of life quality of cancer patients was seen [62]. In randomized clinical trials, omega-3 PUFAs has been employed during range of 3–17 days in the pre and or post-operative setting in the 876 gastrointestinal cancer patients. The findings of these researches were decreasing apoptosis of lymphocytes, and improvement of immune cell like boosting of CD3 + and CD4 + lymphocyte percentage, and reduction of inflammatory responses by decreasing of TNF-α, IL-6, and increasing of IL-10 production [62]. About other application of omega-3 fatty acids in clinical setting, many studies showed that omega-3 fatty acids could increase tolerability and efficacy of chemotherapy. clinical trials that employed DHA alone or combinations of other omega-3 PUFAs in cancer avoidance, and treatment proved DHA could enhance cytotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic drugs [63]. Moreover, DHA supplementation reduced adverse side effects of radio- and chemo-therapy. Combination DHA with cyclophosphamide, epirubicine, and 5-fluorouracil in BC patients caused decreasing of tumor cell proliferation [63]. Also, DHA led to induce apoptosis in the primary cells of CLL patients [64]. About BC, daily consumption of DHA during the chemotherapy in base of DHA levels in RBCs and plasma of BC patients, patients were separated two groups which consist of low and high incorporating. In group of high incorporating, time of tumor development delayed and overall survival longed comparison with the group of low incorporating. In additional, DHA incorporating associates with enzymatic activity, rates of metabolism, background diet, gender, and age of individuals [63].

The achievements of this research have been obtained in ideal laboratory conditions that have a two-dimensional growth environment. While in the clinical situation, cells grow and multiply in a three-dimensional environment, which can be completely different from two-dimensional laboratory conditions. On the other hand, ideal laboratory conditions will not exist in the clinical environment, so clinical results may differ from laboratory results.

Figure 6 shows a comprehensive summary of all results of this research.

Fig. 6
figure 6

A comprehensive summary of the results

Full size image

Conclusions

The up-regulation of immune checkpoint and immunomodulatory molecules, as well as the down-regulation of tumor suppressor miRs under hypoxic conditions, revealed BC progression under these conditions. DHA also reversed hypoxia-induced deregulation of immune-checkpoint and immunomodulatory molecules and their regulatory miRs in BC cells and their derived exosomes. Results of this study provide new insight into DHA’s anti-cancer properties and provide further evidence for the use of DHA as a supplement for BC therapies. Additionally, there is potential for developing new cancer therapeutic strategies through manipulating exosomes and their contents, including miRNAs such as miR-143, miR-155, miR-194, and miR-424, which target multiple immune checkpoints and immunomodulators.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article, and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. Waks AG, Winer EP. Breast Cancer Treatment: a review. JAMA. 2019;321(3):288–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ciriello G, Gatza ML, Beck AH, Wilkerson MD, Rhie SK, Pastore A, et al. Comprehensive molecular portraits of invasive lobular breast cancer. Cell. 2015;163(2):506–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Metzger-Filho O, Sun Z, Viale G, Price KN, Crivellari D, Snyder RD, et al. Patterns of recurrence and outcome according to breast cancer subtypes in lymph node–negative disease: results from international breast Cancer study group trials VIII and IX. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(25):3083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Badve S, Dabbs DJ, Schnitt SJ, Baehner FL, Decker T, Eusebi V, et al. Basal-like and triple-negative breast cancers: a critical review with an emphasis on the implications for pathologists and oncologists. Mod Pathol. 2011;24(2):157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morris GJ, Naidu S, Topham AK, Guiles F, Xu Y, McCue P, et al. Differences in breast carcinoma characteristics in newly diagnosed African–American and caucasian patients: a single-institution compilation compared with the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and end results database. Cancer: Interdisciplinary Int J Am Cancer Soc. 2007;110(4):876–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, André F, Tordai A, Mejia JA, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(8):1275–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(15):4429–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Newell M, Brun M, Field CJ. Treatment with DHA modifies the response of MDA-MB-231 breast Cancer cells and tumors from nu/nu mice to Doxorubicin through apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. J Nutr. 2019.

  9. Javadian M, Shekari N, Soltani-Zangbar MS, Mohammadi A, Mansoori B, Maralbashi S, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid suppresses migration of triple‐negative breast cancer cell through targeting metastasis‐related genes and microRNA under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. J Cell Biochem. 2020;121(3):2416–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Han L, Lei H, Tian Z, Wang X, Cheng D, Wang C. The immunomodulatory activity and mechanism of docosahexenoic acid (DHA) on immunosuppressive mice models. Food & function; 2018.

  11. Field CJ, Schley PD. Evidence for potential mechanisms for the effect of conjugated linoleic acid on tumor metabolism and immune function: lessons from n – 3 fatty acids. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(6):1190S–8S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xia C, Yin S, To KKW, Fu L. CD39/CD73/A2AR pathway and cancer immunotherapy. Mol Cancer. 2023;22(1):44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma P, Wagner K, Wolchok JD, Allison JP. Novel cancer immunotherapy agents with survival benefit: recent successes and next steps. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(11):805.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rouas-Freiss N, LeMaoult J, Verine J, Tronik-Le Roux D, Culine S, Hennequin C, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity of immune checkpoints in primary renal cell cancer: focus on HLA-G/ILT2/ILT4. OncoImmunology. 2017;6(9):e1342023.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wolchok JD, Chan TA, Cancer. Antitumour immunity gets a boost. Nature. 2014;515(7528):496.

    Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang R, Elsaadi S, Misund K, Abdollahi P, Vandsemb EN, Moen SH et al. Conversion of ATP to adenosine by CD39 and CD73 in multiple myeloma can be successfully targeted together with adenosine receptor A2A blockade. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(1).

  17. Feng R, Zhao H, Xu J, Shen C. CD47: the next checkpoint target for cancer immunotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol. 2020;152:103014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim NI, Park MH, Kweon SS, Lee JS. B7-H3 and B7-H4 expression in breast Cancer and their association with Clinicopathological Variables and T cell infiltration. Pathobiology: J Immunopathol Mol Cell Biology. 2020;87(3):179–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rong L, Li R, Li S, Luo R. Immunosuppression of breast cancer cells mediated by transforming growth factor-β in exosomes from cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 2016;11(1):500–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ning Y, Shen K, Wu Q, Sun X, Bai Y, Xie Y, et al. Tumor exosomes block dendritic cells maturation to decrease the T cell immune response. Immunol Lett. 2018;199:36–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alfonsi R, Grassi L, Signore M, Bonci D. The double Face of Exosome-carried MicroRNAs in Cancer Immunomodulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(4).

  22. Naseri Z, Oskuee RK, Jaafari MR, Moghadam MF. Exosome-mediated delivery of functionally active miRNA-142-3p inhibitor reduces tumorigenicity of breast cancer in vitro and in vivo. Int J Nanomed. 2018;13:7727.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Aslan C, Maralbashi S, Salari F, Kahroba H, Sigaroodi F, Kazemi T, et al. Tumor-derived exosomes: implication in angiogenesis and antiangiogenesis cancer therapy. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(10):16885–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Aslan C, Maralbashi S, Salari F, Kahroba H, Sigaroodi F, Kazemi T et al. Tumor-derived exosomes: implication in angiogenesis and antiangiogenesis cancer therapy. J Cell Physiol. 2019.

  25. Javadian M, Gharibi T, Shekari N, Abdollahpour-Alitappeh M, Mohammadi A, Hossieni A, et al. The role of microRNAs regulating the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in breast cancer development, progression, and metastasis. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(5):5399–412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lasser C, Eldh M, Lotvall J. Isolation and characterization of RNA-containing exosomes. J Vis Exp. 2012;59:e3037.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hannafon BN, Carpenter KJ, Berry WL, Janknecht R, Dooley WC, Ding WQ. Exosome-mediated microRNA signaling from breast cancer cells is altered by the anti-angiogenesis agent docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Mol Cancer. 2015;14:133.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Aslan C, Maralbashi S, Kahroba H, Asadi M, Soltani-Zangbar MS, Javadian M, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) inhibits pro-angiogenic effects of breast cancer cells via down-regulating cellular and exosomal expression of angiogenic genes and microRNAs. Life Sci. 2020;258:118094.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Geng L, Zhou W, Liu B, Wang X, Chen B. DHA induces apoptosis of human malignant breast cancer tissues by the TLR-4/PPAR-alpha pathways. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(3):2967–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang LH, Chung HY, Su HM. Docosahexaenoic acid reduces sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 and fatty acid synthase expression and inhibits cell proliferation by inhibiting pAkt signaling in a human breast cancer MCF-7 cell line. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):890.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Han L, Lei H, Tian Z, Wang X, Cheng D, Wang C. The immunomodulatory activity and mechanism of docosahexenoic acid (DHA) on immunosuppressive mice models. Food Funct. 2018;9(6):3254–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Thom VT, Wendel M, Deussen A. Regulation of ecto-5 -nucleotidase by docosahexaenoic acid in human endothelial cells. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2013;32(2):355–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Clayton A, Al-Taei S, Webber J, Mason MD, Tabi Z. Cancer exosomes express CD39 and CD73, which suppress T cells through adenosine production. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2011;187(2):676– 83.

  34. Buisseret L, Pommey S, Allard B, Garaud S, Bergeron M, Cousineau I, et al. Clinical significance of CD73 in triple-negative breast cancer: multiplex analysis of a phase III clinical trial. Annals Oncol: Official J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2018;29(4):1056–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Allard B, Longhi MS, Robson SC, Stagg J. The ectonucleotidases CD39 and CD73: novel checkpoint inhibitor targets. Immunol Rev. 2017;276(1):121–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Theodoraki MN, Hoffmann TK, Jackson EK, Whiteside TL. Exosomes in HNSCC plasma as surrogate markers of tumour progression and immune competence. Clin Exp Immunol. 2018;194(1):67–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang H, Lu H, Xiang L, Bullen JW, Zhang C, Samanta D, et al. HIF-1 regulates CD47 expression in breast cancer cells to promote evasion of phagocytosis and maintenance of cancer stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(45):E6215–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Massaro M, Martinelli R, Gatta V, Scoditti E, Pellegrino M, Carluccio MA, et al. Transcriptome-based identification of new anti-inflammatory and vasodilating properties of the n-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid in vascular endothelial cell under proinflammatory conditions [corrected]. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0129652.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu X, Kwon H, Li Z, Fu Y-x. Is CD47 an innate immune checkpoint for tumor evasion? J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Talamonti E, Pauter AM, Asadi A, Fischer AW, Chiurchiu V, Jacobsson A. Impairment of systemic DHA synthesis affects macrophage plasticity and polarization: implications for DHA supplementation during inflammation. Cell Mol life Sci: CMLS. 2017;74(15):2815–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Li Y, Bai W, Zhang L. The overexpression of CD80 and ISG15 are Associated with the progression and metastasis of breast Cancer by a Meta-Analysis Integrating three microarray datasets. Pathology oncology research: POR; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bastaki S, Irandoust M, Ahmadi A, Hojjat-Farsangi M, Ambrose P, Hallaj S, et al. PD-L1/PD-1 axis as a potent therapeutic target in breast cancer. Life Sci. 2020;247:117437.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fadaee M, Abbasi H, Maralbashi S, Baradaran B, Shanehbandi D, Dinevari MF, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid may inhibit immune evasion of colorectal cancer cells through targeting immune checkpoint and immunomodulator genes and their controlling microRNAs. Biofactors. 2022;48(5):1137–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang H, Chen H, Yin S, Fan L, Jin C, Zhao C, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid reverses PD-L1-mediated immune suppression by accelerating its ubiquitin-proteasome degradation. J Nutr Biochem. 2023;112:109186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ghaffari-Makhmalbaf P, Sayyad M, Pakravan K, Razmara E, Bitaraf A, Bakhshinejad B, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid reverses the promoting effects of breast tumor cell-derived exosomes on endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis. Life Sci. 2021;264:118719.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Shekari N, Javadian M, Ghasemi M, Baradaran B, Darabi M, Kazemi T. Synergistic beneficial effect of Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) and Docetaxel on the expression level of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and MicroRNA-106b in gastric Cancer. J Gastrointest cancer. 2020;51(1):70–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ren J, Li W, Pan G, Huang F, Yang J, Zhang H et al. Mir-142-3p modulates Cell Invasion and Migration via PKM2-Mediated aerobic glycolysis in Colorectal Cancer. Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam). 2021;2021:9927720.

  48. Zhao H, Lai X, Zhang W, Zhu H, Zhang S, Wu W, et al. MiR-30a-5p frequently downregulated in prostate cancer inhibits cell proliferation via targeting PCLAF. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019;47(1):278–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Shen Y, Yang Y, Li Y. MiR-133a acts as a tumor suppressor in lung cancer progression by regulating the LASP1 and TGF-β/Smad3 signaling pathway. Thorac cancer. 2020;11(12):3473–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Li N. CircTBL1XR1/miR-424 axis regulates Smad7 to promote the proliferation and metastasis of colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020;11(5):918–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Li H, Song JB, Chen HX, Wang QQ, Meng LX, Li Y. MiR-155 inhibits proliferation, invasion and migration of melanoma via targeting CBL. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(21):9525–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wang X, Zhong W, Bu J, Li Y, Li R, Nie R et al. EXOSOMAL PROTEIN CD82 AS A DIAGNOSTIC BIOMARKER FOR PRECISION MEDICINE FOR BREAST CANCER. Molecular carcinogenesis. 2019.

  53. Soheilyfar S, Velashjerdi Z, Sayed Hajizadeh Y, Fathi Maroufi N, Amini Z, Khorrami A, et al. In vivo and in vitro impact of miR-31 and miR-143 on the suppression of metastasis and invasion in breast cancer. J BUON: Official J Balkan Union Oncol. 2018;23(5):1290–6.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhao J, Cao Y, Lei Z, Yang Z, Zhang B, Huang B. Selective depletion of CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 + regulatory T cells by low-dose cyclophosphamide is explained by reduced intracellular ATP levels. Cancer Res. 2010;70(12):4850–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Xie M, Qin H, Luo Q, Huang Q, He X, Yang Z, et al. MicroRNA-30a regulates cell proliferation and tumor growth of colorectal cancer by targeting CD73. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):305.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhu J, Zeng Y, Li W, Qin H, Lei Z, Shen D, et al. CD73/NT5E is a target of miR-30a-5p and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhou L, Jia S, Chen Y, Wang W, Wu Z, Yu W, et al. The distinct role of CD73 in the progression of pancreatic cancer. J Mol Med. 2019;97(6):803–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Li H, Wang Y, Li YZ. MicroRNA-133a suppresses the proliferation, migration, and invasion of laryngeal carcinoma cells by targeting CD47. Tumour biology. the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine; 2016.

  59. Xu S, Tao Z, Hai B, Liang H, Shi Y, Wang T, et al. miR-424(322) reverses chemoresistance via T-cell immune response activation by blocking the PD-L1 immune checkpoint. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11406.

    Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Atwa SM, Handoussa H, Hosny KM, Odenthal M, Tayebi HME. Pivotal role of long non-coding ribonucleic acid-X-inactive specific transcript in regulating immune checkpoint programmed death ligand 1 through a shared pathway between mir-194-5p and mir-155-5p in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol. 2020;12(12):1211–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhou X, Mao Y, Zhu J, Meng F, Chen Q, Tao L, et al. TGF-β1 promotes colorectal cancer immune escape by elevating B7-H3 and B7-H4 via the miR-155/miR-143 axis. Oncotarget. 2016;7(41):67196.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Eltweri AM, Thomas AL, Metcalfe M, Calder PC, Dennison AR, Bowrey DJ. Potential applications of fish oils rich in omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in the management of gastrointestinal cancer. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(1):65–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Molfino A, Amabile MI, Mazzucco S, Biolo G, Farcomeni A, Ramaccini C, et al. Effect of oral docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation on DHA levels and Omega-3 index in red blood cell membranes of breast Cancer patients. Front Physiol. 2017;8:549.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Guièze R, Gyan E, Tournilhac O, Halty C, Veyrat-Masson R, Akil S, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid induces apoptosis in primary chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Hematol Rep. 2015;7(4):6043.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the financial support from the Immunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran and Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

Funding

This study was performed by grants from Immunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran (grant number: 95 − 011) and Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran (grant number: 97143).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Applied drug research center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Sepideh Maralbashi

  2. Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Science, Kermanshah, Iran

    Sepideh Maralbashi & Farhad Salari

  3. Immunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran

    Cynthia Aslan & Tohid Kazemi

  4. Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran

    Cynthia Aslan

  5. Department of Toxicogenomics, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands

    Houman Kahroba

  6. Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium

    Houman Kahroba

  7. Department of Basic Oncology, Health Institute of Ege University, Izmir, Turkey

    Milad Asadi

  8. Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Science, Tabriz, Iran

    Mohammad Sadegh Soltani-Zangbar, Navideh Haghnavaz, Farhad Jadidi & Tohid Kazemi

Authors
  1. Sepideh Maralbashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cynthia Aslan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Houman Kahroba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Milad Asadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mohammad Sadegh Soltani-Zangbar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Navideh Haghnavaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Farhad Jadidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Farhad Salari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tohid Kazemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Sepideh Maralbashi: Methodology, Investigation, Writing- Original draft preparation. Cynthia Aslan: Investigation, Methodology, Editing. Houman Kahroba: Investigation, Methodology, Editing.Milad Asadi: Methodology, Data Curation, Software. Mohammad Sadegh Soltani–Zangbar: MethodologyNavideh Haghnavaz: Investigation. Farhad Jadidi: Investigation. Farhad Salari: Visualization, Validation, Formal analysis, Funding acquision.Tohid Kazemi: Conceptualization, Validation, Supervision, Funding acquision.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Farhad Salari or Tohid Kazemi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maralbashi, S., Aslan, C., Kahroba, H. et al. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) impairs hypoxia-induced cellular and exosomal overexpression of immune-checkpoints and immunomodulatory molecules in different subtypes of breast cancer cells. BMC Nutr 10, 41 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00844-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00844-y

Keywords

BMC Nutrition

ISSN: 2055-0928

Contact us